From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ve0-x236.google.com (mail-ve0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::236])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F84688B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  4 Dec 2013 22:57:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id jy13so12974046veb.13
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:58:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=RDS2rPEiuEhH2P2lYPeldr7qLLUdJzZw+XEZNEHp6IQ=;
 b=SIhidz8a59jxcsXe+kIHgq7NQfR1UtqiQWoxn8t2fo1O3GVQQLSn0XK5YrvUQZgbx5
 PyQrr4TH7wwfy5XK/y1D5f5EFDmulnbU22r2R4AZ2UMSwMwIXamNnsPRopCetu4jRdO6
 SWwyfNtsPIDuLxks2SEa5mBC/Ib8b25lkQ75XTg7f53tvVExRXNakDsJVqLQxsNoOzwB
 j+HxcntK6UqTHLKXLsAoVq9+ZbbUo9dbkgiesNFEUCf28LiGFL8rUTafWRlYUbayk5mv
 dbOIgLgRYrrCZDEWWKOrZXW1s+IBFJnsfZz1+YjSrQrfuXmz/xbu0yFY678Tqg6Oi8NS
 Lj8w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.111.200 with SMTP id ik8mr16583701vdb.2.1386194282639;
 Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.177.70 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:58:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131204135125.0fb7bf3f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
References: <CAPrcauPLZrC5ve4ZX47de5JzT8fSDi6Za3Oe2wKKLpKNTuc6_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131204132548.05a151fe@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
 <CAPrcauOxmV0nYj1oznHz2s46br=pY=9GjmemKOT5_XQK1RhcUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131204135125.0fb7bf3f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:58:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPrcauPDDJfohwT6B=PYec4Pj6ycsMW+ffjE14=nrvdcBpurGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian <sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on the Ring Library
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:57:00 -0000

Understood. Thanks for getting back.

Regards,
Sambath


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Stephen Hemminger <
stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:47:10 -0800
> Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian <sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Stephen. I was going to do prototype something similar (not doing
> > the wakeup inline but using a background thread)
> > and is it a worthwhile effort to move this as a feature of the RTE ring
> or
> > is it best left at the application level.
> >
>
> I prefer that RTE ring stays as simple as possible.
> If you need a higher level abstraction, built it yourself
>