DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@oss.nvidia.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Matan Azrad <matan@oss.nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:58:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CH0PR12MB5091DC4EAAA31C48629D767FB9B99@CH0PR12MB5091.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWlNOkWK73aKxnUM@platinum>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> Sent: 15 октября 2021 г. 12:43
> To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Cc: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Matan Azrad
> <matan@nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:33:31PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > On 10/15/21 12:18 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> [...]
> > >>> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> > >>> index 51c0ba2931..2204f140b3 100644
> > >>> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> > >>> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> > >>> @@ -371,6 +371,8 @@ rte_mempool_populate_iova(struct rte_mempool
> > >>> *mp, char *vaddr,
> > >>>
> > >>>       STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&mp->mem_list, memhdr, next);
> > >>>       mp->nb_mem_chunks++;
> > >>> +     if (iova == RTE_BAD_IOVA)
> > >>> +             mp->flags |= MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO;
> > >>
> > >> As I understand rte_mempool_populate_iova() may be called few times
> > >> for one mempool. The flag must be set if all invocations are done
> > >> with RTE_BAD_IOVA. So, it should be set by default and just removed
> > >> when iova != RTE_BAD_IOVA happens.
> > >
> > > I don't agree at all. If any object of the pool is unsuitable for
> > > IO, the pool cannot be considered suitable for IO. So if there's a
> > > single invocation with RTE_BAD_IOVA, the flag must be set forever.
> >
> > If so, some objects may be used for IO, some cannot be used.
> > What should happen if an application allocates an object which is
> > suitable for IO and try to use it this way?
> 
> If the application can predict if the allocated object is usable for IO
> before allocating it, I would be surprised to have it used for IO. I agree
> with Dmitry here.

The flag hints to components, PMDs before all,
that objects from this mempool will never be used for IO,
so that the component can save some memory mapping or DMA configuration.
If the flag is set when even a single object may be used for IO,
the consumer of the flag will not be ready for that.
Whatever a corner case it is, Andrew is correct.
There is a subtle difference between "pool is not usable"
(as described now) and "objects from this mempool will never be used"
(as stated above), I'll highlight it in the flag description.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-18  9:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  3:12   ` Jerin Jacob
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18  9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " dkozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks dkozlyuk
2021-10-05 16:34     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag dkozlyuk
2021-10-05 16:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12  6:06       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities dkozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration dkozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  6:33       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12  9:37         ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  9:46           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  3:37       ` Jerin Jacob
2021-10-12  6:42       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 12:40         ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 12:53           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 13:11             ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  8:52         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15  9:13           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-19 13:08           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 12:12         ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:07           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 13:40             ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  9:01         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15  9:18           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  9:33             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15  9:38               ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15  9:43               ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15  9:58                 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2021-10-15 12:11                   ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15  9:25         ` David Marchand
2021-10-15 10:42           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 11:41             ` David Marchand
2021-10-15 12:13               ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:19         ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:27           ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 13:43             ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-19 13:08               ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-20  9:29           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-20  9:30           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-15 16:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-29  3:30                 ` Jiang, YuX
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-19 14:36                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CH0PR12MB5091DC4EAAA31C48629D767FB9B99@CH0PR12MB5091.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=dkozlyuk@oss.nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@oss.nvidia.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).