From: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
To: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:37:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CH2PR18MB3270BF34EBDE94062F800F71B40D0@CH2PR18MB3270.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114090453.4548-2-skori@marvell.com>
Hello Thomas,
I have uploaded next version after handling Jerin's comments.
Can you please look into the series so that It can be applied if there is no more comments ?
Thanks.
Regards
Sunil Kumar Kori
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 2:35 PM
>To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Nithin Kumar
>Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>; Vamsi Krishna Attunuru
><vattunuru@marvell.com>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>; Harman Kalra
><hkalra@marvell.com>
>Subject: [PATCH v7 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response
>mbox message
>
>Currently otx2_mbox_get_rsp_xxx get response once AF driver interrupts
>after completion. But this function will get into deadlock if called in another
>interrupt context.
>
>To avoid it, implemented another version of this function which polls on
>dedicated memory for a given timeout.
>
>Also after clearing interrupt, there could UP messages available for processing.
>So irq handler must check mbox messages.
>
>Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
>Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>
>Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
>---
>v7:
> - Corrected spelling in commit message
>v6:
> - Removed unnecessary code.
>v5:
> - Fix shared library compilation error
>v4:
> - used rte_io_rmb instead of rte_rmb in mbox_poll.
>v3:
> - Remove experimental tag as API is defined static.
> - Merge all changes to single patch.
>v2:
> - Included Makefile and meson build changes.
> - Rebased patch on 19.11-rc4
>
> drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c | 41 +++++++++++-----------
>drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>- drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h | 5 +--
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c
>b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c
>index 0fc799e4a..d61c712fa 100644
>--- a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c
>+++ b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_dev.c
>@@ -577,17 +577,16 @@ otx2_pf_vf_mbox_irq(void *param)
>
> intr = otx2_read64(dev->bar2 + RVU_VF_INT);
> if (intr == 0)
>- return;
>+ otx2_base_dbg("Proceeding to check mbox UP messages if
>any");
>
> otx2_write64(intr, dev->bar2 + RVU_VF_INT);
> otx2_base_dbg("Irq 0x%" PRIx64 "(pf:%d,vf:%d)", intr, dev->pf, dev-
>>vf);
>- if (intr) {
>- /* First process all configuration messages */
>- otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
>
>- /* Process Uplink messages */
>- otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
>- }
>+ /* First process all configuration messages */
>+ otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
>+
>+ /* Process Uplink messages */
>+ otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
> }
>
> static void
>@@ -598,18 +597,16 @@ otx2_af_pf_mbox_irq(void *param)
>
> intr = otx2_read64(dev->bar2 + RVU_PF_INT);
> if (intr == 0)
>- return;
>+ otx2_base_dbg("Proceeding to check mbox UP messages if
>any");
>
> otx2_write64(intr, dev->bar2 + RVU_PF_INT);
>-
> otx2_base_dbg("Irq 0x%" PRIx64 "(pf:%d,vf:%d)", intr, dev->pf, dev-
>>vf);
>- if (intr) {
>- /* First process all configuration messages */
>- otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
>
>- /* Process Uplink messages */
>- otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
>- }
>+ /* First process all configuration messages */
>+ otx2_process_msgs(dev, dev->mbox);
>+
>+ /* Process Uplink messages */
>+ otx2_process_msgs_up(dev, &dev->mbox_up);
> }
>
> static int
>@@ -900,6 +897,7 @@ otx2_dev_priv_init(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev,
>void *otx2_dev) {
> int up_direction = MBOX_DIR_PFAF_UP;
> int rc, direction = MBOX_DIR_PFAF;
>+ uint64_t intr_offset = RVU_PF_INT;
> struct otx2_dev *dev = otx2_dev;
> uintptr_t bar2, bar4;
> uint64_t bar4_addr;
>@@ -924,15 +922,18 @@ otx2_dev_priv_init(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev,
>void *otx2_dev)
> if (otx2_dev_is_vf(dev)) {
> direction = MBOX_DIR_VFPF;
> up_direction = MBOX_DIR_VFPF_UP;
>+ intr_offset = RVU_VF_INT;
> }
>
> /* Initialize the local mbox */
>- rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_local, bar4, bar2, direction, 1);
>+ rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_local, bar4, bar2, direction, 1,
>+ intr_offset);
> if (rc)
> goto error;
> dev->mbox = &dev->mbox_local;
>
>- rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_up, bar4, bar2, up_direction, 1);
>+ rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_up, bar4, bar2, up_direction, 1,
>+ intr_offset);
> if (rc)
> goto error;
>
>@@ -967,13 +968,15 @@ otx2_dev_priv_init(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev,
>void *otx2_dev)
> }
> /* Init mbox object */
> rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_vfpf, (uintptr_t)hwbase,
>- bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF, pci_dev->max_vfs);
>+ bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF, pci_dev->max_vfs,
>+ intr_offset);
> if (rc)
> goto iounmap;
>
> /* PF -> VF UP messages */
> rc = otx2_mbox_init(&dev->mbox_vfpf_up, (uintptr_t)hwbase,
>- bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF_UP, pci_dev-
>>max_vfs);
>+ bar2, MBOX_DIR_PFVF_UP, pci_dev-
>>max_vfs,
>+ intr_offset);
> if (rc)
> goto mbox_fini;
> }
>diff --git a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c
>b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c
>index c359bf42f..1ec0d6f69 100644
>--- a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c
>+++ b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.c
>@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <rte_cycles.h>
>
> #include "otx2_mbox.h"
>+#include "otx2_dev.h"
>
> #define RVU_AF_AFPF_MBOX0 (0x02000)
> #define RVU_AF_AFPF_MBOX1 (0x02008)
>@@ -59,12 +60,13 @@ otx2_mbox_reset(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid)
>}
>
> int
>-otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t hwbase,
>- uintptr_t reg_base, int direction, int ndevs)
>+otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t hwbase, uintptr_t
>reg_base,
>+ int direction, int ndevs, uint64_t intr_offset)
> {
> struct otx2_mbox_dev *mdev;
> int devid;
>
>+ mbox->intr_offset = intr_offset;
> mbox->reg_base = reg_base;
> mbox->hwbase = hwbase;
>
>@@ -244,6 +246,39 @@ otx2_mbox_get_rsp(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int
>devid, void **msg)
> return msghdr->rc;
> }
>
>+/**
>+ * Polling for given wait time to get mailbox response */ static int
>+mbox_poll(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uint32_t wait) {
>+ uint32_t timeout = 0, sleep = 1;
>+ uint32_t wait_us = wait * 1000;
>+ uint64_t rsp_reg = 0;
>+ uintptr_t reg_addr;
>+
>+ reg_addr = mbox->reg_base + mbox->intr_offset;
>+ do {
>+ rsp_reg = otx2_read64(reg_addr);
>+
>+ if (timeout >= wait_us)
>+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
>+
>+ rte_delay_us(sleep);
>+ timeout += sleep;
>+ } while (!rsp_reg);
>+
>+ rte_smp_rmb();
>+
>+ /* Clear interrupt */
>+ otx2_write64(rsp_reg, reg_addr);
>+
>+ /* Reset mbox */
>+ otx2_mbox_reset(mbox, 0);
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
> /**
> * @internal
> * Wait and get mailbox response with timeout @@ -321,11 +356,15 @@
>otx2_mbox_wait_for_rsp_tmo(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid, uint32_t
>tmo)
> }
>
> /* Wait message */
>- rc = mbox_wait(mbox, devid, tmo);
>- if (rc)
>- return rc;
>+ if (rte_thread_is_intr())
>+ rc = mbox_poll(mbox, tmo);
>+ else
>+ rc = mbox_wait(mbox, devid, tmo);
>
>- return mdev->msgs_acked;
>+ if (!rc)
>+ rc = mdev->num_msgs;
>+
>+ return rc;
> }
>
> /**
>diff --git a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h
>b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h
>index e0e4e2f63..0535cec36 100644
>--- a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h
>+++ b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_mbox.h
>@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ struct otx2_mbox {
> uint16_t tx_size; /* Size of Tx region */
> uint16_t ndevs; /* The number of peers */
> struct otx2_mbox_dev *dev;
>+ uint64_t intr_offset; /* Offset to interrupt register */
> };
>
> /* Header which precedes all mbox messages */ @@ -1562,8 +1563,8 @@
>struct tim_enable_rsp { const char *otx2_mbox_id2name(uint16_t id); int
>otx2_mbox_id2size(uint16_t id); void otx2_mbox_reset(struct otx2_mbox
>*mbox, int devid); -int otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t
>hwbase,
>- uintptr_t reg_base, int direction, int ndevs);
>+int otx2_mbox_init(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, uintptr_t hwbase, uintptr_t
>reg_base,
>+ int direction, int ndevsi, uint64_t intr_offset);
> void otx2_mbox_fini(struct otx2_mbox *mbox); void
>otx2_mbox_msg_send(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid); int
>otx2_mbox_wait_for_rsp(struct otx2_mbox *mbox, int devid);
>--
>2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-21 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 11:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] drivers/octeontx2: allow experimental symbols Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] common/octeontx2: add interrupt offset to mbox structure Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-25 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] common/octeontx2: enhancing mbox APIs to get response Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-26 6:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers/octeontx2: allow experimental symbols Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-26 16:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-27 8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 9:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] common/octeontx2: add interrupt offset to mbox structure Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-27 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] drivers/octeontx2: enhancing mbox APIs to get response Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-11-28 0:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Stephen Hemminger
2019-11-28 8:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Harman Kalra
2019-11-28 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-12-04 16:23 ` Harman Kalra
2019-12-16 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-16 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 8:02 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-12-17 11:14 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-12-18 2:45 ` Gavin Hu
2019-12-17 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 16:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-17 16:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-18 2:54 ` Gavin Hu
2019-12-18 7:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-18 7:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-20 6:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-12-20 6:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-01-14 8:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-01-14 10:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-14 9:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-01-14 9:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] common/octeontx2: add polling based response mbox message Sunil Kumar Kori
2020-01-21 8:37 ` Sunil Kumar Kori [this message]
2020-02-06 15:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] eal: add API to check if its interrupt context David Marchand
2020-01-14 8:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CH2PR18MB3270BF34EBDE94062F800F71B40D0@CH2PR18MB3270.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=skori@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).