DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vemula, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.vemula@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Singh, Aman Deep" <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	"Wani, Shaiq" <shaiq.wani@intel.com>,
	"Marchand,  David" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/intel: add IDPF PCI class ID support
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:28:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CH3PR11MB77627D41B445AAE2826B3C2E9A1FA@CH3PR11MB7762.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aNQBkHHlRXghKY7j@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

Thanks, Bruce, for all your comments , 
Noted, will address in V3 patch, 

Thanks,
Venkatesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com> 
Sent: 24 September 2025 20:05
To: Vemula, Venkatesh <venkatesh.vemula@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Wani, Shaiq <shaiq.wani@intel.com>; Marchand, David <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/intel: add IDPF PCI class ID support

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 06:27:49PM +0530, Vemula Venkatesh wrote:
> Current IDPF supports only the MEV device IDs. MMG has new set of 
> device IDs and same might be the case for the future devices. Instead 
> of adding new device IDs every time, make use of the IDPF PCI class
> ID(0x20001) to differentiate between PF and VF.
> 
> Write and read the VF_ARQBAL register to find if the current device is 
> a PF or a VF.
> 
> v2: addressed reviewers comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vemula Venkatesh <venkatesh.vemula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c          |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h          |  3 +-
>  .../net/intel/idpf/base/idpf_controlq_api.h   |  1 +
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c   | 37 +++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h   | 17 +++++++++
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c          |  2 +
>  6 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c 
> b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> index 6d7b23ad7a..8cec977ecf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c
> @@ -2606,7 +2606,8 @@ cpfl_dev_vport_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, 
> void *init_params)  }
>  
>  static const struct rte_pci_id pci_id_cpfl_map[] = {
> -	{ RTE_PCI_DEVICE(IDPF_INTEL_VENDOR_ID, IDPF_DEV_ID_CPF) },
> +	{ RTE_PCI_DEVICE(IDPF_INTEL_VENDOR_ID, CPFL_DEV_ID_MEV) },
> +	{ RTE_PCI_DEVICE(IDPF_INTEL_VENDOR_ID, CPFL_DEV_ID_MMG) },
>  	{ .vendor_id = 0, /* sentinel */ },
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h 
> b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h
> index d4e1176ab1..566b395dae 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@
>  #define CPFL_ALARM_INTERVAL	50000 /* us */
>  
>  /* Device IDs */
> -#define IDPF_DEV_ID_CPF			0x1453
> +#define CPFL_DEV_ID_MMG			0x11E0
> +#define CPFL_DEV_ID_MEV			0x1453
>  #define VIRTCHNL2_QUEUE_GROUP_P2P	0x100
>  
>  #define CPFL_HOST_ID_NUM	2
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/idpf_controlq_api.h 
> b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/idpf_controlq_api.h
> index 8a90258099..7c25aabb28 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/idpf_controlq_api.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/idpf_controlq_api.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct idpf_hw {
>  	u16 subsystem_device_id;
>  	u16 subsystem_vendor_id;
>  	u8 revision_id;
> +	uint32_t cls_id;
>  	bool adapter_stopped;
>  

This is a poor location to add a new 32-bit field, right between two 8-bit fields. Adding it here will likely cause more padding than necessary to be added. Add the new field alongside other 32-bit fields to minimize padding.

>  	LIST_HEAD_TYPE(list_head, idpf_ctlq_info) cq_list_head; diff --git 
> a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c 
> b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c
> index ff1fbcd2b4..6f083770d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.c
> @@ -125,12 +125,12 @@ struct idpf_ctlq_create_info 
> vf_ctlq_info[IDPF_CTLQ_NUM] = {  };
>  
>  static int
> -idpf_init_mbx(struct idpf_hw *hw)
> +idpf_init_mbx(struct idpf_hw *hw, bool is_vf)
>  {
>  	struct idpf_ctlq_info *ctlq;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV)
> +	if (is_vf == 1)
>  		ret = idpf_ctlq_init(hw, IDPF_CTLQ_NUM, vf_ctlq_info);
>  	else
>  		ret = idpf_ctlq_init(hw, IDPF_CTLQ_NUM, pf_ctlq_info); @@ -388,8 
> +388,21 @@ idpf_adapter_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)  {
>  	struct idpf_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>  	int ret;
> +	int err;
> +	bool is_vf = 0;
>  
> -	if (hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV) {
> +	switch (hw->device_id) {
> +	case IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV:
> +			is_vf = 1;
> +			break;
> +	default:
> +			if (hw->cls_id == IDPF_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF) {
> +				err = idpf_is_vf_device(hw, &is_vf);
> +				if (err)
> +					return err;
> +			}
> +	}

There is no need for a switch statement here, I think. Simplify the code by just adding a "(hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV)" check at the start of idpf_is_vf_device function, and use that in all cases.


> +	if (is_vf) {
>  		ret = idpf_check_vf_reset_done(hw);
>  	} else {
>  		idpf_reset_pf(hw);
> @@ -400,7 +413,7 @@ idpf_adapter_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
>  		goto err_check_reset;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = idpf_init_mbx(hw);
> +	ret = idpf_init_mbx(hw, is_vf);
>  	if (ret != 0) {
>  		DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to init mailbox");
>  		goto err_check_reset;
> @@ -443,6 +456,22 @@ idpf_adapter_init(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +#define IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL		0xFEED0000
> +
> +/**
> + * idpf_is_vf_device - Helper to find if it is a VF device
> + * @pdev: PCI device information struct
> + * @is_vf: used to update VF device status
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure.
> + */
> +int idpf_is_vf_device(struct idpf_hw *hw, bool *is_vf) {
> +	IDPF_WRITE_REG(hw, VF_ARQBAL, IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL);
> +	*is_vf = (IDPF_READ_REG(hw, VF_ARQBAL) == IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

Why pass in is_vf as parameter and return int here, given that there is no possible error. I would rewrite as:

bool idpf_is_vf_device(struct idpf_hw *hw) {
	if (hw->device_id == IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV)
		return 1;
	IDPF_WRITE_REG(hw, VF_ARQBAL, IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL);
	return IDPF_READ_REG(hw, VF_ARQBAL) == IDPF_VF_TEST_VAL; }

While only one line longer, it removes the need for the switch statement above and all the error handling for a non-zero result which can never happen.

>  RTE_EXPORT_INTERNAL_SYMBOL(idpf_adapter_deinit)
>  int
>  idpf_adapter_deinit(struct idpf_adapter *adapter) diff --git 
> a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h 
> b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> index 5f3e4a4fcf..51da8214cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,23 @@
>  	(sizeof(struct virtchnl2_ptype) +				\
>  	 (((p)->proto_id_count ? ((p)->proto_id_count - 1) : 0) * 
> sizeof((p)->proto_id[0])))
>  
> +/** Macro used to help building up tables of device IDs with PCI class */
> +#define IDPF_PCI_CLASS(cls)          \
> +	.class_id = (cls),      \
> +	.vendor_id = RTE_PCI_ANY_ID,  \
> +	.device_id = RTE_PCI_ANY_ID,  \
> +	.subsystem_vendor_id = RTE_PCI_ANY_ID, \
> +	.subsystem_device_id = RTE_PCI_ANY_ID
> +
> +
> +/* PCI Class network ethernet */
> +#define PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET  0x0200
> +#define IDPF_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF				0x01
> +#define IDPF_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF			\
> +	(PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET << 8 | IDPF_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF)
> +

So the device does not identify itself as an ethernet device because it has it's class id set as the ethernet-class shifted by 8?


> +int idpf_is_vf_device(struct idpf_hw *hw, bool *is_vf);
> +
>  struct idpf_adapter {
>  	struct idpf_hw hw;
>  	struct virtchnl2_version_info virtchnl_version; diff --git 
> a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c 
> b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> index 90720909bf..80bf53db0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ idpf_adapter_ext_init(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev, struct idpf_adapter_ext *a
>  	hw->vendor_id = pci_dev->id.vendor_id;
>  	hw->device_id = pci_dev->id.device_id;
>  	hw->subsystem_vendor_id = pci_dev->id.subsystem_vendor_id;
> +	hw->cls_id = pci_dev->id.class_id;
>  
>  	strncpy(adapter->name, pci_dev->device.name, PCI_PRI_STR_SIZE);
>  
> @@ -1313,6 +1314,7 @@ idpf_dev_vport_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, 
> void *init_params)  static const struct rte_pci_id pci_id_idpf_map[] = {
>  	{ RTE_PCI_DEVICE(IDPF_INTEL_VENDOR_ID, IDPF_DEV_ID_PF) },
>  	{ RTE_PCI_DEVICE(IDPF_INTEL_VENDOR_ID, IDPF_DEV_ID_SRIOV) },
> +	{ IDPF_PCI_CLASS(IDPF_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET_PROGIF) },
>  	{ .vendor_id = 0, /* sentinel */ },
>  };
>  
> --
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-26  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-19 14:51 [PATCH v1] net/idpf: " Vemula Venkatesh
2025-09-22  8:31 ` Wani, Shaiq
2025-09-22 12:09 ` David Marchand
2025-09-22 16:35   ` Singh, Aman Deep
2025-09-23  6:52     ` David Marchand
2025-09-24 12:57 ` [PATCH v2] net/intel: " Vemula Venkatesh
2025-09-24 14:34   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-09-25 10:28     ` Vemula, Venkatesh [this message]
2025-09-25 17:47   ` [PATCH v3] " Vemula Venkatesh
2025-09-26 15:26     ` Singh, Aman Deep

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CH3PR11MB77627D41B445AAE2826B3C2E9A1FA@CH3PR11MB7762.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=venkatesh.vemula@intel.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=shaiq.wani@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).