DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kundapura, Ganapati" <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
To: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Jayatheerthan, Jay" <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eventdev/rx-adapter: add telemetry callbacks
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:29:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB48820B15DAB2D96D6E3FB04187B69@CO1PR11MB4882.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce502d21-c16e-e128-a9f1-9c24f7a731a2@ashroe.eu>

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kinsella, Ray <mdr@ashroe.eu>
> Sent: 12 October 2021 15:35
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Cc: Kundapura, Ganapati <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>; David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com>; dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Jayatheerthan, Jay
> <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] eventdev/rx-adapter: add telemetry callbacks
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/10/2021 10:26, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:40 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> 12/10/2021 10:47, Jerin Jacob:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:05 PM Kundapura, Ganapati
> >>> <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com> wrote:
> >>>> From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> --- a/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/lib/eventdev/rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h
> >>>>>> @@ -216,6 +216,10 @@ struct rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_stats {
> >>>>>>         /**< Eventdev enqueue count */
> >>>>>>         uint64_t rx_enq_retry;
> >>>>>>         /**< Eventdev enqueue retry count */
> >>>>>> +       uint64_t rx_event_buf_count;
> >>>>>> +       /**< Rx event buffered count */
> >>>>>> +       uint64_t rx_event_buf_size;
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Isn't ABI breakage? CI did not warn this. Isn't this a public structure?
> >>>> Please confirm if moving the above two members to end of the structure
> overcomes ABI breakage?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> + @Ray Kinsella @Thomas Monjalon  @David Marchand
> >>>
> >>> It will still break the ABI. IMO, Since it is an ABI breaking
> >>> release it is OK. If there are no other objections, Please move the
> >>> variable to end of the structure and update release notes for ABI
> >>> changes.
> >>
> >> Why moving since it breaks ABI anyway?
> >
> > There is no specific gain in keeping new additions in the middle of structure.
> 
> 21.11 is an ABI breaking release, so move it where you like :-)
Posted new patch with the new struct members moved to the end of the struct, 
updated release notes and review comments addressed.
> 
> >> I think you can keep as is.
> >>
> >>
> >>

      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-07 12:57 Ganapati Kundapura
2021-10-07 13:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ganapati Kundapura
2021-10-07 16:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2021-10-12 10:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] eventdev/rx_adapter: " Ganapati Kundapura
2021-10-12 13:09     ` Jayatheerthan, Jay
2021-10-12 14:05       ` Naga Harish K, S V
2021-10-12 16:13         ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2021-10-13  6:48           ` Naga Harish K, S V
2021-10-13  8:15             ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2021-10-13  7:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ganapati Kundapura
2021-10-13 12:09       ` Naga Harish K, S V
2021-10-14  8:25         ` Jerin Jacob
2021-10-11 16:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eventdev/rx-adapter: " Jerin Jacob
2021-10-12  8:35   ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2021-10-12  8:47     ` Jerin Jacob
2021-10-12  9:10       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12  9:26         ` Jerin Jacob
2021-10-12 10:05           ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 10:29             ` Kundapura, Ganapati [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB48820B15DAB2D96D6E3FB04187B69@CO1PR11MB4882.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ganapati.kundapura@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).