[PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Emma Finn]

Set vector pointer to NULL after free to avoid calling rte_free()
on the same pointer twice in some cases.

Signed-off-by: Emma Finn <emma.finn@intel.com>
---
 examples/fips_validation/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/examples/fips_validation/main.c b/examples/fips_validation/main.c
index f21826e9d7..60ee9f8dd4 100644
--- a/examples/fips_validation/main.c
+++ b/examples/fips_validation/main.c
@@ -2612,7 +2612,7 @@ fips_mct_sha_test(void)
 		rte_free(md[i].val);
 
 	rte_free(vec.pt.val);
-
+	vec.pt.val = NULL;
 	rte_free(val.val);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan]

> Set vector pointer to NULL after free to avoid calling rte_free() on the same
> pointer twice in some cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emma Finn <emma.finn@intel.com>
> ---
>  examples/fips_validation/main.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/fips_validation/main.c b/examples/fips_validation/main.c
> index f21826e9d7..60ee9f8dd4 100644
> --- a/examples/fips_validation/main.c
> +++ b/examples/fips_validation/main.c
> @@ -2612,7 +2612,7 @@ fips_mct_sha_test(void)
>  		rte_free(md[i].val);
> 
>  	rte_free(vec.pt.val);
> -
> +	vec.pt.val = NULL;

Same could be the case for fips_mct_shake_test also.

Thanks,
Gowrishankar
>  	rte_free(val.val);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.34.1

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Finn, Emma]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Sent: Thursday 28 August 2025 10:42
> To: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling
> pointer for SHA test
> 
> > Set vector pointer to NULL after free to avoid calling rte_free() on
> > the same pointer twice in some cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emma Finn <emma.finn@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  examples/fips_validation/main.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/fips_validation/main.c
> > b/examples/fips_validation/main.c index f21826e9d7..60ee9f8dd4 100644
> > --- a/examples/fips_validation/main.c
> > +++ b/examples/fips_validation/main.c
> > @@ -2612,7 +2612,7 @@ fips_mct_sha_test(void)
> >  		rte_free(md[i].val);
> >
> >  	rte_free(vec.pt.val);
> > -
> > +	vec.pt.val = NULL;
> 
> Same could be the case for fips_mct_shake_test also.
> 
Good catch, probably the same could happen with shake. 
I currently don’t have a way to test shake but I'm happy to make the change as part of this patch if you can test?

Thanks, 
Emma

> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar
> >  	rte_free(val.val);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.34.1

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan]

> > >  	rte_free(vec.pt.val);
> > > -
> > > +	vec.pt.val = NULL;
> >
> > Same could be the case for fips_mct_shake_test also.
> >
> Good catch, probably the same could happen with shake.
> I currently don’t have a way to test shake but I'm happy to make the change as
> part of this patch if you can test?
> 
Did you find any segfault and so got to know the problem ? If so, what was the command you executed ?.

Thanks,
Gowrishankar

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Finn, Emma]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Sent: Friday 29 August 2025 11:23
> To: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer
> for SHA test
> Importance: High
> 
> > > >  	rte_free(vec.pt.val);
> > > > -
> > > > +	vec.pt.val = NULL;
> > >
> > > Same could be the case for fips_mct_shake_test also.
> > >
> > Good catch, probably the same could happen with shake.
> > I currently don’t have a way to test shake but I'm happy to make the
> > change as part of this patch if you can test?
> >
> Did you find any segfault and so got to know the problem ? If so, what was the
> command you executed ?.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar

Running fips sample app with aesni_mb and SHA ACVP test vector files. Also occurs with QAT. 
./dpdk-fips_validation --vdev=crypto_aesni_mb -- --req-file $FIPS_DIR/$alg/req --rsp-file $FIPS_DIR/$alg/resp_aesni_mb --path-is-folder

Output shows invalid memory bug.
EAL: Detected CPU lcores: 64
EAL: Detected NUMA nodes: 2
EAL: Detected static linkage of DPDK
EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket
EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'VA'
EAL: VFIO support initialized
EAL: Using IOMMU type 1 (Type 1)
CRYPTODEV: Creating cryptodev crypto_aesni_mb
CRYPTODEV: Initialisation parameters - name: crypto_aesni_mb,socket id: 0, max queue pairs: 8
IPSEC_MB: ipsec_mb_create() line 168: IPSec Multi-buffer library version used: 2.0.0
EAL: Error: Invalid memory

SHAKE is not supported by these hence I did not catch it.

Thanks, 
Emma

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan]

> SHAKE is not supported by these hence I did not catch it.

OpenSSL PMD supports SHA and SHAKE. Could that help verifying both lines of fix ?.

Thanks,
Gowrishankar.

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Finn, Emma]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Sent: Friday 29 August 2025 13:17
> To: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer
> for SHA test
> Importance: High
> 
> > SHAKE is not supported by these hence I did not catch it.
> 
> OpenSSL PMD supports SHA and SHAKE. Could that help verifying both lines of fix
> ?.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar.

OpenSSL PMD only supports SHAKE-256 for EdDSA operations, not as standalone hash functions

Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Ji, Kai]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1060 bytes --]

Hi Gowrishankar,

Have you get a chance to test this patch against SHAKE on your ends ?

Regards

Kai

________________________________
From: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 14:14
To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Sent: Friday 29 August 2025 13:17
> To: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer
> for SHA test
> Importance: High
>
> > SHAKE is not supported by these hence I did not catch it.
>
> OpenSSL PMD supports SHA and SHAKE. Could that help verifying both lines of fix
> ?.
>
> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar.

OpenSSL PMD only supports SHAKE-256 for EdDSA operations, not as standalone hash functions

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2864 bytes --]

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

[Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2354 bytes --]

Hi,
I see example app runs normally with openssl PMD in my local tests, even without fix.

Thanks,
Gowrishankar

From: Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 9:23 PM
To: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test

Hi Gowrishankar, Have you get a chance to test this patch against SHAKE on your ends ? Regards Kai From: Finn, Emma <emma. finn@ intel. com> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 14: 14 To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@ marvell. com>
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
Prioritize security for external emails:
Confirm sender and content safety before clicking links or opening attachments
    Report Suspicious  <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/CRVmXkqW!ui3XGZ9YrjX626H8WV37YM2aa0G6UhN-cKsdbpw7pqWvplKrDOohK8dxT6B9_RqNiV6uMomo_2pTJiWsEIfe_ZdA07-kBAy14DcmaeM7eRLbMeeoTtyqbMs3d2Q0-a5r77yEbIlkHnqjs8o$>   ‌
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi Gowrishankar,

Have you get a chance to test this patch against SHAKE on your ends ?

Regards

Kai

________________________________
From: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com<mailto:emma.finn@intel.com>>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 14:14
To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com<mailto:gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com<mailto:kai.ji@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer for SHA test



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com<mailto:gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>>
> Sent: Friday 29 August 2025 13:17
> To: Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com<mailto:emma.finn@intel.com>>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com<mailto:kai.ji@intel.com>>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] examples/fips_validation: fix dangling pointer
> for SHA test
> Importance: High
>
> > SHAKE is not supported by these hence I did not catch it.
>
> OpenSSL PMD supports SHA and SHAKE. Could that help verifying both lines of fix
> ?.
>
> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar.

OpenSSL PMD only supports SHAKE-256 for EdDSA operations, not as standalone hash functions

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10212 bytes --]