From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
To: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>,
Amit Prakash Shukla <amitprakashs@marvell.com>,
Vidya Sagar Velumuri <vvelumuri@marvell.com>,
Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:27:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR18MB4714A660072A97DB7CB0DD98CBB3A@CO1PR18MB4714.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8833081-0390-26c1-f5d2-a75b66993d46@huawei.com>
Hi Fengchengwen,
>
> On 2023/11/3 23:38, Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan wrote:
> > Add scatter-gather copy tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar Velumuri <vvelumuri@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_dmadev.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > app/test/test_dmadev_api.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> --
> > app/test/test_dmadev_api.h | 2 +
> > 3 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_dmadev.c b/app/test/test_dmadev.c index
> > 780941fc1e..a2f3a7f999 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_dmadev.c
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> > #define ERR_RETURN(...) do { print_err(__func__, __LINE__,
> > __VA_ARGS__); return -1; } while (0)
> >
> > #define TEST_RINGSIZE 512
> > -#define COPY_LEN 1024
> > +#define COPY_LEN 1032
>
> The test MAX_SG_NUM is limit 4, so it could be 1/2/3/4 segment, and 1032 can
> both div 1/2/3/4, but 1024 couldn't
>
> I think this is why change 1024->1032.
> Suggest add some comment about it.
>
This change is not required after normalization as done in next patch.
> >
> > static struct rte_mempool *pool;
> > static int16_t test_dev_id;
> > @@ -396,6 +396,120 @@ test_stop_start(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +test_enqueue_sg_copies(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan) {
> > + unsigned int src_len, dst_len, n_sge, len, i, j, k;
> > + char orig_src[COPY_LEN], orig_dst[COPY_LEN];
> > + struct rte_dma_info info = { 0 };
> > + enum rte_dma_status_code status;
> > + uint16_t id, n_src, n_dst;
> > +
> > + if (rte_dma_info_get(dev_id, &info) < 0)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Failed to get dev info");
> > +
> > + n_sge = RTE_MIN(info.max_sges, TEST_SG_MAX);
> > + len = COPY_LEN;
> > +
> > + for (n_src = 1; n_src <= n_sge; n_src++) {
> > + src_len = len / n_src;
> > + for (n_dst = 1; n_dst <= n_sge; n_dst++) {
> > + dst_len = len / n_dst;
>
> If the len % [1~n_dst] not zero, how to process it ?
>
> I see, it was ensured by adjust copy_len value. Suggest add comments for it.
>
> Also suggest extra above to one function.
I have added minor fix here to normalize buffer lengths. Please check in next patch version.
>
> > +
> > + struct rte_dma_sge sg_src[n_sge], sg_dst[n_sge];
> > + struct rte_mbuf *src[n_sge], *dst[n_sge];
> > + char *src_data[n_sge], *dst_data[n_sge];
> > +
> > + for (i = 0 ; i < COPY_LEN; i++)
> > + orig_src[i] = rte_rand() & 0xFF;
> > +
> > + memset(orig_dst, 0, COPY_LEN);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_src; i++) {
> > + src[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool);
> > + RTE_ASSERT(src[i] != NULL);
> > + sg_src[i].addr = rte_pktmbuf_iova(src[i]);
> > + sg_src[i].length = src_len;
> > + src_data[i] = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(src[i], char *);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (k = 0; k < n_dst; k++) {
> > + dst[k] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool);
> > + RTE_ASSERT(dst[k] != NULL);
> > + sg_dst[k].addr = rte_pktmbuf_iova(dst[k]);
> > + sg_dst[k].length = dst_len;
> > + dst_data[k] = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(dst[k], char
> *);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_src; i++) {
> > + for (j = 0; j < src_len; j++)
> > + src_data[i][j] = orig_src[i * src_len + j];
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (k = 0; k < n_dst; k++)
> > + memset(dst_data[k], 0, dst_len);
> > +
> > + printf("\tsrc segs: %2d [seg len: %4d] - dst segs: %2d
> [seg len : %4d]\n",
> > + n_src, src_len, n_dst, dst_len);
> > +
> > + id = rte_dma_copy_sg(dev_id, vchan, sg_src, sg_dst,
> n_src, n_dst,
> > + RTE_DMA_OP_FLAG_SUBMIT);
> > +
> > + if (id != id_count)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error with rte_dma_copy_sg,
> got %u, expected %u\n",
> > + id, id_count);
> > +
> > + /* Give time for copy to finish, then check it was done
> */
> > + await_hw(dev_id, vchan);
> > +
> > + for (k = 0; k < n_dst; k++)
> > + memcpy((&orig_dst[0] + k * dst_len),
> dst_data[k], dst_len);
> > +
> > + if (memcmp(orig_src, orig_dst, COPY_LEN))
> > + ERR_RETURN("Data mismatch");
> > +
> > + /* Verify completion */
> > + id = ~id;
> > + if (rte_dma_completed(dev_id, vchan, 1, &id, NULL) !=
> 1)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error with
> rte_dma_completed\n");
> > +
> > + /* Verify expected index(id_count) */
> > + if (id != id_count)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error:incorrect job id received,
> %u [expected %u]\n",
> > + id, id_count);
> > +
> > + /* Check for completed and id when no job done */
> > + id = ~id;
> > + if (rte_dma_completed(dev_id, vchan, 1, &id, NULL) !=
> 0)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error with rte_dma_completed
> when no job done\n");
> > +
> > + if (id != id_count)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error:incorrect job id received
> when no job done, %u [expected %u]\n",
> > + id, id_count);
> > +
> > + /* Check for completed_status and id when no job done
> */
> > + id = ~id;
> > + if (rte_dma_completed_status(dev_id, vchan, 1, &id,
> &status) != 0)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error with
> rte_dma_completed_status when no job done\n");
> > + if (id != id_count)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error:incorrect job id received
> when no job done, %u [expected %u]\n",
> > + id, 0);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_src; i++)
> > + rte_pktmbuf_free(src[i]);
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_dst; i++)
> > + rte_pktmbuf_free(dst[i]);
> > +
> > + /* Verify that completion returns nothing more */
> > + if (rte_dma_completed(dev_id, 0, 1, NULL, NULL) != 0)
> > + ERR_RETURN("Error with rte_dma_completed
> in empty check\n");
>
> already verify this, no need do more
But this is against empty param check (as it is also done in plain copy test).
>
> > +
> > + id_count++;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Failure handling test cases - global macros and variables for those tests*/
> > #define COMP_BURST_SZ 16
> > #define OPT_FENCE(idx) ((fence && idx == 8) ? RTE_DMA_OP_FLAG_FENCE :
> > 0) @@ -1003,7 +1117,7 @@ test_dmadev_setup(void)
> > TEST_RINGSIZE * 2, /* n == num elements */
> > 32, /* cache size */
> > 0, /* priv size */
> > - 2048, /* data room size */
> > + COPY_LEN + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM, /* data
> room size */
> > info.numa_node);
> > if (pool == NULL)
> > ERR_RETURN("Error with mempool creation\n"); @@ -1026,6
> +1140,7 @@
> > test_dmadev_instance(int16_t dev_id)
> > #define CHECK_ERRS true
> > enum {
> > TEST_COPY = 0,
> > + TEST_COPY_SG,
> > TEST_START,
> > TEST_BURST,
> > TEST_ERR,
> > @@ -1060,6 +1175,13 @@ test_dmadev_instance(int16_t dev_id)
> > param[TEST_COPY].vchan = vchan;
> > param[TEST_COPY].check_err_stats = CHECK_ERRS;
> >
> > + param[TEST_COPY_SG].printable = "copy";
>
> should be SG copy.
Ack.
>
> > + param[TEST_COPY_SG].test_fn = test_enqueue_sg_copies;
> > + param[TEST_COPY_SG].iterations = 1;
> > + param[TEST_COPY_SG].dev_id = dev_id;
> > + param[TEST_COPY_SG].vchan = vchan;
> > + param[TEST_COPY_SG].check_err_stats = CHECK_ERRS;
> > +
> > param[TEST_START].printable = "stop-start";
> > param[TEST_START].test_fn = test_stop_start;
> > param[TEST_START].iterations = 1;
> > @@ -1122,6 +1244,12 @@ test_dmadev_instance(int16_t dev_id)
> > /* run tests stopping/starting devices and check jobs still work after
> restart */
> > ts->unit_test_cases[TEST_START].enabled = 1;
> >
> > + /* run SG test cases */
> > + if ((dev_info.dev_capa & RTE_DMA_CAPA_OPS_COPY_SG) == 0)
> > + printf("DMA Dev %u: No SG support, skipping SG copy tests\n",
> dev_id);
> > + else
> > + ts->unit_test_cases[TEST_COPY_SG].enabled = 1;
>
> suggest wrap it as test_dmadev_sg_copy_setup, just like
> test_dmadev_burst_setup
>
> > +
> > /* run some burst capacity tests */
> > ts->unit_test_cases[TEST_BURST].setup = test_dmadev_burst_setup;
> > ts->unit_test_cases[TEST_BURST].enabled = 1; diff --git
> > a/app/test/test_dmadev_api.c b/app/test/test_dmadev_api.c index
> > aa07d2b359..37e43c9336 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_dmadev_api.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_dmadev_api.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #include <rte_dmadev.h>
> >
> > #include "test.h"
> > +#include "test_dmadev_api.h"
> >
> > extern int test_dma_api(uint16_t dev_id);
> >
> > @@ -21,36 +22,62 @@ static int16_t invalid_dev_id;
> >
> > static char *src;
> > static char *dst;
> > +static char *src_sg[TEST_SG_MAX];
> > +static char *dst_sg[TEST_SG_MAX];
> >
> > static int
> > testsuite_setup(void)
> > {
> > invalid_dev_id = -1;
> > -
> > - src = rte_malloc("dmadev_test_src", TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE, 0);
> > - if (src == NULL)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > - dst = rte_malloc("dmadev_test_dst", TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE, 0);
> > - if (dst == NULL) {
> > - rte_free(src);
> > - src = NULL;
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + int i, rc = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < TEST_SG_MAX; i++) {
> > + src_sg[i] = rte_malloc("dmadev_test_src", TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE,
> 0);
> > + if (src_sg[i] == NULL) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto exit;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dst_sg[i] = rte_malloc("dmadev_test_dst", TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE,
> 0);
> > + if (dst_sg[i] == NULL) {
> > + rte_free(src_sg[i]);
> > + src_sg[i] = NULL;
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto exit;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > + src = src_sg[0];
> > + dst = dst_sg[0];
> > +
> > /* Set dmadev log level to critical to suppress unnecessary output
> > * during API tests.
> > */
> > rte_log_set_level_pattern("lib.dmadev", RTE_LOG_CRIT);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return rc;
> > +exit:
> > + while (--i >= 0) {
> > + rte_free(src_sg[i]);
> > + rte_free(dst_sg[i]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > testsuite_teardown(void)
> > {
> > - rte_free(src);
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < TEST_SG_MAX; i++) {
> > + rte_free(src_sg[i]);
> > + src_sg[i] = NULL;
> > + rte_free(dst_sg[i]);
> > + dst_sg[i] = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > src = NULL;
> > - rte_free(dst);
> > dst = NULL;
> > /* Ensure the dmadev is stopped. */
> > rte_dma_stop(test_dev_id);
> > @@ -437,6 +464,37 @@ verify_memory(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void
> > +sg_memory_setup(int n)
> > +{
> > + int i, j;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > + for (j = 0; j < TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE; j++)
> > + src_sg[i][j] = (char)j;
> > +
> > + memset(dst_sg[i], 0, TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +sg_memory_verify(int n)
> > +{
> > + int i, j;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > + for (j = 0; j < TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE; j++) {
> > + if (src_sg[i][j] == dst_sg[i][j])
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(src_sg[i][j], dst_sg[i][j],
> "Failed to copy memory, %d %d",
> > + src_sg[i][j], dst_sg[i][j]);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int
> > test_dma_completed(void)
> > {
> > @@ -551,6 +609,86 @@ test_dma_completed_status(void)
> > return TEST_SUCCESS;
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +test_dma_sg(void)
> > +{
> > + struct rte_dma_sge src_sge[TEST_SG_MAX], dst_sge[TEST_SG_MAX];
> > + struct rte_dma_info dev_info = { 0 };
> > + uint16_t last_idx = -1;
> > + bool has_error = true;
> > + int n_sge, i, ret;
> > + uint16_t cpl_ret;
> > +
> > + ret = rte_dma_info_get(test_dev_id, &dev_info);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to obtain device info, %d",
> > +ret);
> > +
> > + if ((dev_info.dev_capa & RTE_DMA_CAPA_OPS_COPY_SG) == 0)
> > + return TEST_SKIPPED;
> > +
> > + n_sge = RTE_MIN(dev_info.max_sges, TEST_SG_MAX);
> > +
> > + ret = setup_vchan(1);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to setup one vchan, %d", ret);
> > +
> > + ret = rte_dma_start(test_dev_id);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to start, %d", ret);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_sge; i++) {
> > + src_sge[i].addr = rte_malloc_virt2iova(src_sg[i]);
> > + src_sge[i].length = TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE;
> > + dst_sge[i].addr = rte_malloc_virt2iova(dst_sg[i]);
> > + dst_sge[i].length = TEST_MEMCPY_SIZE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + sg_memory_setup(n_sge);
> > +
> > + /* Check enqueue without submit */
> > + ret = rte_dma_copy_sg(test_dev_id, 0, src_sge, dst_sge, n_sge, n_sge,
> 0);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(ret, 0, "Failed to enqueue copy, %d", ret);
> > +
> > + rte_delay_us_sleep(TEST_WAIT_US_VAL);
> > +
> > + cpl_ret = rte_dma_completed(test_dev_id, 0, 1, &last_idx, &has_error);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(cpl_ret, 0, "Failed to get completed");
> > +
> > + /* Check DMA submit */
> > + ret = rte_dma_submit(test_dev_id, 0);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to submit, %d", ret);
> > +
> > + rte_delay_us_sleep(TEST_WAIT_US_VAL);
> > +
> > + cpl_ret = rte_dma_completed(test_dev_id, 0, 1, &last_idx, &has_error);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(cpl_ret, 1, "Failed to get completed");
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(last_idx, 0, "Last idx should be zero, %u",
> last_idx);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(has_error, false, "Should have no error");
> > +
> > + ret = sg_memory_verify(n_sge);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to verify memory");
> > +
> > + sg_memory_setup(n_sge);
> > +
> > + /* Check for enqueue with submit */
> > + ret = rte_dma_copy_sg(test_dev_id, 0, src_sge, dst_sge, n_sge, n_sge,
> > + RTE_DMA_OP_FLAG_SUBMIT);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(ret, 1, "Failed to enqueue copy, %d", ret);
> > +
> > + rte_delay_us_sleep(TEST_WAIT_US_VAL);
> > +
> > + cpl_ret = rte_dma_completed(test_dev_id, 0, 1, &last_idx, &has_error);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(cpl_ret, 1, "Failed to get completed");
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(last_idx, 1, "Last idx should be 1, %u",
> last_idx);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(has_error, false, "Should have no error");
> > +
> > + ret = sg_memory_verify(n_sge);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to verify memory");
> > +
> > + /* Stop dmadev to make sure dmadev to a known state */
> > + ret = rte_dma_stop(test_dev_id);
> > + RTE_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to stop, %d", ret);
> > +
> > + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct unit_test_suite dma_api_testsuite = {
> > .suite_name = "DMA API Test Suite",
> > .setup = testsuite_setup,
> > @@ -568,6 +706,7 @@ static struct unit_test_suite dma_api_testsuite = {
> > TEST_CASE(test_dma_dump),
> > TEST_CASE(test_dma_completed),
> > TEST_CASE(test_dma_completed_status),
> > + TEST_CASE(test_dma_sg),
> > TEST_CASES_END()
> > }
> > };
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_dmadev_api.h b/app/test/test_dmadev_api.h
> > index 33fbc5bd41..10ab925f80 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_dmadev_api.h
> > +++ b/app/test/test_dmadev_api.h
> > @@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
> > * Copyright(c) 2021 HiSilicon Limited
> > */
> >
> > +#define TEST_SG_MAX 4
>
> suggest TEST_MAX_SGES which corresponding dev_info.max_sges
Ok, I have fixed API test to validate against max_ages.
Thanks,
Gowrishankar
>
> Thanks
> Chengwen
>
> > +
> > int test_dma_api(uint16_t dev_id);
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-13 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 11:59 [PATCH] test/dma: add test skip status Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-08-10 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-08-10 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] test/dma: add test skip status Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-08-10 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] test/dma: test vchan reconfiguration Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-08-10 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] test/dma: use unit test framework Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-06 3:47 ` fengchengwen
2023-11-13 9:28 ` [EXT] " Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] test/dma: test vchan reconfiguration Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-06 4:06 ` fengchengwen
2023-11-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-06 6:43 ` fengchengwen
2023-11-13 9:27 ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan [this message]
2023-11-13 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-13 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] test/dma: use unit test framework Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-13 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] test/dma: test multiple vchan Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-13 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 7:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests fengchengwen
2023-11-16 10:40 ` [PATCH v5 " Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 10:40 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] test/dma: use unit test framework Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 10:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] test/dma: test multiple vchan Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 10:40 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 10:59 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 10:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] test/dma: use unit test framework Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 10:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] test/dma: test multiple vchan Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 10:59 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 13:27 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 13:27 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] test/dma: use unit test framework Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 13:27 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] test/dma: test multiple vchan Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 13:27 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 17:45 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 17:45 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] test/dma: use unit test framework Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 17:45 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] test/dma: test multiple vchan Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-11-16 17:45 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] test/dma: add SG copy tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-12-07 10:10 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] test/dma: add vchan reconfig and SG tests Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2024-02-05 10:34 ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2024-03-06 19:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-08 1:51 ` [PATCH] test/dma: add test skip status fengchengwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO1PR18MB4714A660072A97DB7CB0DD98CBB3A@CO1PR18MB4714.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gmuthukrishn@marvell.com \
--cc=amitprakashs@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
--cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
--cc=vvelumuri@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).