From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
"Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:45:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484944DEBF61BB15CAC065FD8D39@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB5013717BB7280BB4B73F55F49FD39@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> > Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable
> APIs?
> > I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it
> > experimental Forever.
> > The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leave them as
> > experimental And mark the others as stable.
> We could potentially make capability related functions stable but for others
> there are still some many uncertainties, another example:
> Ecdsa op expects 'k' in "in the interval (1, n-1)", openssl pmd will not even
> have function that accepts 'k' (although optionally inverse of k yes), what
> should user put then here?
>
> This API needs more attention I believe, I can send patches for it after 21.11
> release.
> My opinion is that we should push all this by another year.
>
Ok will drop this patch for now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-07 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-31 18:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable Akhil Goyal
2021-08-30 15:49 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-03 15:17 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 11:42 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-09-07 11:45 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-09-08 12:37 ` Kinsella, Ray
2023-02-02 10:49 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-02-02 11:02 ` Hemant Agrawal
2023-02-14 18:05 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:54 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-31 18:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 15:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-15 16:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-31 18:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev and security ABI improvements Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Akhil Goyal
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12 8:50 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-08 20:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11 8:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 16:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-11 22:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-10-12 8:31 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 6:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 8:53 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 8:50 ` [dpdk-dev] " Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-11 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] cryptodev: remove LIST_END enumerators Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-10-12 9:55 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-10-12 10:50 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:28 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 11:34 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 11:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 13:38 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 13:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 14:18 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-12 14:47 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-12 15:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13 5:36 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13 7:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-13 7:04 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-10-13 8:39 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-18 5:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] security: hide internal API Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18 5:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] security: add reserved bitfields Akhil Goyal
2021-10-18 15:39 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484944DEBF61BB15CAC065FD8D39@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).