DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Gagandeep Singh <G.Singh@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2] app/test-crypto-perf: fix segment size for IPsec operation
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:36:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484A69C689953493D4AB1D4D89A9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR04MB8198AE47C34F7CA8C0FB07FFE1999@AS8PR04MB8198.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

> > Can you explain the calculation for 73 bytes in the code?
> > Will it be sufficient for IPv6?
> No, it will not cover IPv6, As currently only IPv4 test cases are there in the
> app.
> But I guess it covers all the scenario which are supported by the app.
> 73 are the maximum bytes which can be added in
> AES - SHA  algo mode (41 +12 + 20 (including any padding))

Please explain and define macros appropriately so that we know what all is
Covered in 73Bytes. Or why not increase it by RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM.

> 
> But it will also not cover other complex scenario like NAT-T, AH.
> I have verified this change with aes-cbc-hmac-sha1 and aes-gcm algos for
> 64,128,256, 512, 1280 bytes.
> 
>  What's your opinion on this?
> 
I believe using RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM will resolve most of the scenarios.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-17  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-16 10:23 [PATCH] " Gagandeep Singh
2021-11-16 10:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Gagandeep Singh
2021-11-16 10:42   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-11-16 11:47     ` Gagandeep Singh
2021-11-17  6:36       ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-11-17  7:00         ` Gagandeep Singh
2021-11-17  7:40   ` [PATCH v3] " Gagandeep Singh
2021-11-23 19:49     ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484A69C689953493D4AB1D4D89A9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=G.Singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).