DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"g.singh@nxp.com" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] security: enforce semantics for Tx inline processing
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 09:13:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484BC759E24450C82D7E871D81B9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624102848.3878788-1-gakhil@marvell.com>

Hi Konstantin/ Olivier,

Could you please review this patch? This has also an update in documentation of mbuf.

Regards, 
Akhil

> From: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> 
> For Tx inline processing, when RTE_SECURITY_TX_OLOAD_NEED_MDATA is
> set, rte_security_set_pkt_metadata() needs to be called for pkts
> to associate a Security session with a mbuf before submitting
> to Ethdev Tx. This is apart from setting PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD in
> mbuf.ol_flags. rte_security_set_pkt_metadata() is also used to
> set some opaque metadata in mbuf for PMD's use.
> This patch updates documentation that rte_security_set_pkt_metadata()
> should be called only with mbuf containing Layer 3 and above data.
> This behaviour is consistent with existing PMD's such as ixgbe.
> 
> On Tx, not all net PMD's/HW can parse packet and identify
> L2 header and L3 header locations on Tx. This is inline with other
> Tx offloads requirements such as L3 checksum, L4 checksum offload,
> etc, where mbuf.l2_len, mbuf.l3_len etc, needs to be set for
> HW to be able to generate checksum. Since Inline IPSec is also
> such a Tx offload, some PMD's at least need mbuf.l2_len to be
> valid to find L3 header and perform Outbound IPSec processing.
> Hence, this patch updates documentation to enforce setting
> mbuf.l2_len while setting PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD in mbuf.ol_flags
> for Inline IPSec Crypto / Protocol offload processing to
> work on Tx.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> Reviewed-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-06  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24 10:28 Akhil Goyal
2021-06-24 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: modify event mode inline path Akhil Goyal
2021-07-06  9:13 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-07-06 10:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] security: enforce semantics for Tx inline processing Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-06 12:27   ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-06 12:42     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-06 12:58       ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-06 14:07         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-07  9:07           ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-07  9:59             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-07 11:22               ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-10 12:57                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-12 17:01                   ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-13 12:33                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-13 14:08                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-13 15:58                         ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-14 11:09                           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-14 13:29                             ` Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-14 17:28                               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-15  6:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] security: Improve inline fast path routines Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-15  6:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] security: enforce semantics for Tx inline processing Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-15  6:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] security: add option for faster udata or mdata access Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-07-15  6:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: update L2 length for Tx Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-08-10  6:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] security: Improve inline fast path routines Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-08-10  6:07   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] security: enforce semantics for Tx inline processing Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-08-10  6:07   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] security: add option for faster udata or mdata access Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-08-10  6:07   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: update event mode inline path Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-08-12 12:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] security: Improve inline fast path routines Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-08-12 12:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] security: enforce semantics for Tx inline processing Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-06 18:58     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-08-12 12:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] security: add option for faster udata or mdata access Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-06 18:58     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-06 18:59     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-08-12 12:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] examples/ipsec-secgw: update event mode inline path Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-06 18:59     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-08-12 12:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] doc: remove deprecation notice for security fast path change Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-06 18:57     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-14 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] security: Improve inline fast path routines Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-14 15:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] security: enforce semantics for Tx inline processing Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-15 14:25     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-14 15:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] security: add option for faster udata or mdata access Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-15 14:33     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-14 15:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: update event mode inline path Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-15 14:34     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-15 16:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] security: Improve inline fast path routines Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-15 16:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] security: enforce semantics for Tx inline processing Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-21 13:50     ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 16:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] security: add option for faster udata or mdata access Nithin Dabilpuram
2021-09-27 17:10     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-28  8:24       ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-09-15 16:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: update event mode inline path Nithin Dabilpuram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484BC759E24450C82D7E871D81B9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).