From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cunming.liang@intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0CDC33A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 03:46:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2016 18:46:22 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,463,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="918144863"
Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2016 18:46:22 -0800
Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) by
 fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:46:21 -0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by
 FMSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:46:21 -0800
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.249]) by
 shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.172]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:46:19 +0800
From: "Liang, Cunming" <cunming.liang@intel.com>
To: "Yang, Ziye" <ziye.yang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] PCI: ABI change request for adding new
 field	in rte_pci_id structure
Thread-Index: AQHRaSfGZJ+002ftf0C7k+CbP6sRGZ8xGVqw
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:46:18 +0000
Message-ID: <D0158A423229094DA7ABF71CF2FA0DA314AFE340@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1455596119-4613-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com>
 <1455674073-16579-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1455674073-16579-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Yang, Ziye" <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] PCI: ABI change request for adding new
 field	in rte_pci_id structure
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:46:23 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ziye Yang
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:55 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Ziye
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] PCI: ABI change request for adding new fie=
ld in
> rte_pci_id structure
>=20
> From: Ziye <ziye.yang@intel.com>
>=20
> The purpose of this patch is used to add a new field
> "class" in rte_pci_id structure. The new class field includes
> class_id, subcalss_id, programming interface of a pci device.
> With this field, we can identify pci device by its class info,
> which can be more flexible instead of probing the device by
> vendor_id OR device_id OR subvendor_id OR subdevice_id.
> For example, we can probe all nvme devices by class field, which
> can be quite convenient.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>

It's better to use "doc:" as subject prefix, the others are good to go.
Acked-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>