From: "Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"Vladimir Medvedkin" <medvedkinv@gmail.com>,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, "Sunil Kumar Kori" <skori@marvell.com>,
"Rakesh Kudurumalla" <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>,
"Vladimir Medvedkin" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
"Wisam Jaddo" <wisamm@nvidia.com>,
"Cristian Dumitrescu" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
"Akhil Goyal" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
"Fan Zhang" <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>,
"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Yipeng Wang" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
"Sameh Gobriel" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
"Nithin Dabilpuram" <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
"Kiran Kumar K" <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
"Satha Rao" <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
"Harman Kalra" <hkalra@marvell.com>,
"Ankur Dwivedi" <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
"Anoob Joseph" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"Tejasree Kondoj" <ktejasree@marvell.com>,
"Gagandeep Singh" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"Hemant Agrawal" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"Ajit Khaparde" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
"Somnath Kotur" <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>,
"Chas Williams" <chas3@att.com>,
"Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>,
"Potnuri Bharat Teja" <bharat@chelsio.com>,
"Sachin Saxena" <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
"Ziyang Xuan" <xuanziyang2@huawei.com>,
"Xiaoyun Wang" <cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com>,
"Jie Hai" <haijie1@huawei.com>,
"Yisen Zhuang" <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
"Jingjing Wu" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"Dariusz Sosnowski" <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>,
"Viacheslav Ovsiienko" <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
"Bing Zhao" <bingz@nvidia.com>, "Ori Kam" <orika@nvidia.com>,
"Suanming Mou" <suanmingm@nvidia.com>,
"Matan Azrad" <matan@nvidia.com>,
"Chaoyong He" <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>,
"Devendra Singh Rawat" <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>,
"Alok Prasad" <palok@marvell.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"Jiawen Wu" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>,
"Jian Wang" <jianwang@trustnetic.com>,
"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"Jiayu Hu" <hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com>,
"Pavan Nikhilesh" <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"Chenbo Xia" <chenbox@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 APIs rework
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:09:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D2TGW93BE36N.3G2FPPOUKJOLM@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F5AE@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
Morten Brørup, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:46:
> When passing an IPv4 address as a value, alignment does matter; it
> must be 4 byte aligned.
I was expecting the compiler to do what is necessary to copy the data to
an aligned register before jumping to the function.
> On a CPU with 128 bit registers, I would probably also pass an IPv6
> address as a value. With such a CPU, the parameter type should be
> uint128_t or rte_be128_t, depending on byte order.
I don't think there is a portable/standard uint128_t yet. Everything
I could find is either GCC or linux specific.
> There's a 3rd option:
> Have an IPv6 type that is simply an array of 16 bytes with no explicitly specified alignment:
>
> struct rte_ipv6_addr {
> unsigned char addr_bytes[RTE_IPV6_ADDR_LEN];
> };
>
> Or:
>
> typedef struct rte_ipv6_addr {
> unsigned char addr_bytes[RTE_IPV6_ADDR_LEN];
> } rte_ipv6_addr_t;
>
> If used as is, it will be unaligned.
>
> And if alignment offers improved performance for some use cases,
> explicit alignment attributes can be added to the type in those use
> cases.
>
> Not using an uint128_t type (or a union of other types than unsigned
> char) will also avoid byte order issues.
>
> I guess Stephen was right to begin with. :-)
Having the type as a union (as is the POSIX type) makes casting to
integers a lot less tedious and makes the structure overall more
flexible.
We could completely add an unaligned be128 member to the union by the
way. I don't see what is wrong with having sub union members.
About your concern with byte order, since the union members have
explicit rte_be*_t types, I don't think confusion can happen. I have
also renamed the members, replacing the "u" prefix with "a" so that it
does not indicate that it should be used as a host integer.
struct __rte_aligned(1) rte_ipv6_addr {
union {
unsigned char a[16];
unaligned_be16_t a16[8];
unaligned_be32_t a32[4];
unaligned_be64_t a64[2];
unaligned_be128_t a128[1];
};
} __rte_packed;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-19 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-18 15:03 Robin Jarry
2024-07-18 20:27 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-18 21:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-18 21:40 ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-18 21:25 ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2024-07-18 21:34 ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-19 8:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-07-19 9:12 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 10:02 ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-19 10:09 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-07-19 10:46 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 11:09 ` Robin Jarry [this message]
2024-07-19 15:47 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 17:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-20 17:43 ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-20 20:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-20 20:33 ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-21 16:12 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-21 21:51 ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-22 9:31 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 10:41 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D2TGW93BE36N.3G2FPPOUKJOLM@redhat.com \
--to=rjarry@redhat.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
--cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chaoyong.he@corigine.com \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=chenbox@nvidia.com \
--cc=cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dsinghrawat@marvell.com \
--cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=haijie1@huawei.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=jianwang@trustnetic.com \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=ktejasree@marvell.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=medvedkinv@gmail.com \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=palok@marvell.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=rkudurumalla@marvell.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=skori@marvell.com \
--cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=wisamm@nvidia.com \
--cc=xuanziyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).