DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Vladimir Medvedkin" <medvedkinv@gmail.com>,
	stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, "Sunil Kumar Kori" <skori@marvell.com>,
	"Rakesh Kudurumalla" <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>,
	"Vladimir Medvedkin" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	"Wisam Jaddo" <wisamm@nvidia.com>,
	"Cristian Dumitrescu" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
	"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
	"Akhil Goyal" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	"Fan Zhang" <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Yipeng Wang" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
	"Sameh Gobriel" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
	"Nithin Dabilpuram" <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	"Kiran Kumar K" <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	"Satha Rao" <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
	"Harman Kalra" <hkalra@marvell.com>,
	"Ankur Dwivedi" <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
	"Anoob Joseph" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"Tejasree Kondoj" <ktejasree@marvell.com>,
	"Gagandeep Singh" <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	"Hemant Agrawal" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"Ajit Khaparde" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	"Somnath Kotur" <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>,
	"Chas Williams" <chas3@att.com>,
	"Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>,
	"Potnuri Bharat Teja" <bharat@chelsio.com>,
	"Sachin Saxena" <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
	"Ziyang Xuan" <xuanziyang2@huawei.com>,
	"Xiaoyun Wang" <cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com>,
	"Jie Hai" <haijie1@huawei.com>,
	"Yisen Zhuang" <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
	"Jingjing Wu" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Dariusz Sosnowski" <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>,
	"Viacheslav Ovsiienko" <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	"Bing Zhao" <bingz@nvidia.com>, "Ori Kam" <orika@nvidia.com>,
	"Suanming Mou" <suanmingm@nvidia.com>,
	"Matan Azrad" <matan@nvidia.com>,
	"Chaoyong He" <chaoyong.he@corigine.com>,
	"Devendra Singh Rawat" <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>,
	"Alok Prasad" <palok@marvell.com>,
	"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"Jiawen Wu" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>,
	"Jian Wang" <jianwang@trustnetic.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	"Jiayu Hu" <hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com>,
	"Pavan Nikhilesh" <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"Chenbo Xia" <chenbox@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 APIs rework
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:09:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D2TGW93BE36N.3G2FPPOUKJOLM@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F5AE@smartserver.smartshare.dk>

Morten Brørup, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:46:
> When passing an IPv4 address as a value, alignment does matter; it 
> must be 4 byte aligned.

I was expecting the compiler to do what is necessary to copy the data to 
an aligned register before jumping to the function.

> On a CPU with 128 bit registers, I would probably also pass an IPv6 
> address as a value. With such a CPU, the parameter type should be 
> uint128_t or rte_be128_t, depending on byte order.

I don't think there is a portable/standard uint128_t yet. Everything 
I could find is either GCC or linux specific.

> There's a 3rd option:
> Have an IPv6 type that is simply an array of 16 bytes with no explicitly specified alignment:
>
> struct rte_ipv6_addr {
> 	unsigned char addr_bytes[RTE_IPV6_ADDR_LEN];
> };
>
> Or:
>
> typedef struct rte_ipv6_addr {
> 	unsigned char addr_bytes[RTE_IPV6_ADDR_LEN];
> } rte_ipv6_addr_t;
>
> If used as is, it will be unaligned.
>
> And if alignment offers improved performance for some use cases, 
> explicit alignment attributes can be added to the type in those use 
> cases.
>
> Not using an uint128_t type (or a union of other types than unsigned 
> char) will also avoid byte order issues.
>
> I guess Stephen was right to begin with. :-)

Having the type as a union (as is the POSIX type) makes casting to 
integers a lot less tedious and makes the structure overall more 
flexible.

We could completely add an unaligned be128 member to the union by the 
way. I don't see what is wrong with having sub union members.

About your concern with byte order, since the union members have 
explicit rte_be*_t types, I don't think confusion can happen. I have 
also renamed the members, replacing the "u" prefix with "a" so that it 
does not indicate that it should be used as a host integer.

        struct __rte_aligned(1) rte_ipv6_addr {
                union {
                        unsigned char a[16];
                        unaligned_be16_t a16[8];
                        unaligned_be32_t a32[4];
                        unaligned_be64_t a64[2];
                        unaligned_be128_t a128[1];
                };
        } __rte_packed;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-19 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-18 15:03 Robin Jarry
2024-07-18 20:27 ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-18 21:15   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-18 21:40     ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-18 21:25   ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2024-07-18 21:34     ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-19  8:25       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-07-19  9:12       ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 10:02         ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-19 10:09           ` Bruce Richardson
2024-07-19 10:46           ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 11:09             ` Robin Jarry [this message]
2024-07-19 15:47               ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 17:07                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-20 17:43                   ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-20 20:26                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-20 20:33                       ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-21 16:12                         ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-21 21:51                           ` Robin Jarry
2024-07-22  9:31                             ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-19 10:41         ` Medvedkin, Vladimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D2TGW93BE36N.3G2FPPOUKJOLM@redhat.com \
    --to=rjarry@redhat.com \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
    --cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=chaoyong.he@corigine.com \
    --cc=chas3@att.com \
    --cc=chenbox@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsinghrawat@marvell.com \
    --cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=haijie1@huawei.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
    --cc=hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com \
    --cc=humin29@huawei.com \
    --cc=jianwang@trustnetic.com \
    --cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=ktejasree@marvell.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=medvedkinv@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=palok@marvell.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=rkudurumalla@marvell.com \
    --cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
    --cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    --cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
    --cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=wisamm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xuanziyang2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).