From: Harish Patil <harish.patil@qlogic.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@qlogic.com>
Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Ameen Rahman <ameen.rahman@qlogic.com>,
Sony Chacko <sony.chacko@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/10] qede: Add core driver
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:23:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D3219E72.1890A2%harish.patil@qlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330094029.49117ab9@xeon-e3>
>
>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:28:20 -0700
>Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@qlogic.com> wrote:
>
>> +static void
>> +qede_mac_addr_remove(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
>> + __rte_unused uint32_t index)
>> +{
>> + struct qede_dev *qdev = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
>> + struct ecore_dev *edev = &qdev->edev;
>> +
>> + /* TBD: Not implemented currently because DPDK does not provide
>> + * macaddr and instead just passes the index. So pmd needs to
>> + * maintain index mapping to macaddr.
>> + */
>> + DP_NOTICE(edev, false, "%s: Unsupported operation\n", __func__);
>> +}
>> +
>
>Rather than have a stub and break software, why not just
>not define the operation and let base DPDK handle the error?
>
Okay. I shall have it implemented and not leave it as stubbed one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-30 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 5:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/10] qede: Add qede PMD Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/10] qede: Add maintainers Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/10] qede: Add documentation Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/10] qede: Add license file Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/10] qede: Add base driver Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/10] qede: Add core driver Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 16:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 22:16 ` Harish Patil
2016-03-30 22:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-31 19:36 ` Harish Patil
2016-03-31 21:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 16:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 22:23 ` Harish Patil [this message]
2016-03-30 16:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 16:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-31 7:03 ` Harish Patil
2016-03-30 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/10] qede: Add L2 support Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/10] qede: Add SRIOV support Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/10] qede: Add attention support Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/10] qede: Add DCBX support Rasesh Mody
2016-03-30 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/10] qede: Enable PMD build Rasesh Mody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D3219E72.1890A2%harish.patil@qlogic.com \
--to=harish.patil@qlogic.com \
--cc=ameen.rahman@qlogic.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=rasesh.mody@qlogic.com \
--cc=sony.chacko@qlogic.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).