From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4A1459D6; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359B543334; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CB343330 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:09:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1726747764; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=P7D4EjvzwziRGAEAjLO6qyvlPVD/WorZ2QUyyq7SHVk=; b=WsDuq1oL9Sbfq+T4NSNBL0/zOaGDoBDImRHQjoiSL3Bi5ys/4HCcExXRHIoBnbhRmjlM77 HrwVq4zJBQuk8U1hQpjfCsQZmNqo4a6dGA0yXc6vxxRHf/nKxFEJgom+qA0s63ukZZB21b qdOlxkByY8zYy7bRb9xse65zS/QYF38= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-81-MuipA3CfMcOLkeRqc9FWyg-1; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:09:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MuipA3CfMcOLkeRqc9FWyg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb808e9fcso4721155e9.0 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:09:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726747762; x=1727352562; h=in-reply-to:references:user-agent:to:from:cc:subject:message-id :date:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=P7D4EjvzwziRGAEAjLO6qyvlPVD/WorZ2QUyyq7SHVk=; b=Rd862bJ2qvH+9g6Wfd+AkAC61hSNa6r1qIIaMOlOir9vpb4D9KYQuBtcVh6ho/iZEt HtYx9uWksStG4pd6kQUkHowtmlsypIxNldFEt1mJa4K3pKPc6FcV+inKU5z74911jqxE 3i6jEHvDTZDo7E5TJYqwON776CRrIWx5Kgocyj8YIU4tMMj0H1tNYkB9ExRrrLMR1FzH A1HHqONr1NvTts49NmV8w6GUUMwTDJR6kYj5ATeJrOR7wOyTaJ2iCMeDKB8kvWd+CU/D 7fpbNh/P26HgfYdgZdxc/pYzuzBBGcy9s5vQeG66xJKgk0R178OT2dxXBZ02l/rVXfzN Phog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxhg+VZWxD0ZxJerwj7xcnD7BKgo47Su3zz6JNJyUtBFSZCU5vK m0289v4HYbhUGcNe7dI0zmoPaK1M3w6HISSTq80roW+dgnycaUi8gzs2iKXTCTLDxD8m2IG/6ck t+Ye43Q37MpZ9Qidlg/CrJV5zK+NRNADE6g40c4MgEDvWsBhq X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5127:b0:42c:a8f8:1d58 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42d9070d642mr165180495e9.7.1726747761407; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:09:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHc/8Sq2TZurGlLbaF8zJdSdkrJCPy77FUeKSImLEHi7hnh4O2koinVgOBRxe0dA9sOwxYz0g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5127:b0:42c:a8f8:1d58 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42d9070d642mr165180215e9.7.1726747760930; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (2a01cb00025433006239e1f47a0b2371.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb00:254:3300:6239:e1f4:7a0b:2371]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-42e754091d3sm20442295e9.10.2024.09.19.05.09.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:09:20 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] simplify doing 32-bit DPDK builds Cc: From: "Robin Jarry" To: "David Marchand" , "Bruce Richardson" User-Agent: aerc/0.18.2-62-g3b42f3130eb7-dirty References: <20240904135939.329324-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20240906161244.1663967-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=Flowed X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org David Marchand, Sep 19, 2024 at 13:32: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 1:15=E2=80=AFPM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:08:21AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:02=E2=80=AFAM Bruce Richardson > > > wrote: > > > > Overall, I think we haven't increased our minimum meson version in = some > > > > time. Maybe it's time to consider doing so in this release or the n= ext one? > > > > Need to look through release notes to see how far forward to jump t= o see > > > > what extra features might be useful for us to leverage. > > > > > > That's an option, just be careful that there is some tie with python > > > versions iirc. > > > > > Right. Do we have a minimum python version from various distros that we > > need to support? > > We have a minimum version (3.6) in DPDK, harder to tell with all the > distros around. > Robin, any idea/guidance? 3.6 is really old. I think it is safe to bump it to at least 3.9. https://repology.org/project/python/badges It depends how backwards compatible DPDK wants to remain.