DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>,
	Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Asaf Penso <asafp@mellanox.com>,
	Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: document RSS default key and types
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 23:07:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D76B1B91-122C-4165-9E18-9762BA61DE6D@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0502MB374323DEBEC30EFD353EF19BD1C50@VI1PR0502MB3743.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>


> On Nov 8, 2018, at 12:50 AM, Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 6:41 PM
>> To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
>> Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
>> <arybchenko@solarflare.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
>> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Asaf Penso <asafp@mellanox.com>; Shahaf
>> Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: document RSS default key and
>> types
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 03:13:07PM +0000, Ophir Munk wrote:
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 4:06 PM
>>>> To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
>>>> Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
>>>> <arybchenko@solarflare.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
>>>> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Asaf Penso <asafp@mellanox.com>; Shahaf
>>>> Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: document RSS default key
>>>> and types
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 12:39:24PM +0000, Ophir Munk wrote:
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 11:31 AM
>>>>>> To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
>>>>>> <arybchenko@solarflare.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
>>>>>> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Asaf Penso <asafp@mellanox.com>;
>> Shahaf
>>>>>> Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; Olga Shern
>> <olgas@mellanox.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: document RSS default
>>>>>> key and types
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:23:42AM +0000, Ophir Munk wrote:
>>>>>>> struct rte_flow_action_rss include fields 'key' and 'types'.
>>>>>>> Field 'key' is a pointer to bytes array (uint8_t *) which
>>>>>>> contains the specific RSS hash key.
>>>>>>> If an application is only interested in default RSS operation
>>>>>>> it should not care about the specific hash key. The
>>>>>>> application can set the hash key to NULL such that any PMD uses its
>> default RSS key.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Field 'types' is a uint64_t bits flag used to specify a
>>>>>>> specific RSS hash type such as ETH_RSS_IP (see ETH_RSS_*).
>>>>>>> If an application does not care about the specific RSS type it
>>>>>>> can set this field to 0 such that any PMD uses its default type.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 9 +++++++--
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>>>>> b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h index c0fe879..ca9e135 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>>>>>> @@ -1782,10 +1782,15 @@ struct rte_flow_action_rss {
>>>>>>> 	 * through.
>>>>>>> 	 */
>>>>>>> 	uint32_t level;
>>>>>>> -	uint64_t types; /**< Specific RSS hash types (see
>> ETH_RSS_*). */
>>>>>>> +	/**
>>>>>>> +	 * Specific RSS hash types (see ETH_RSS_*),
>>>>>>> +	 * or 0 for PMD specific default.
>>>>>>> +	 */
>>>>>>> +	uint64_t types;
>>>>>>> 	uint32_t key_len; /**< Hash key length in bytes. */
>>>>>>> 	uint32_t queue_num; /**< Number of entries in @p queue.
>> */
>>>>>>> -	const uint8_t *key; /**< Hash key. */
>>>>>>> +	/** Hash key, or NULL for PMD specific default key. */
>>>>>>> +	const uint8_t *key;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd suggest to document that on key_len instead. If key_len is
>>>>>> nonzero, key cannot be NULL anyway.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The decision if a key/len combination is valid is done in the PMD
>>>>> action
>>>> validation API.
>>>>> For example, in MLX5 key==NULL and key_len==40 is accepted.
>>>>> The combination key==NULL and key_len==0 should always succeeds,
>>>> however the "must" parameter for RSS default is key==NULL and not
>>>> key_len==0.
>>>> 
>>>> I understand this is how the mlx5 PMD implemented it, but my point
>>>> is that it makes more sense API-wise to define key_len == 0 as the
>>>> trigger for a default RSS hash key than key == NULL.
>>>> 
>>>> My suggestion is to follow the same trend as memcpy(), mmap(),
>>>> snprintf() and other well-known functions that take a size when
>>>> dealing with NULL/undefined pointers. Only size matters! :)
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please let's stay backward compatible and consistent with previous
>>> dpdk releases where key==NULL is used in struct rte_eth_rss_conf (see
>> code snippet in [1]).
>> 
>> And I thought I wouldn't hear again from that structure after ac8d22de2394
>> ("ethdev: flatten RSS configuration in flow API") got rid of it in rte_flow
>> :)
>> 
>> There is no need to be backward compatible with it particularly if doing so
>> improves consistency (assuming you agree it does).
>> 
>> Take "rss_hf" versus "types" fields for instance [2]. Unsetting the former
>> disables RSS completely while unsetting the latter provides default RSS
>> settings for that flow rule, simply because a RSS action that doesn't do RSS
>> makes no sense (one could provide a single queue for that).
>> 
>> Regarding "key_len", have a look at this other message [3] in the same
>> thread which clearly states that i40e expects a zero key length to trigger
>> default RSS, it doesn't rely on a NULL pointer.
>> 
>> Generally speaking, I'm pushing for zero values in action objects to result in a
>> safe default behavior. A nonzero key_len with a NULL key may result in a
>> crash, while the reverse is inherently safer since one doesn't even need to
>> check the size or pointer validity, e.g.:
>> 
>> memcpy(target_device_rss_stuff, rss_conf->key, rss_conf->key_len);
>> 
>> What's not to like?
>> 
> 
> Some think key==NULL && key_len!=0 is senseless while other think key!=NULL && key_len==0 is senseless.
> Let's agree on both key==NULL && key_len==0.

A bug's already been found by our QA team. The following command crashes.
  flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / udp / end actions rss queues 0 end level 2 types udp end key_len 40 / end

due to null pointer access in the following code:

lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ rte_flow_conv_action_conf(void *buf, const size_t size,
                           }),
                           size > sizeof(*dst.rss) ? sizeof(*dst.rss) : size);
                off = sizeof(*dst.rss);
                if (src.rss->key_len) {
                        off = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(off, sizeof(*dst.rss->key));
                        tmp = sizeof(*src.rss->key) * src.rss->key_len;
                        if (size >= off + tmp)
                                dst.rss->key = rte_memcpy
                                        ((void *)((uintptr_t)dst.rss + off),
                                         src.rss->key, tmp);
                        off += tmp;
                }


I wanted to submit a patch to add a sanity check,

-               if (src.rss->key_len) {
+               if (src.rss->key && src.rss->key_len) {

but looks like we should conclude this thread first?
Or, does the fix make any sense regardless of having key_len=0 or key=null for default key?
Having more sanity check is no harm usually...


Thanks,
Yongseok


> 
>> [2] "Re: [PATCH v2 07/15] ethdev: flatten RSS configuration in flow API"
>> 
>> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmai
>> ls.dpdk.org%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F2018-
>> April%2F096235.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cophirmu%40mellanox.com%
>> 7C4fdd2e5a838047c152c408d644cfe439%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d14925
>> 6f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636772057013784575&amp;sdata=6JsomMO68lJoiNd
>> ehRaNdn2xG9BSAgqCjxwpJJJOP8A%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> 
>> [3] "Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/16] ethdev: flatten RSS configuration in
>>    flow API"
>> 
>> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmai
>> ls.dpdk.org%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F2018-
>> May%2F100128.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cophirmu%40mellanox.com%7
>> C4fdd2e5a838047c152c408d644cfe439%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256
>> f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636772057013784575&amp;sdata=TXDTKLho8qyKlH%2
>> FqBturGHWhvdfaACuMoqvl0eOjfcU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> 
>>> We should avoid confusing applications with setting key==NULL with
>> legacy RSS and key_len==0 with rte_flows.
>>> 
>>> With regard to trends APIs - I was thinking about free() where a NULL
>>> pointer is acceptable :)
>> 
>> Yeah, though free() doesn't take a size. On the other hand the behavior of
>> realloc() is much more interesting when faced with a zero size :) That's
>> probably one of the few exceptions so I guess my point still stands.
>> 
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> File lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h:
>>> 
>>> /**
>>> * A structure used to configure the Receive Side Scaling (RSS)
>>> feature
>>> * of an Ethernet port.
>>> * If not NULL, the *rss_key* pointer of the *rss_conf* structure
>>> points
>>> * to an array holding the RSS key to use for hashing specific header
>>> * fields of received packets. The length of this array should be
>>> indicated
>>> * by *rss_key_len* below. Otherwise, a default random hash key is
>>> used by
>>> * the device driver.
>>> *
>>> * The *rss_key_len* field of the *rss_conf* structure indicates the
>>> length
>>> * in bytes of the array pointed by *rss_key*. To be compatible, this
>>> length
>>> * will be checked in i40e only. Others assume 40 bytes to be used as
>> before.
>>> *
>>> * ..........
>>> */
>>> struct rte_eth_rss_conf {
>>> 	uint8_t *rss_key;    /**< If not NULL, 40-byte hash key. */
>>> 	uint8_t rss_key_len; /**< hash key length in bytes. */
>>> 	uint64_t rss_hf;     /**< Hash functions to apply - see below. */
>>> };
>> 
>> --
>> Adrien Mazarguil
>> 6WIND

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-08 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-03 15:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " Ophir Munk
2018-11-05 13:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-11-05 21:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-07  9:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ophir Munk
2018-11-07  9:31   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-11-07 12:39     ` Ophir Munk
2018-11-07 14:06       ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-11-07 15:13         ` Ophir Munk
2018-11-07 16:41           ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-11-08  6:32             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-11-08  8:50             ` Ophir Munk
2018-11-08 23:07               ` Yongseok Koh [this message]
2018-11-09  8:13                 ` Ophir Munk
2018-11-11  9:35                   ` Ori Kam
2018-11-13 17:15                     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-11-13 18:04                       ` Ophir Munk
2018-11-13 18:39                       ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-11-14  9:40                         ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-11-14 13:51                           ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-11-14 15:16                             ` Adrien Mazarguil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D76B1B91-122C-4165-9E18-9762BA61DE6D@mellanox.com \
    --to=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=asafp@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=olgas@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).