From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
Ashish Gupta <ashish.gupta@marvell.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 18:40:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0802MB2216F04A2EF539CCC99F8AED988E0@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8y2QswXtKRQhhe2O41KeLyuqVQDmWBphd5L2qfF+5Ny=g@mail.gmail.com>
<snip>
>
> Hello Honnappa,
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:16 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
> > > * Wireless base band device abstraction APIs.
> > > *
> > > * @warning
> > > - * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL:
> > > + * All functions in this file may change or disappear without prior notice.
> > nit, is 'removed' a better choice instead of 'disappear'? May be something
> like:
> > All functions in this file may be changed or removed without prior notice.
>
> I used the same form than in the abi policy (that I wanted but forgot to
> update in patch 1 afterwards... will be fixed in v2).
>
> #. Libraries or APIs marked as :ref:`experimental <experimental_apis>` may
> change without constraint, as they are not considered part of an ABI version.
> Experimental libraries have the major ABI version ``0``.
>
> No strong opinion, but I prefer keeping a single phrasing.
> If we go with your suggestion, I will update the abi policy.
Agree on using the same wording.
IMO, we should capture the 'removed/disappear' wording in the ABI policy.
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 6:58 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup David Marchand
2020-05-22 6:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] build: remove special versioning for non stable libraries David Marchand
2020-05-22 6:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] drivers: drop workaround for internal libraries David Marchand
2020-05-22 6:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers David Marchand
2020-05-22 14:15 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-28 6:53 ` David Marchand
2020-05-28 18:40 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-05-26 13:28 ` Eads, Gage
2020-05-28 6:56 ` David Marchand
2020-06-25 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup David Marchand
2020-06-25 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] build: remove special versioning for non stable libraries David Marchand
2020-06-25 9:25 ` David Marchand
2020-06-25 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] drivers: drop workaround for internal libraries David Marchand
2020-06-25 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers David Marchand
2020-06-26 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup David Marchand
2020-06-26 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] build: remove special versioning for non stable libraries David Marchand
2020-06-26 8:38 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-26 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] drivers: drop workaround for internal libraries David Marchand
2020-06-26 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers David Marchand
2020-06-26 9:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH v3 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup Bruce Richardson
2020-07-07 10:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-05 19:55 ` [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-06 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2020-07-06 8:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-06 16:57 ` [dpdk-dev] " Medvedkin, Vladimir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB6PR0802MB2216F04A2EF539CCC99F8AED988E0@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=ashish.gupta@marvell.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).