DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
	Ashish Gupta <ashish.gupta@marvell.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 18:40:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0802MB2216F04A2EF539CCC99F8AED988E0@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8y2QswXtKRQhhe2O41KeLyuqVQDmWBphd5L2qfF+5Ny=g@mail.gmail.com>

<snip>

> 
> Hello Honnappa,
> 
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 4:16 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
> > >   * Wireless base band device abstraction APIs.
> > >   *
> > >   * @warning
> > > - * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL:
> > > + * All functions in this file may change or disappear without prior notice.
> > nit, is 'removed' a better choice instead of 'disappear'? May be something
> like:
> > All functions in this file may be changed or removed without prior notice.
> 
> I used the same form than in the abi policy (that I wanted but forgot to
> update in patch 1 afterwards... will be fixed in v2).
> 
> #. Libraries or APIs marked as :ref:`experimental <experimental_apis>` may
>    change without constraint, as they are not considered part of an ABI version.
>    Experimental libraries have the major ABI version ``0``.
> 
> No strong opinion, but I prefer keeping a single phrasing.
> If we go with your suggestion, I will update the abi policy.
Agree on using the same wording.
IMO, we should capture the 'removed/disappear' wording in the ABI policy.

> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-22  6:58 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup David Marchand
2020-05-22  6:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] build: remove special versioning for non stable libraries David Marchand
2020-05-22  6:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] drivers: drop workaround for internal libraries David Marchand
2020-05-22  6:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers David Marchand
2020-05-22 14:15   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-05-28  6:53     ` David Marchand
2020-05-28 18:40       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-05-26 13:28   ` Eads, Gage
2020-05-28  6:56     ` David Marchand
2020-06-25  7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup David Marchand
2020-06-25  7:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] build: remove special versioning for non stable libraries David Marchand
2020-06-25  9:25     ` David Marchand
2020-06-25  7:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] drivers: drop workaround for internal libraries David Marchand
2020-06-25  7:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers David Marchand
2020-06-26  8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup David Marchand
2020-06-26  8:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] build: remove special versioning for non stable libraries David Marchand
2020-06-26  8:38     ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-26  8:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] drivers: drop workaround for internal libraries David Marchand
2020-06-26  8:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] lib: remind experimental status in library headers David Marchand
2020-06-26  9:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH v3 0/3] Experimental/internal libraries cleanup Bruce Richardson
2020-07-07 10:50     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-05 19:55   ` [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-06  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] " Bruce Richardson
2020-07-06  8:12       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-06 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] " Medvedkin, Vladimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DB6PR0802MB2216F04A2EF539CCC99F8AED988E0@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=ashish.gupta@marvell.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).