From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CABBA0487 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:41:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4271BF24; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:41:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr130105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.13.105]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC8C1B945 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:41:37 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SUK227Vd3LPvYZCOX66D+qDOO7Wc9dyRqntU4V1g/qE1Dk4QDgn/yOetD4l2fy9Vunn5E5xG1MgSVgnj1eHxIahE61SgClc691L/vzNNa5MlHi/KTjHG+q4pFonYDrq4yNFAD+rJJLI7ANnsogEWEDkCHrY8LbV7e8bnjH+UO0k8PTGt+B3HafgcT4T8wv4DhnTUxNYS9rCN4HnxpqhPEulpYCqIA3YtFcyb/Q/j9bIWiDMKIPFuUY/7dlEJi4/3hPf/bZbB9rg60oKx0XnYtkPFCIPdfcZm/EmVdtXJlCrNcMLQ9SwL5LdCEY/T3rp+uxrh5/y62ApLOrCRzlVUog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=q6AuPystZE1AvQyEmrn//yAt5CPxJIvevGBRj4GoOuE=; b=aD5v55Z1ramWQnh/6Crjz9aKoj/N9A2W9RYNxXsC0ZNgeLFu0lhBV0XKENEcaQfnJPysqDa7JsolQsDUcXJzGNqetY2iojVfBu/8kFp0PTrLTMTJtr2WgNuWz92RXYh5zBEf/ZQ51IH3t/E/prV3EwqMEs3RJl0WP8gYtC9/L7/tjrqKq4QHvzhko68uLxVZFPko/o22U004++/IdD2FcEifAjPqMT6d/Gnz5lW8rSR91EwbLuR8OH6twLehJPkcfyrpRFbNIY2uc9kDaSkMC4SihJxHiXbs96sEBjRgjixu4R2RblM31SXO5/tFmyYKthtkUJ9vFCRgT5ZUloMeSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=radcom.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=radcom.com;dkim=pass header.d=radcom.com;arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=radcom.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=q6AuPystZE1AvQyEmrn//yAt5CPxJIvevGBRj4GoOuE=; b=YmW/OOIaIShIZKzKrEGFj43wTjfgoxec7clPybqag3Wv4MAohjhJWaX/MJoO+iNlqQJVyX3MJqiT8br2HQlAeseHL6+L7DpQty334N/VENvYGT+TlrM7C0wA+rfT3/evhWPiAxzkdQtdjs4jiH1WltGCMXJ/JH5YMiGtt61vB54= Received: from DB7PR09MB2378.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.176.239.19) by DB7PR09MB2460.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.176.239.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2115.14; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:41:36 +0000 Received: from DB7PR09MB2378.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::28d9:4e5a:468b:dccb]) by DB7PR09MB2378.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::28d9:4e5a:468b:dccb%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2115.005; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:41:36 +0000 From: Yaron Illouz To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Is mbuf detached from pool? Thread-Index: AdVGAm4UUuKusfsUTJGeIWkNGN/7Ug== Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:41:36 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=yaroni@radcom.com; x-originating-ip: [80.74.109.2] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9168bdf2-0c3c-4964-3326-08d71419b66b x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR09MB2460; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR09MB2460: x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273; x-forefront-prvs: 01136D2D90 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(39840400004)(346002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(5660300002)(6436002)(476003)(7736002)(21615005)(7696005)(55016002)(66066001)(53936002)(26005)(68736007)(81156014)(81166006)(14454004)(74316002)(1730700003)(186003)(5640700003)(2906002)(606006)(6916009)(99286004)(486006)(52536014)(966005)(8676002)(33656002)(102836004)(25786009)(6116002)(790700001)(3846002)(8936002)(478600001)(54896002)(6306002)(2501003)(9686003)(256004)(4744005)(71200400001)(316002)(2351001)(9326002)(86362001)(66476007)(66556008)(6506007)(76116006)(66446008)(236005)(64756008)(66946007)(71190400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR09MB2460; H:DB7PR09MB2378.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:3; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: radcom.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: eA8lwz8kExxyZMJbsTqq5JVaGsQBCsMsLMWTMmvLfKAjMAgDiyM3KnTvJX0svVciiPoYT6H9e28sk0SZ6HDo4iArQghOq1XZTpQ5xSYx2LGtDMnMwlTjBhfeYU7dsGuCMuplWwsvcPOCcJBLXrit0WymoSaH7WyL9HZDtZTsjaO7AnEg1Hy1N6SyL5rF9Zy6b04tOmQrjPS3pODdPaDiGTNmDE6kKuGflQxOUULD59aNdEDsvEgUOWf64Tn/J78TWpt/1H7s45O0rOw/c3Toz4m/v2aTdxM7ecqGpRSSCWgRCl+U6wIa0mNcMZXmPwk9cxBDyZX3g/3lGnHZTlLDy/8V+u6qnRhnyOeRJ0oOJUnjjyef0dox2cviiHeNp0yZKbFtOGQdXOrm9XMPpOJJQ8dZlcDTjH62U2BNLG2jVIM= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: radcom.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9168bdf2-0c3c-4964-3326-08d71419b66b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Jul 2019 11:41:36.2251 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0eb9e2d9-8763-412e-9709-3f539e9e25bc X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yaroni@radcom.com X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR09MB2460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Is mbuf detached from pool? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi I had a check in code for mbuf double release I used to check if the reference count <=3D 0 Since the following change i can't check anymore this way since the referen= ce count is 1 even after it is release to the pool http://mails.dpdk.org/ar= chives/dev/2017-January/056188.html I there a way to check if the mbuf is detached(in the pool or out of the po= ol) instead of looking at ref count?