DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 回复:  回复: [PATCH] app/eventdev: remove unnecessary barrier for order test
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 02:00:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB9PR08MB6923A3004336A8CDAD9EFB0FC82B9@DB9PR08MB6923.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1OXAXrLWug1w16rEXyLNvo4VwMZdfvgTWnZkNm220Gn5w@mail.gmail.com>



> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> 发送时间: 2021年5月18日 22:05
> 收件人: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
> 抄送: jerinj@marvell.com; Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> nd <nd@arm.com>
> 主题: Re: [dpdk-dev] 回复: [PATCH] app/eventdev: remove unnecessary
> barrier for order test
> 
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:57 PM Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Jerin
> >
> > Sorry to disturb you. Would you please help me review this patch, thanks
> very much.
> 
> In slowpath, I thought of having this barrier. But I agree that it can be
> removed.
> Since this is not bug. We will merge this patch in next release.

That's Ok. Thanks very much for your reviewing.

Best Regards
Feifei
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Feifei
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 2:12 PM
> > > To: jerinj@marvell.com
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Feifei Wang
> > > <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> > > Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] app/eventdev: remove unnecessary barrier for order
> > > test
> > >
> > > For "order_launch_lcores" function, wmb after that the main lcore
> > > updates the variable "t->err", which represents the end of the test
> > > signal, is unnecessary. Because after the main lcore updates this
> > > siginal variable, it will jump out of the launch function loop, and
> > > wait other lcores stop or return error in the main function(evt_main.c).
> > > During this time, there is no storing operation and thus no need for wmb.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c | 1 -
> > >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c b/app/test-
> > > eventdev/test_order_common.c index 04456d56db..d7760061ba 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
> > > @@ -308,7 +308,6 @@ order_launch_lcores(struct evt_test *test,
> > > struct evt_options *opt,
> > >                               rte_event_dev_dump(opt->dev_id, stdout);
> > >                               evt_err("No schedules for seconds,
> > > deadlock");
> > >                               t->err = true;
> > > -                             rte_smp_wmb();
> > >                               break;
> > >                       }
> > >                       old_remaining = remaining;
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10  6:11 [dpdk-dev] " Feifei Wang
     [not found] ` <AM5PR0802MB2465F23DEA897DA3CFB06B029E2C9@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
2021-05-18  9:27   ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-05-18 14:05     ` Jerin Jacob
2021-05-19  2:00       ` Feifei Wang [this message]
2021-06-30  6:49 ` [dpdk-dev] " Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DB9PR08MB6923A3004336A8CDAD9EFB0FC82B9@DB9PR08MB6923.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).