From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:26:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB58143C008A6B5471AE2E0F2098230@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200911161002.19816-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com>
<snip>
>
> Add check in test_ring_basic_ex and test_ring_with_exact_size for single
> element enqueue and dequeue operations to validate the dequeued objects.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_ring.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ring.c b/app/test/test_ring.c index
> 0ae97d341..6e48cc0b1 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ring.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ring.c
> @@ -780,15 +780,9 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> int ret = -1;
> unsigned int i, j;
> struct rte_ring *rp = NULL;
> - void *obj = NULL;
> + void **src = NULL, **cur_src = NULL, **dst = NULL, **cur_dst = NULL;
>
> for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(esize); i++) {
> - obj = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> - if (obj == NULL) {
> - printf("%s: failed to alloc memory\n", __func__);
> - goto fail_test;
> - }
> -
> rp = test_ring_create("test_ring_basic_ex", esize[i], RING_SIZE,
> SOCKET_ID_ANY,
> RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
> @@ -797,6 +791,23 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> goto fail_test;
> }
>
> + /* alloc dummy object pointers */
> + src = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> + if (src == NULL) {
> + printf("%s: failed to alloc src memory\n", __func__);
> + goto fail_test;
> + }
> + test_ring_mem_init(src, RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> + cur_src = src;
> +
> + /* alloc some room for copied objects */
> + dst = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> + if (dst == NULL) {
> + printf("%s: failed to alloc dst memory\n", __func__);
> + goto fail_test;
> + }
> + cur_dst = dst;
> +
> if (rte_ring_lookup("test_ring_basic_ex") != rp) {
> printf("%s: failed to find ring\n", __func__);
> goto fail_test;
> @@ -812,8 +823,9 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> rte_ring_free_count(rp));
>
> for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE; j++) {
> - test_ring_enqueue(rp, obj, esize[i], 1,
> + test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> + cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
> }
>
> if (rte_ring_full(rp) != 1) {
> @@ -823,8 +835,9 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> }
>
> for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE; j++) {
> - test_ring_dequeue(rp, obj, esize[i], 1,
> + test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 1,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> + cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 1);
> }
>
> if (rte_ring_empty(rp) != 1) {
> @@ -833,52 +846,80 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
> goto fail_test;
> }
>
> + /* check data */
> + if (memcmp(src, dst, cur_src - src)) {
> + rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src, cur_src - src);
> + rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst, cur_dst - dst);
> + printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
> + goto fail_test;
> + }
> +
> /* Following tests use the configured flags to decide
> * SP/SC or MP/MC.
> */
> + /* reset memory of dst */
> + memset(dst, 0, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
> +
> + /* reset cur_src and cur_dst */
> + cur_src = src;
> + cur_dst = dst;
> +
> /* Covering the ring burst operation */
> - ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> + ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 2,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
> if (ret != 2) {
> printf("%s: rte_ring_enqueue_burst fails\n", __func__);
> goto fail_test;
> }
> + cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
>
> - ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> + ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 2,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
> if (ret != 2) {
> printf("%s: rte_ring_dequeue_burst fails\n", __func__);
> goto fail_test;
> }
> + cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
>
> /* Covering the ring bulk operation */
> - ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> + ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 2,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BULK);
> if (ret != 2) {
> printf("%s: rte_ring_enqueue_bulk fails\n", __func__);
> goto fail_test;
> }
> + cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
>
> - ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> + ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 2,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BULK);
> if (ret != 2) {
> printf("%s: rte_ring_dequeue_bulk fails\n", __func__);
> goto fail_test;
> }
> + cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
> +
> + /* check data */
> + if (memcmp(src, dst, cur_dst - dst)) {
> + rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src, cur_src - src);
> + rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst, cur_dst - dst);
> + printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
> + goto fail_test;
> + }
>
> rte_ring_free(rp);
> - rte_free(obj);
> + rte_free(src);
> + rte_free(dst);
> rp = NULL;
> - obj = NULL;
> + src = NULL;
> + dst = NULL;
> }
>
> return 0;
>
> fail_test:
> rte_ring_free(rp);
> - if (obj != NULL)
> - rte_free(obj);
> -
> + rte_free(src);
> + rte_free(dst);
> return -1;
> }
>
> @@ -889,8 +930,8 @@ static int
> test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> {
> struct rte_ring *std_r = NULL, *exact_sz_r = NULL;
> - void *obj_orig;
> - void *obj;
> + void **src_orig = NULL, **dst_orig = NULL;
> + void **src = NULL, **cur_src = NULL, **dst = NULL, **cur_dst = NULL;
> const unsigned int ring_sz = 16;
> unsigned int i, j;
> int ret = -1;
> @@ -900,14 +941,6 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> TEST_RING_IGNORE_API_TYPE,
> esize[i]);
>
> - /* alloc object pointers. Allocate one extra object
> - * and create an unaligned address.
> - */
> - obj_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> - if (obj_orig == NULL)
> - goto test_fail;
> - obj = ((char *)obj_orig) + 1;
> -
> std_r = test_ring_create("std", esize[i], ring_sz,
> rte_socket_id(),
> RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
> @@ -925,6 +958,22 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> goto test_fail;
> }
>
> + /* alloc object pointers. Allocate one extra object
> + * and create an unaligned address.
> + */
> + src_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> + if (src_orig == NULL)
> + goto test_fail;
> + test_ring_mem_init(src_orig, 17, esize[i]);
> + src = (void **)((uintptr_t)src_orig + 1);
> + cur_src = src;
> +
> + dst_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> + if (dst_orig == NULL)
> + goto test_fail;
> + dst = (void **)((uintptr_t)dst_orig + 1);
> + cur_dst = dst;
> +
> /*
> * Check that the exact size ring is bigger than the
> * standard ring
> @@ -941,33 +990,36 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> * than the standard ring. (16 vs 15 elements)
> */
> for (j = 0; j < ring_sz - 1; j++) {
> - test_ring_enqueue(std_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> + test_ring_enqueue(std_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> - test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> + test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> + cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
> }
> - ret = test_ring_enqueue(std_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> + ret = test_ring_enqueue(std_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> if (ret != -ENOBUFS) {
> printf("%s: error, unexpected successful enqueue\n",
> __func__);
> goto test_fail;
> }
> - ret = test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> + ret = test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> if (ret == -ENOBUFS) {
> printf("%s: error, enqueue failed\n", __func__);
> goto test_fail;
> }
> + cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
>
> /* check that dequeue returns the expected number of
> elements */
> - ret = test_ring_dequeue(exact_sz_r, obj, esize[i], ring_sz,
> + ret = test_ring_dequeue(exact_sz_r, cur_dst, esize[i], ring_sz,
> TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
> if (ret != (int)ring_sz) {
> printf("%s: error, failed to dequeue expected nb of
> elements\n",
> __func__);
> goto test_fail;
> }
> + cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], ring_sz);
>
> /* check that the capacity function returns expected value */
> if (rte_ring_get_capacity(exact_sz_r) != ring_sz) { @@ -976,10
> +1028,20 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> goto test_fail;
> }
>
> - rte_free(obj_orig);
> + /* check data */
> + if (memcmp(src, dst, cur_dst - dst)) {
> + rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src, cur_src - src);
> + rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst, cur_dst - dst);
> + printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
> + goto test_fail;
> + }
> +
> + rte_free(src_orig);
> + rte_free(dst_orig);
> rte_ring_free(std_r);
> rte_ring_free(exact_sz_r);
> - obj_orig = NULL;
> + src_orig = NULL;
> + dst_orig = NULL;
> std_r = NULL;
> exact_sz_r = NULL;
> }
> @@ -987,7 +1049,8 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> return 0;
>
> test_fail:
> - rte_free(obj_orig);
> + rte_free(src_orig);
> + rte_free(dst_orig);
> rte_ring_free(std_r);
> rte_ring_free(exact_sz_r);
> return -1;
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 6:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] wrong pointer passed of ring Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] ring: fix the misdescription of the param Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 15:59 ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 16:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-07-29 19:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:16 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31 5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-29 6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] test/ring: fix wrong param passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 13:48 ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 14:16 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2020-07-29 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 21:24 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31 6:25 ` Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] wrong pointer passed and add check Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27 9:05 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/ring: fix the wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27 8:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05 6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/ring: add check to validate the dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:50 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27 8:47 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:28 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:29 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:31 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 4:37 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-14 9:20 ` David Marchand
2020-09-11 16:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-15 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-17 16:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-20 11:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 15:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-23 9:24 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB58143C008A6B5471AE2E0F2098230@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).