Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce adoption of C11 atomic operations semantics

[Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>]

<snip>

> Subject: [PATCH] doc: announce adoption of C11 atomic operations semantics
> 
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> 
> As agreed in the DPDK tech board [1], after 20.05 release, patches must use
> C11 atomic operations semantics with the help of wrappers.
> 
> [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-April/165143.html
As noted in the minutes, this has been approved in the tech-board. Can I get some ACKs for this patch?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 20aa745..208708d 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -113,3 +113,15 @@ Deprecation Notices
>    Python 2 support will be completely removed in 20.11.
>    In 20.08, explicit deprecation warnings will be displayed when running
>    scripts with Python 2.
> +
> +* rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This
> +does
> +  not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures
> +supported
> +  in DPDK. DPDK will adopt C11 atomic operations semantics and provide
> +wrappers
> +  using C11 atomic built-ins. These wrappers must be used for patches
> +that
> +  need to be merged in 20.08 onwards.
> +
> +* rte_smp_*mb: These APIs provide full barrier functionality. However,
> +many
> +  use cases do not require full barriers. To support such use cases,
> +DPDK will
> +  adopt C11 barrier semantics and provide wrappers using C11 atomic built-
> ins.
> +  These wrappers must be used for patches that need to be merged in
> +20.08
> +  onwards.
> --
> 2.7.4