DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xu, HuilongX" <huilongx.xu@intel.com>
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	"Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] about memzone name size issue
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:34:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DF2A19295B96364286FEB7F3DDA27A4637B574A0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C21A0133C6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi ,
I will tester-by this patch, thanks  a lot.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:59 PM
> To: Wiles, Keith; Xu, HuilongX; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] about memzone name size issue
> 
> Hi Huilong,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:18 PM
> > To: Xu, HuilongX <huilongx.xu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] about memzone name size issue
> >
> > >Hi all,
> > >I find a issue on link_bonding unit test case.
> > >
> > >When I run model6 test case, will generate core dump error.
> > >I debug it, find the error code in function:
> > >rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned
> > elt_size,
> > >                unsigned cache_size, unsigned private_data_size,
> > >                int socket_id, unsigned flags) {
> > >          .......................
> > >                ret = snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name),
> > RTE_MEMPOOL_MZ_FORMAT, name);
> > >                if (ret < 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(mz_name)) {
> > >                                rte_errno = ENAMETOOLONG;
> > >                                goto exit_unlock;
> > >                }
> > >           .........................
> > >}
> > >The memzone name size only 32 bytes, but the mz_name in link_bonding
> is
> > bigger 32 bytes. Could we set memzone name size to 64 bytes ?
> > >Thanks  a lot
> >
> > Having a name of 32 bytes is pretty big IMO, what would be a better
> reason
> > for changing a internal structure as it will take two releases to make
> that
> > change?
> > How big is the name string you are passing into the routine?
> > >
> >
> >
> The following patches were submitted last Friday to fix this issue with
> the link bonding tests.
> 
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/13052/
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/13053/
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bernard.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 13:17 Wiles, Keith
2016-05-31 13:58 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2016-06-01  0:34   ` Xu, HuilongX [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-31  9:07 Xu, HuilongX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DF2A19295B96364286FEB7F3DDA27A4637B574A0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=huilongx.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).