DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "ktraynor@redhat.com" <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"mkp@redhat.com" <mkp@redhat.com>,
	"dexia.li@jaguarmicro.com" <dexia.li@jaguarmicro.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	Kevin Liu <kevinx.liu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] net/ice: fix TSO with big segments
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 05:48:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB5994057B93708BD9560B53EED7F8A@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919140430.3251493-2-david.marchand@redhat.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 10:05 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: ktraynor@redhat.com; mkp@redhat.com; dexia.li@jaguarmicro.com;
> stable@dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Kevin Liu <kevinx.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] net/ice: fix TSO with big segments
> 
> Packets to be segmented with TSO are usually larger than MTU.
> Plus, a single segment for the whole packet may be used: in OVS case, an
> external rte_malloc'd buffer is used for packets received from vhost-user
> ports.
> 
> Before this fix, TSO packets were dropped by net/ice with the following
> message:
> 2023-09-18T13:34:31.064Z|00020|dpdk(pmd-
> c31/id:22)|ERR|ice_prep_pkts():
> 	INVALID mbuf: bad data_len=[2962]
> 
> Remove the check on data_len.
> 
> Besides, logging an error level message in a datapath function may slow
> down the whole application. It is better not to log anything.
> 
> Fixes: ccf33dccf7aa ("net/ice: check illegal packet sizes")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> Note: there may be some followup patch later, as some additional check has
> been added in ice_prep_pkts.
> For context, see:
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CAJFAV8yOa3ShkVdEXHfnmOEmUTwV3e75Bu9U3
> OqpNc5usTt3Rw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
> 
> ---
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c index
> 64c4486b4b..80c4284200 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> @@ -3685,9 +3685,6 @@ ice_prep_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue,
> struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
>  	int i, ret;
>  	uint64_t ol_flags;
>  	struct rte_mbuf *m;
> -	struct ice_tx_queue *txq = tx_queue;
> -	struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[txq->port_id];
> -	uint16_t max_frame_size = dev->data->mtu + ICE_ETH_OVERHEAD;
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
>  		m = tx_pkts[i];
> @@ -3704,11 +3701,8 @@ ice_prep_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue,
> struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
>  			return i;
>  		}
> 
> -		/* check the data_len in mbuf */
> -		if (m->data_len < ICE_TX_MIN_PKT_LEN ||
> -			m->data_len > max_frame_size) {
> +		if (m->pkt_len < ICE_TX_MIN_PKT_LEN) {

+1 

>  			rte_errno = EINVAL;
> -			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "INVALID mbuf: bad
> data_len=[%hu]", m->data_len);

is it still worth to keep a debug level log here ? and it's better to unify the logging method in the same function.

>  			return i;
>  		}
> 
> --
> 2.41.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-21  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-19 14:04 [PATCH 1/2] net/iavf: " David Marchand
2023-09-19 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/ice: " David Marchand
2023-09-21  5:48   ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2023-09-21  5:55     ` David Marchand
2023-09-21 10:42       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-09-25 10:30         ` David Marchand
2023-09-27  4:05           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-09-27  9:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] net/iavf: remove log from Tx prepare datapath function David Marchand
2023-09-27  9:41   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net/iavf: fix TSO with big segments David Marchand
2023-09-27  9:41   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] net/ice: remove log from Tx prepare datapath function David Marchand
2023-09-27  9:41   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] net/ice: fix TSO with big segments David Marchand
2023-09-27 12:36     ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM4PR11MB5994057B93708BD9560B53EED7F8A@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dexia.li@jaguarmicro.com \
    --cc=kevinx.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkp@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).