DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>,
	"Daly, Jeff" <jeffd@silicom-usa.com>,
	"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Wenjun1" <wenjun1.wu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Treat 1G Cu SFPs as 1G SX on the X550 devices
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 00:14:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB59948E4C6A31E444D3C2E5EFD7D39@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1681763.yIU609i1g2@thomas>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 10:21 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>; Jeff Daly <jeffd@silicom-
> usa.com>; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Wu, Wenjun1 <wenjun1.wu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Treat 1G Cu SFPs as 1G SX on the X550 devices
> 
> Please, could we have a review of this patch?
> +Cc new ixgbe maintainers
> 
> 
> 07/03/2022 23:34, jeffd@silicom-usa.com:
> > From: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> >
> > 1G Cu SFPs are not officially supported on the X552/X553 family of
> > devices but treat them as 1G SX modules since they usually work.
> > Print a warning though since support isn't validated, similar to what
> > already happens for other unofficially supported SFPs enabled via the
> > allow_unsupported_sfps parameter inherited from the mainline Linux driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Daly <jeffd@silicom-usa.com>

I think we need a devargs for this feature with well documentation
So, it should not break existing behavior by default, but allow people to take risk if they know what they are doing.

Thanks
Qi


> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c
> > index 8810d1658e..8d1bc6c80d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_x550.c
> > @@ -1538,9 +1538,21 @@ STATIC s32
> ixgbe_supported_sfp_modules_X550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, bool *linear)
> >  	case ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_lha_core1:
> >  		*linear = false;
> >  		break;
> > -	case ixgbe_sfp_type_unknown:
> > +	/* Copper SFPs are not officially supported for x550em devices, but can
> > +	 * often be made to work at fixed 1G speeds.  Pretend they're 1g_sx
> > +	 * modules here to allow g.Fast DSL SFPs to work.
> > +	 */
> >  	case ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_cu_core0:
> > +		EWARN(hw, "Pretending that unsupported 1g_cu SFP is
> 1g_sx\n");
> > +		*linear = false;
> > +		hw->phy.sfp_type = ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core0;
> > +		break;
> >  	case ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_cu_core1:
> > +		EWARN(hw, "Pretending that unsupported 1g_cu SFP is
> 1g_sx\n");
> > +		*linear = false;
> > +		hw->phy.sfp_type = ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_sx_core1;
> > +		break;
> > +	case ixgbe_sfp_type_unknown:
> >  	default:
> >  		return IXGBE_ERR_SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> >  	}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07 22:34 jeffd
2022-04-13 14:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-20  0:14   ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2022-05-20 18:02     ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-23  5:36       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-23 14:13         ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-23 23:22           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-25 15:23             ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-26  0:28               ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-04-14  1:31 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-04-14  9:42   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-14 12:13     ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-04-14 12:18       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-14 15:11         ` Jeff Daly
2022-04-14 15:43           ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-04-14 17:06             ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19  9:11               ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-19 12:32                 ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-04-15  1:10           ` Wang, Haiyue
2022-05-26 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff Daly
2022-05-29 22:49   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-30 13:32     ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-30 13:50       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-05-31 12:30         ` Jeff Daly
2022-05-31 13:38           ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM4PR11MB59948E4C6A31E444D3C2E5EFD7D39@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jeffd@silicom-usa.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=stephend@silicom-usa.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wenjun1.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).