From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] common/mlx5: add provider query port support to glue library
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:07:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR12MB50542FE7FE30F556099179D6CF199@DM4PR12MB5054.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210707155428.13178-1-viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 6:54 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad
> <matan@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; david.marchand@redhat.com; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] common/mlx5: add provider query port support to
> glue library
>
> In order to get E-Switch vport identifiers the mlx5 PMD relies
> on two approaches:
> [a] use port query API if it is provided by rdma-core library
> [b] otherwise, deduce vport ids from the related VF index
> The latter is not reliable and may not work with newer kernel
> drivers and in some configurations (LAG), causing E-Switch
> malfunction. Hence, engaging the port query API is highly
> desirable.
>
> Depending on rdma-core version the port query API is:
> - very old OFED versions have no query API (approach [b])
> - rdma-core OFED < 5.5 provides mlx5dv_query_devx_port,
> HAVE_MLX5DV_DR_DEVX_PORT flag is defined (approach [a])
> - rdma-core OFED >= 5.5 has mlx5dv_query_port, flag
> HAVE_MLX5DV_DR_DEVX_PORT_V35 is defined (approach [a])
> - future OFED versions might remove mlx5dv_query_devx_port
> and HAVE_MLX5DV_DR_DEVX_PORT will not be defined
> - Upstream rdma-core < v35 has no port query API (approach [b])
> - Upstream rdma-core >= v35 has mlx5dv_query_port, flag
> HAVE_MLX5DV_DR_DEVX_PORT_V35 is defined (approach [a])
>
> In order to support the new mlx5dv_query_port routine, the
> conditional compilation flag HAVE_MLX5DV_DR_DEVX_PORT_V35
> is introduced by the this patch. The flag HAVE_MLX5DV_DR_DEVX_PORT
> is kept for compatibility with previous rdma-core versions.
>
> Despite this patch is not a bugfix (it follows the introduced API
> variation in underlying library), it resolves the compatibility
> issue and is highly desired to be ported to DPDK LTS.
>
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Replaced older version and pushed to next-net-mlx,
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-19 12:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-06-20 8:25 ` Raslan Darawsheh
2021-06-23 10:42 ` David Marchand
2021-06-23 11:27 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-06-23 13:51 ` David Marchand
2021-06-23 15:39 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-06-24 10:10 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-01 7:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-07-01 7:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] common/mlx5: fix compilation flag on port query API Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-07-06 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-06 13:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] common/mlx5: add provider query port support to glue library Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-07 15:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-07-07 15:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] common/mlx5: fix compilation flag on port query API Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-07-07 17:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-07 17:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] common/mlx5: add provider query port support to glue library Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-08 16:07 ` Raslan Darawsheh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM4PR12MB50542FE7FE30F556099179D6CF199@DM4PR12MB5054.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).