From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: "shaikh@niometrics.com" <shaikh@niometrics.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] net/i40e: fix compilation failure on core-avx-i
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 01:06:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM5PR11MB178726C45B38C36EF28701028C139@DM5PR11MB1787.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Hi Shahed,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shahed Shaikh <shaikh@niometrics.com<mailto:shaikh@niometrics.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 5:37 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com<mailto:beilei.xing@intel.com>>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Shahed Shaikh <shaikh@niometrics.com<mailto:shaikh@niometrics.com>>;
> stable@dpdk.org<mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net/i40e: fix compilation failure on core-avx-i
>
> i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c fails to compile with below configuration:
> - #define RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_16BYTE_RX_DESC 1 in config/rte_config.h
> - cpu=core-axv-i
> - gcc which supports -mavx2 (e.g. gcc 4.8.5)
>
> This is because commit 0604b1f2208f ("net/i40e: fix crash in AVX512")
> added
> i40e_rxq_rearm_common() to i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h which is included by
> i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c.
>
> This function is enabled for compilation if CC_AVX2_SUPPORT is defined.
> As per drivers/net/i40e/meson.build, CC_AVX2_SUPPORT is defined when
> either CPU supports __AVX2__ or compiler supports -mavx2 option.
>
> So for given configuration, CC_AVX2_SUPPORT gets defined but we don't
> pass -mavx2 explicitly to gcc while compiling i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c.
Looks like it's better and more clear if a new specific avx head file is added.
Just want to understand more about the problem. I don't see the same problem when using 'gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) (GCC)', don't understand why -mavx2 is missing.
And more, if so, why the avx2 code doesn't meet the same problem?
Thanks.
> Hence it fails due to avx2 specific code from i40e_rxq_rearm_command().
>
> This patch tries to fix the compilation by moving
> i40e_rxq_rearm_common() to a new header file which will only be
> included by i40e_rxtx_vec_avx2.c and i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c.
>
> Fixes: 0604b1f2208f ("net/i40e: fix crash in AVX512")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org<mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Shahed Shaikh <shaikh@niometrics.com<mailto:shaikh@niometrics.com>>
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 1:06 Lu, Wenzhuo [this message]
2021-08-02 0:17 ` Zhang, Qi Z
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-22 9:37 Shahed Shaikh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM5PR11MB178726C45B38C36EF28701028C139@DM5PR11MB1787.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shaikh@niometrics.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).