From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/crypto: change cipher offset for esn vector
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:07:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM5PR1801MB18845F0E040C5C4A2898BBCADD660@DM5PR1801MB1884.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB3168E886C7274EB964633CD2E6690@VI1PR04MB3168.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Akhil,
Please see my reply inline.
Thanks
Ankur
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 12:24 AM
>To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com; Hemant Agrawal
><hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>; Anoob
>Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
>Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH] test/crypto: change cipher offset for esn vector
>
>External Email
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Why do we need this change?
>> >The existing test case is to demonstrate a generic case where we can
>> >have an auth only trailer as well. It is similar to a case of IPSEC
>> >ESN but not exactly IPSec. Cipher offset can be anything as per the app
>requirement.
>> >I don't think there is anything wrong in the vector. It should pass
>> >in every hardware without any issue.
>> [Ankur] It's a limitation in OCTEON TX PMDs that the (encr offset -
>> auth offset) should be 8 bytes aligned.
>> In the IPSEC ESN scenario generally the offsets will be such.
>> But in the above IPSEC ESN test vector, this requirement is not met
>> and hence the associated test cases fails on the PMD.
>
>In that case, I think it is better to have a separate test vector and both should
>be executed. With the previous one as not supported in your case and this
>one will be supported.
[Ankur] The offsets values are present per crypto operation. So to make these tests
as unsupported the pmd datapath needs to be changed.
Is there an alternative to make these tests unsupported?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-05 8:30 Ankur Dwivedi
2020-06-30 14:15 ` Ankur Dwivedi
2020-07-06 12:23 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-06 15:03 ` Ankur Dwivedi
2020-07-06 18:54 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-07 6:07 ` Ankur Dwivedi [this message]
2020-07-07 19:20 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-07-08 9:51 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-07-14 7:52 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-07-15 19:54 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM5PR1801MB18845F0E040C5C4A2898BBCADD660@DM5PR1801MB1884.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=vakul.garg@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).