* [dpdk-dev] udp checksum
@ 2019-09-24 15:11 Khoussi, Siham (IntlAssoc)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khoussi, Siham (IntlAssoc) @ 2019-09-24 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Dear all,
I have a question related to layer 4 checksum. I am creating a UDP packet by appending the layers in order (udp, ipv4, Eth). However, when I run Wireshark on the receiving end I get: [UDPchecksum = missing (nor present]. Whereas, the checksum for ipv4 works fine.
Here is what I do:
.... Filling udp header
.....
Struct udp_hdr *udp=(struct udp_hdr*)rte_pktmbuf_prepend(mbuf, sizeof(*udp));
Udp->dgram_cksum=0;
Ipv4->hdr->hdr_cksum=0;
Udp->dgram_cksum= rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum((const struct ipv4_hdr *)ipv4_hdr, (const void *)udp);
Ipv4_hdr->hdr_cksum= rte_ipv4_cksum((const struct ipv4_hdr *)ipv4_hdr);
--- continue filling ipv4 fields
...
Does anyone have an idea why rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum() not working?
Thank you,
Siham
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213A2EC5@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
@ 2014-11-06 17:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2014-11-06 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Markuze (alex@weka.io); +Cc: dev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 5:04 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Subject: FW: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
>
>
>
> From: Alex Markuze [mailto:alex@weka.io]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:27 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
>
> I was setting both ip and udp scum fields to 0. PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM == PKT_TX_L4_MASK = 0x6000.
>
> I was not aware of the get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr);
> And I'm quite frankly surprised the HW doesn't already do this. Farther more I don't remember kernel drivers messing with
> L3 Headers(bnx2x/mlx4). Is this true for all PMDs that do scum offloads?
I suppose it depends on HW implementation.
All Intel NICs I am aware about (e1000, ixgbe, i40e) expect that SW provides the pseudo IP header checksum in the L4 header.
Not sure what is the story with NICs from other manufactures.
>
> I will give it a try now.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alex Markuze
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:05 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm seeing "UDP: bad checksum." messages(dmesg) for packets sent by my dpdk
> > app to a socket on a remote machine.
> > Looking at the packets the scum value is set, its just not what wireshark
> > expects.
> >
> > When sending I'm setting these fields in the egress packets.
> >
> > pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
> >
> > pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
> >
> > pkt->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK);
> > //PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK;
> >
> >
> > I'm working with a 82599 VF.
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts? I'm not sure what else to check.
> As I remember, you have to setup IPV4 header checksum to 0 and
> calculate and setup pseudo-header checksum for UDP.
> From app/test-pmd/csumonly.c:
> ...
> if (pkt_ol_flags & (PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR | PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR)) {
>
> /* Do not support ipv4 option field */
> l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr) ;
>
> ...
>
> /* Do not delete, this is required by HW*/
> ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
>
> ...
>
> if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_UDP) {
> udp_hdr = (struct udp_hdr*) (rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb,
> unsigned char *) + l2_len + l3_len);
> if (tx_ol_flags & 0x2) {
> /* HW Offload */
> ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM;
> if (ipv4_tunnel)
> udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = 0;
> else
> /* Pseudo header sum need be set properly */
> udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
> get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr);
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2014-11-06 16:26 ` Alex Markuze
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213A2EC5@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Markuze @ 2014-11-06 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin; +Cc: dev
I was setting both ip and udp scum fields to 0. PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM ==
PKT_TX_L4_MASK = 0x6000.
I was not aware of the get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr);
And I'm quite frankly surprised the HW doesn't already do this. Farther
more I don't remember kernel drivers messing with
L3 Headers(bnx2x/mlx4). Is this true for all PMDs that do scum offloads?
I will give it a try now.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin <
konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alex Markuze
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:05 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm seeing "UDP: bad checksum." messages(dmesg) for packets sent by my
> dpdk
> > app to a socket on a remote machine.
> > Looking at the packets the scum value is set, its just not what wireshark
> > expects.
> >
> > When sending I'm setting these fields in the egress packets.
> >
> > pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
> >
> > pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
> >
> > pkt->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK);
> > //PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK;
> >
> >
> > I'm working with a 82599 VF.
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts? I'm not sure what else to check.
>
> As I remember, you have to setup IPV4 header checksum to 0 and
> calculate and setup pseudo-header checksum for UDP.
> From app/test-pmd/csumonly.c:
> ...
> if (pkt_ol_flags & (PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR | PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR)) {
>
> /* Do not support ipv4 option field */
> l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr) ;
>
> ...
>
> /* Do not delete, this is required by HW*/
> ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
>
> ...
>
> if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_UDP) {
> udp_hdr = (struct udp_hdr*)
> (rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb,
> unsigned char *) + l2_len
> + l3_len);
> if (tx_ol_flags & 0x2) {
> /* HW Offload */
> ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM;
> if (ipv4_tunnel)
> udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = 0;
> else
> /* Pseudo header sum need
> be set properly */
> udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
>
> get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr);
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
2014-11-06 16:05 [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum Alex Markuze
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Olivier MATZ
@ 2014-11-06 16:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-06 16:26 ` Alex Markuze
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2014-11-06 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Markuze, dev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alex Markuze
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:05 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
>
> Hi,
> I'm seeing "UDP: bad checksum." messages(dmesg) for packets sent by my dpdk
> app to a socket on a remote machine.
> Looking at the packets the scum value is set, its just not what wireshark
> expects.
>
> When sending I'm setting these fields in the egress packets.
>
> pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
>
> pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
>
> pkt->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK);
> //PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK;
>
>
> I'm working with a 82599 VF.
>
>
> Any thoughts? I'm not sure what else to check.
As I remember, you have to setup IPV4 header checksum to 0 and
calculate and setup pseudo-header checksum for UDP.
From app/test-pmd/csumonly.c:
...
if (pkt_ol_flags & (PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR | PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR)) {
/* Do not support ipv4 option field */
l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr) ;
...
/* Do not delete, this is required by HW*/
ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
...
if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_UDP) {
udp_hdr = (struct udp_hdr*) (rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb,
unsigned char *) + l2_len + l3_len);
if (tx_ol_flags & 0x2) {
/* HW Offload */
ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM;
if (ipv4_tunnel)
udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = 0;
else
/* Pseudo header sum need be set properly */
udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
2014-11-06 16:05 [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum Alex Markuze
@ 2014-11-06 16:15 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Olivier MATZ @ 2014-11-06 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Markuze, dev
Hello,
On 11/06/2014 05:05 PM, Alex Markuze wrote:
> I'm seeing "UDP: bad checksum." messages(dmesg) for packets sent by my dpdk
> app to a socket on a remote machine.
> Looking at the packets the scum value is set, its just not what wireshark
> expects.
>
> When sending I'm setting these fields in the egress packets.
>
> pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
>
> pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
>
> pkt->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK);
> //PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK;
I think you need to do:
pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
pkt->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM);
ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = 0;
udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr); /* see csumonly.c */
Regards,
Olivier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
@ 2014-11-06 16:05 Alex Markuze
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Markuze @ 2014-11-06 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi,
I'm seeing "UDP: bad checksum." messages(dmesg) for packets sent by my dpdk
app to a socket on a remote machine.
Looking at the packets the scum value is set, its just not what wireshark
expects.
When sending I'm setting these fields in the egress packets.
pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
pkt->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK);
//PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK;
I'm working with a 82599 VF.
Any thoughts? I'm not sure what else to check.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-24 15:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-24 15:11 [dpdk-dev] udp checksum Khoussi, Siham (IntlAssoc)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-06 16:05 [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum Alex Markuze
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-06 16:26 ` Alex Markuze
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213A2EC5@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
2014-11-06 17:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).