From: "Vargas, Hernan" <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
To: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"gakhil@marvell.com" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
"trix@redhat.com" <trix@redhat.com>,
"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Kinsella, Ray" <ray.kinsella@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 5/6] baseband/acc100: modify validation code for ACC101
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 20:23:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB3660F959AE4CC0650696EF4EEFA19@DM6PR11MB3660.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1654036307-182860-6-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 5:32 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org; gakhil@marvell.com; trix@redhat.com; maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Kinsella, Ray <ray.kinsella@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; david.marchand@redhat.com; Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 5/6] baseband/acc100: modify validation code for ACC101
The validation requirement is different for the two devices.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
---
drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Thanks,
Hernan
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 31046b5..956bd43 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1295,6 +1295,21 @@
RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_HALF_ITERATION_EVEN);
}
+#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
+
+static inline bool
+is_acc100(struct acc100_queue *q)
+{
+ return (q->d->device_variant == ACC100_VARIANT); }
+
+static inline bool
+validate_op_required(struct acc100_queue *q) {
+ return is_acc100(q);
+}
+#endif
+
/* Fill in a frame control word for LDPC decoding. */ static inline void acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc100_fcw_ld *fcw, @@ -2182,13 +2197,16 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset) #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validates turbo encoder parameters */ static inline int -validate_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op)
+validate_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc100_queue *q)
{
struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_enc *turbo_enc = &op->turbo_enc;
struct rte_bbdev_op_enc_turbo_cb_params *cb = NULL;
struct rte_bbdev_op_enc_turbo_tb_params *tb = NULL;
uint16_t kw, kw_neg, kw_pos;
+ if (!validate_op_required(q))
+ return 0;
+
if (op->mempool == NULL) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid mempool pointer");
return -1;
@@ -2320,10 +2338,13 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset) }
/* Validates LDPC encoder parameters */ static inline int -validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op)
+validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc100_queue
+*q)
{
struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_enc *ldpc_enc = &op->ldpc_enc;
+ if (!validate_op_required(q))
+ return 0;
+
if (op->mempool == NULL) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid mempool pointer");
return -1;
@@ -2373,10 +2394,13 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
/* Validates LDPC decoder parameters */ static inline int -validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op)
+validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc100_queue
+*q)
{
struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ldpc_dec = &op->ldpc_dec;
+ if (!validate_op_required(q))
+ return 0;
+
if (op->mempool == NULL) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid mempool pointer");
return -1;
@@ -2429,7 +2453,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_enc_op(op) == -1) {
+ if (validate_enc_op(op, q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo encoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -2483,7 +2507,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(ops[0]) == -1) {
+ if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(ops[0], q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC encoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -2545,7 +2569,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(op) == -1) {
+ if (validate_ldpc_enc_op(op, q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC encoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -2602,7 +2626,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_enc_op(op) == -1) {
+ if (validate_enc_op(op, q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo encoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -2675,12 +2699,15 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset) #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validates turbo decoder parameters */ static inline int -validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op)
+validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc100_queue *q)
{
struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *turbo_dec = &op->turbo_dec;
struct rte_bbdev_op_dec_turbo_cb_params *cb = NULL;
struct rte_bbdev_op_dec_turbo_tb_params *tb = NULL;
+ if (!validate_op_required(q))
+ return 0;
+
if (op->mempool == NULL) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid mempool pointer");
return -1;
@@ -2822,7 +2849,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+ if (validate_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo decoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -3047,7 +3074,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+ if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC decoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -3151,7 +3178,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+ if (validate_ldpc_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "LDPC decoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -3241,7 +3268,7 @@ static inline uint32_t hq_index(uint32_t offset)
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
/* Validate op structure */
- if (validate_dec_op(op) == -1) {
+ if (validate_dec_op(op, q) == -1) {
rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Turbo decoder validation failed");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-03 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 18:16 [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC101 device Nicolas Chautru
2022-04-27 18:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:02 ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:23 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-10 8:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-10 11:55 ` Tom Rix
2022-05-23 17:53 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:07 ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:27 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:38 ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:36 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-10 12:02 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] baseband/acc100: start explicitly PF Monitor from PMD Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:44 ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 22:07 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-04-27 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-08 13:55 ` Tom Rix
2022-05-09 21:45 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-10 12:11 ` Tom Rix
2022-05-10 14:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-16 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC101 device Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-16 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-19 19:55 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-16 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-16 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-19 20:13 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-23 17:06 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-16 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-19 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC101 device Tom Rix
2022-05-23 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-23 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24 0:08 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24 0:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24 0:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24 0:08 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-24 0:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-25 14:33 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-25 22:15 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-31 7:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 18:19 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-24 0:08 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-25 13:24 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-25 22:09 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-26 0:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26 0:55 ` Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-26 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-30 7:40 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-31 18:59 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-26 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-31 8:02 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 18:16 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-26 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-31 7:35 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 18:28 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-05-31 22:31 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Nicolas Chautru
2022-05-31 22:31 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] baseband/acc100: update companion PF configure function Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02 9:49 ` Kevin Traynor
2022-06-02 16:52 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-03 20:25 ` Vargas, Hernan
2022-05-31 22:31 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] baseband/acc100: add protection for some negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02 8:21 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 22:31 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] baseband/acc100: remove RTE prefix for internal macro Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-01 14:11 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-06-01 17:15 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-06-02 12:57 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 22:31 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] baseband/acc100: introduce PMD for ACC101 Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02 12:23 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-05-31 22:31 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] baseband/acc100: modify validation code " Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-03 20:23 ` Vargas, Hernan [this message]
2022-05-31 22:31 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] baseband/acc100: configuration of ACC101 from PF Nicolas Chautru
2022-06-02 8:33 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-06-06 14:54 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] drivers/baseband: PMD to support ACC100/ACC101 devices Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-06 15:03 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-06-06 16:18 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-06-15 14:08 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-06-22 11:50 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB3660F959AE4CC0650696EF4EEFA19@DM6PR11MB3660.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).