From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Archana Muniganti <marchana@marvell.com>,
"gakhil@marvell.com" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
"Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: "anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"ktejasree@marvell.com" <ktejasree@marvell.com>,
"adwivedi@marvell.com" <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] security: add SA config option for inner pkt csum
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:56:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB44914E9C8ACDF63A638263DE9AA99@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929090811.21030-2-marchana@marvell.com>
> Add inner packet IPv4 hdr and L4 checksum enable options
> in conf. These will be used in case of protocol offload.
> Per SA, application could specify whether the
> checksum(compute/verify) can be offloaded to security device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Archana Muniganti <marchana@marvell.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini | 1 +
> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 4 ++--
> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst | 4 ++++
> lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 ++
> lib/security/rte_security.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini b/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini
> index c24814de98..96d95ddc81 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini
> +++ b/doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ Non-Byte aligned data =
> Sym raw data path API =
> Cipher multiple data units =
> Cipher wrapped key =
> +Inner checksum =
>
> ;
> ; Supported crypto algorithms of a default crypto driver.
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 05fc2fdee7..8308e00ed4 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -232,8 +232,8 @@ Deprecation Notices
> IPsec payload MSS (Maximum Segment Size), and ESN (Extended Sequence Number).
>
> * security: The IPsec SA config options ``struct rte_security_ipsec_sa_options``
> - will be updated with new fields to support new features like IPsec inner
> - checksum, TSO in case of protocol offload.
> + will be updated with new fields to support new features like TSO in case of
> + protocol offload.
>
> * ipsec: The structure ``rte_ipsec_sa_prm`` will be extended with a new field
> ``hdr_l3_len`` to configure tunnel L3 header length.
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
> index 8da851cccc..93d1b36889 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
> @@ -194,6 +194,10 @@ ABI Changes
> ``rte_security_ipsec_xform`` to allow applications to configure SA soft
> and hard expiry limits. Limits can be either in number of packets or bytes.
>
> +* security: The new options ``ip_csum_enable`` and ``l4_csum_enable`` were added
> + in structure ``rte_security_ipsec_sa_options`` to indicate whether inner
> + packet IPv4 header checksum and L4 checksum need to be offloaded to
> + security device.
>
> Known Issues
> ------------
> diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> index bb01f0f195..d9271a6c45 100644
> --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> @@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_enum(enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type *xform_enum,
> /**< Support operations on multiple data-units message */
> #define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CIPHER_WRAPPED_KEY (1ULL << 26)
> /**< Support wrapped key in cipher xform */
> +#define RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY_INNER_CSUM (1ULL << 27)
> +/**< Support inner checksum computation/verification */
>
> /**
> * Get the name of a crypto device feature flag
> diff --git a/lib/security/rte_security.h b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> index ab1a6e1f65..945f45ad76 100644
> --- a/lib/security/rte_security.h
> +++ b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,24 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_sa_options {
> * * 0: Do not match UDP ports
> */
> uint32_t udp_ports_verify : 1;
> +
> + /** Compute/verify inner packet IPv4 header checksum in tunnel mode
> + *
> + * * 1: For outbound, compute inner packet IPv4 header checksum
> + * before tunnel encapsulation and for inbound, verify after
> + * tunnel decapsulation.
> + * * 0: Inner packet IP header checksum is not computed/verified.
> + */
> + uint32_t ip_csum_enable : 1;
> +
> + /** Compute/verify inner packet L4 checksum in tunnel mode
> + *
> + * * 1: For outbound, compute inner packet L4 checksum before
> + * tunnel encapsulation and for inbound, verify after
> + * tunnel decapsulation.
> + * * 0: Inner packet L4 checksum is not computed/verified.
> + */
> + uint32_t l4_csum_enable : 1;
As I understand these 2 new flags serve two purposes:
1. report HW/PMD ability to perform these offloads.
2. allow user to enable/disable this offload on SA basis.
One question I have - how it will work on data-path?
Would decision to perform these offloads be based on mbuf->ol_flags value
(same as we doing for ethdev TX offloads)?
Or some other approach is implied?
> };
>
> /** IPSec security association direction */
> --
> 2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 9:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Archana Muniganti
2021-09-29 9:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] security: " Archana Muniganti
2021-09-29 10:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2021-09-29 11:03 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-09-29 11:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-30 5:05 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-09-30 9:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-09-29 9:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto/cnxk: add inner checksum Archana Muniganti
2021-09-29 9:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] test/crypto: add inner checksum cases Archana Muniganti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB44914E9C8ACDF63A638263DE9AA99@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=ktejasree@marvell.com \
--cc=marchana@marvell.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).