DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: huichao cai <chcchc88@163.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ip_frag: fix the buf of fragmenting IPv4 fragment
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:24:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB44918954339FED5FF35EF72B9A869@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1635148553-50086-1-git-send-email-chcchc88@163.com>



> Bugzilla ID: 835
> Fixes: 567473433b7e ("ip_frag: fix fragmenting IPv4 fragment")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: huichao cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> ---
>  lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> index fead5a9..2e7739d 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline void __free_fragments(struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num)
>  	uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
>  	uint32_t more_in_segs;
>  	uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
> -	uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining, not_last_frag;
> +	uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Formal parameter checking.
> @@ -116,9 +116,7 @@ static inline void __free_fragments(struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num)
>  	in_seg = pkt_in;
>  	in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
>  	out_pkt_pos = 0;
> -	fragment_offset = (uint16_t)((flag_offset &
> -	    RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) << RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT);
> -	not_last_frag = (uint16_t)(flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_MF_MASK);
> +	fragment_offset = 0;
> 
>  	more_in_segs = 1;
>  	while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
> @@ -188,8 +186,7 @@ static inline void __free_fragments(struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num)
> 
>  		__fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
>  		    (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
> -		    flag_offset, fragment_offset,
> -		    not_last_frag || more_in_segs);
> +		    flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
> 
>  		fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
>  		    out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
> --
> 1.8.3.1

Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-28 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25  7:55 huichao cai
2021-10-28 12:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2021-11-08 22:54   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB44918954339FED5FF35EF72B9A869@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=chcchc88@163.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).