From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
"shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com" <shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com>,
"ed.czeck@atomicrules.com" <ed.czeck@atomicrules.com>,
"john.miller@atomicrules.com" <john.miller@atomicrules.com>,
Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>,
"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
"somnath.kotur@broadcom.com" <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>,
"rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com" <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com" <sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com>,
"Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
"Daley, John" <johndale@cisco.com>,
"hyonkim@cisco.com" <hyonkim@cisco.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"humin29@huawei.com" <humin29@huawei.com>,
"yisen.zhuang@huawei.com" <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
"oulijun@huawei.com" <oulijun@huawei.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
"viacheslavo@nvidia.com" <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
"sthemmin@microsoft.com" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"longli@microsoft.com" <longli@microsoft.com>,
"heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com" <heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com>,
Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"Maciej Czekaj [C]" <mczekaj@marvell.com>,
"jiawenwu@trustnetic.com" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>,
"jianwang@trustnetic.com" <jianwang@trustnetic.com>,
"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
"Jayatheerthan, Jay" <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] ethdev: copy ethdev 'fast' API into separate structure
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:58:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4491AF0A3D321806CBE791169AAD9@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR18MB4086ECC8BB1E17C216E44E05DEAC9@PH0PR18MB4086.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
> >Copy public function pointers (rx_pkt_burst(), etc.) and related
> >pointers to internal data from rte_eth_dev structure into a
> >separate flat array. That array will remain in a public header.
> >The intention here is to make rte_eth_dev and related structures
> >internal.
> >That should allow future possible changes to core eth_dev structures
> >to be transparent to the user and help to avoid ABI/API breakages.
> >The plan is to keep minimal part of data from rte_eth_dev public,
> >so we still can use inline functions for 'fast' calls
> >(like rte_eth_rx_burst(), etc.) to avoid/minimize slowdown.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> >---
> > lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.c | 52
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.h | 7 +++++
> > lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 17 ++++++++++++
> > lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h | 45
> >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> >+void
> >+eth_dev_fp_ops_reset(struct rte_eth_fp_ops *fpo)
> >+{
> >+ static void *dummy_data[RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT];
> >+ static const struct rte_eth_fp_ops dummy_ops = {
> >+ .rx_pkt_burst = dummy_eth_rx_burst,
> >+ .tx_pkt_burst = dummy_eth_tx_burst,
> >+ .rxq = {.data = dummy_data, .clbk = dummy_data,},
> >+ .txq = {.data = dummy_data, .clbk = dummy_data,},
> >+ };
> >+
> >+ *fpo = dummy_ops;
> >+}
> >+
> >+void
> >+eth_dev_fp_ops_setup(struct rte_eth_fp_ops *fpo,
> >+ const struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >+{
> >+ fpo->rx_pkt_burst = dev->rx_pkt_burst;
> >+ fpo->tx_pkt_burst = dev->tx_pkt_burst;
> >+ fpo->tx_pkt_prepare = dev->tx_pkt_prepare;
> >+ fpo->rx_queue_count = dev->rx_queue_count;
> >+ fpo->rx_descriptor_status = dev->rx_descriptor_status;
> >+ fpo->tx_descriptor_status = dev->tx_descriptor_status;
> >+
> >+ fpo->rxq.data = dev->data->rx_queues;
> >+ fpo->rxq.clbk = (void **)(uintptr_t)dev->post_rx_burst_cbs;
> >+
> >+ fpo->txq.data = dev->data->tx_queues;
> >+ fpo->txq.clbk = (void **)(uintptr_t)dev->pre_tx_burst_cbs;
> >+}
> >diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.h b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.h
> >index 3724429577..40333e7651 100644
> >--- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.h
> >+++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.h
> >@@ -26,4 +26,11 @@ eth_find_device(const struct rte_eth_dev
> >*_start, rte_eth_cmp_t cmp,
> > /* Parse devargs value for representor parameter. */
> > int rte_eth_devargs_parse_representor_ports(char *str, void *data);
> >
> >+/* reset eth 'fast' API to dummy values */
> >+void eth_dev_fp_ops_reset(struct rte_eth_fp_ops *fpo);
> >+
> >+/* setup eth 'fast' API to ethdev values */
> >+void eth_dev_fp_ops_setup(struct rte_eth_fp_ops *fpo,
> >+ const struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >+
> > #endif /* _ETH_PRIVATE_H_ */
> >diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> >index 424bc260fa..9fbb1bc3db 100644
> >--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> >+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> >@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
> > static const char *MZ_RTE_ETH_DEV_DATA = "rte_eth_dev_data";
> > struct rte_eth_dev rte_eth_devices[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> >
> >+/* public 'fast' API */
> >+struct rte_eth_fp_ops rte_eth_fp_ops[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> >+
> > /* spinlock for eth device callbacks */
> > static rte_spinlock_t eth_dev_cb_lock = RTE_SPINLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> >
> >@@ -1788,6 +1791,9 @@ rte_eth_dev_start(uint16_t port_id)
> > (*dev->dev_ops->link_update)(dev, 0);
> > }
> >
> >+ /* expose selection of PMD rx/tx function */
> >+ eth_dev_fp_ops_setup(rte_eth_fp_ops + port_id, dev);
> >+
>
> Secondary process will not set these properly I believe as it might not
> call start() if it does primary process ops will not be set.
That's a very good point, have to admit - I missed that part.
>
> One simple solution is to call ops_setup() around rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary()
> but if application doesn't invoke start() on Primary the ops will not be set for it.
I think rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary() wouldn't work, as majority of the PMDs setup
fast ops function pointers after it.
From reading the code rte_eth_dev_probing_finish() seems like a good choice -
as it is always the final point in device initialization for secondary process.
BTW, we also need something similar at de-init phase.
rte_eth_dev_release_port() seems like a good candidate for it.
>
> > rte_ethdev_trace_start(port_id);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >@@ -1810,6 +1816,9 @@ rte_eth_dev_stop(uint16_t port_id)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >+ /* point rx/tx functions to dummy ones */
> >+ eth_dev_fp_ops_reset(rte_eth_fp_ops + port_id);
> >+
> > dev->data->dev_started = 0;
> > ret = (*dev->dev_ops->dev_stop)(dev);
> > rte_ethdev_trace_stop(port_id, ret);
> >2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-03 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-02 0:14 Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2021-10-03 21:10 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-22 14:09 [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/5] hide eth dev related structures Konstantin Ananyev
2021-10-01 14:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] " Konstantin Ananyev
2021-10-01 14:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] ethdev: copy ethdev 'fast' API into separate structure Konstantin Ananyev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB4491AF0A3D321806CBE791169AAD9@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ed.czeck@atomicrules.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=hyonkim@cisco.com \
--cc=irusskikh@marvell.com \
--cc=jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jianwang@trustnetic.com \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=john.miller@atomicrules.com \
--cc=johndale@cisco.com \
--cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mczekaj@marvell.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=oulijun@huawei.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
--cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).