Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct

["Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>]

> The structure rte_security_session is not directly used
> by the application. The application just need an opaque
> pointer to attached to the mbuf or rte_crypto_op while
> enqueue. Hence, it can be hidden inside the library
> and would prevent unnecessary indirection to the priv
> session data in fastpath.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index c540c90f8e..8da1c2648c 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -159,3 +159,7 @@ Deprecation Notices
>  * security: The functions ``rte_security_set_pkt_metadata`` and
>    ``rte_security_get_userdata`` will be made inline functions and additional
>    flags will be added in structure ``rte_security_ctx`` in DPDK 21.11.
> +
> +* security: Hide stucture ``rte_security_session`` and expose an opaque
> +  pointer for the private data to the application which can be attached
> +  to the packet while enqueuing.
> --

Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>

> 2.25.1