From: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"pallavi.kadam@intel.com" <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
"navasile@linux.microsoft.com" <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>,
"dmitrym@microsoft.com" <dmitrym@microsoft.com>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] eal/windows: fix build warnings in MinGW
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:01:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB39453D5E34E78C52E5EC62E2A4489@DM6PR12MB3945.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210419230936.04e2f95c@sovereign>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] eal/windows: fix build warnings in MinGW
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> 2021-04-19 15:29 (UTC-0400), Aaron Conole:
> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
> >
> > > 19/04/2021 20:06, Tal Shnaiderman:
> > >> > > 2021-04-18 19:04 (UTC+0000), Tal Shnaiderman:
> > >> > > > > 18/04/2021 19:08, Tal Shnaiderman:
> > >> > > > > > the strncasecmp marco defined in rte_os_shim.h is already
> > >> > > > > > defined in MinGW-w64, as a result the compiler prints out
> > >> > > > > > the warning below on function redefinition whenever
> > >> > > > > > compiling a file including the
> > >> > > header.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > ..\lib/librte_eal/windows/include/rte_os_shim.h:21:
> > >> > > > > > warning: "strncasecmp" redefined #define strncasecmp(s1,
> > >> > > > > > s2,
> > >> > > > > > count) _strnicmp(s1, s2, count)
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Why the tests are passing? Are we allowing warnings in build
> test?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > It's a good question, I see CI is passing without warnings,
> > >> > > > Dmitry can you
> > >> > > reproduce it?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On my side the collision is with the following file:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > C:/mingw-w64/x86_64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-
> > >> > > mingw32/include/string.h:119:
> > >> > > > note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > >> > > > #define strncasecmp _strnicmp
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'm using:
> > >> > > > -gcc (x86_64-win32-seh-rev0, Built by MinGW-W64 project)
> > >> > > > 8.1.0 -meson
> > >> > > > 0.53.2
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I can't reproduce it using the same versions.
> > >> > > Do you invoke meson with other options than "-Dexamples=..."?
> > >> >
> > >> > This is the meson line I'm using:
> > >> >
> > >> > meson "-Dexamples=helloworld" build --wipe
> > >> > --default-library=static -- buildtype debug
> > >> >
> > >> > The problem however is that MinGW's string.h defines the macro in
> > >> > line 119, for some reason my build includes it and the rest doesn't.
> > >>
> > >> Hi Dmitry,
> > >>
> > >> I also noticed warnings in clang on my setup that are related to
> rte_os_shim.h:
> > >>
> > >> [185/314] Compiling C object
> drivers/a715181@@tmp_rte_common_mlx5@sta/common_mlx5_mlx5_co
> mmon_mp.c.obj.
> > >> In file included from ../drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common_mp.c:13:
> > >> In file included from ..\drivers\common/mlx5/mlx5_common_utils.h:8:
> > >> In file included from ..\drivers\common/mlx5/mlx5_common.h:17:
> > >> ..\lib/librte_eal/windows/include\rte_os_shim.h:22:51: warning:
> > >> token pasting of ',' and __VA_ARGS__ is a GNU extension
> > >> [-Wgnu-zero-variadic-macro-arguments]
> > >> #define open(path, flags, ...) _open(path, flags, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > >> ^ However don't
> > >> see it in CI, I'm using clang version 9.0.1
> > >
> > > It seems we should improve our CI.
> > > Please open suggestions in the CI bugzilla.
> >
> > Please do.
> >
> > Will this only be caught by mingw64 on windows? Will we get the same
> > issues with a linux mingw install? I'm guessing yes, but don't know
> > mingw very well. We may be able to install the mingw package under
> > our github actions pipeline.
>
> Yes, Linux MinGW-w64 produces the same warning (about strncasecmp).
> __VA_ARGS__ warning won't show up with GNU compiler, obviously.
> It may with ICC, but I don't have it to check.
>
> I figured out it's not --default-library=static, but --buildtype=debug that
> caues the arning to appear, my mistake in previous message.
Right, using --buildtype=release doesn't reproduce the error.
BTW, how does release build passes if I excluded the definition from RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-18 17:08 [dpdk-dev] " Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-18 18:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-18 19:04 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-18 20:23 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-19 6:57 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-19 18:06 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-19 18:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 19:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] " Aaron Conole
2021-04-19 20:09 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-19 20:33 ` Lincoln Lavoie
2021-04-20 11:01 ` Tal Shnaiderman [this message]
2021-04-19 19:45 ` [dpdk-dev] " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-19 18:55 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-21 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-26 15:58 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-05-04 17:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR12MB39453D5E34E78C52E5EC62E2A4489@DM6PR12MB3945.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=talshn@nvidia.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitrym@microsoft.com \
--cc=navasile@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).