From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
Andrew Boyer <aboyer@pensando.io>,
Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>,
"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
Devendra Singh Rawat <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>,
Ed Czeck <ed.czeck@atomicrules.com>,
Evgeny Schemeilin <evgenys@amazon.com>,
Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>, Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>,
Guoyang Zhou <zhouguoyang@huawei.com>,
Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
"heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com" <heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Hyong Youb Kim <hyonkim@cisco.com>,
Igor Chauskin <igorch@amazon.com>,
Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>,
Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>,
Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
Jian Wang <jianwang@trustnetic.com>,
Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>,
John Miller <john.miller@atomicrules.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>, Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>,
"NBU-Contact-longli (EXTERNAL)" <longli@microsoft.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
Martin Spinler <spinler@cesnet.cz>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
Matt Peters <matt.peters@windriver.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Michal Krawczyk <mk@semihalf.com>,
"Min Hu (Connor" <humin29@huawei.com>,
Pradeep Kumar Nalla <pnalla@marvell.com>,
Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <radhac@marvell.com>,
Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>, Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>,
Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com>,
Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>,
Shai Brandes <shaibran@amazon.com>,
Shepard Siegel <shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com>,
Somalapuram Amaranath <asomalap@amd.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Steven Webster <steven.webster@windriver.com>,
Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
Tetsuya Mukawa <mtetsuyah@gmail.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
Xiaoyun Wang <cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com>,
Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>,
Ziyang Xuan <xuanziyang2@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: support priority based flow control
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:31:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM8PR12MB54005203A1CE15E9B9A1C9CDD6619@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1O3LL2SGDbHj=skRAhd32JhA+c+4OAQ_544d_Gibs3fCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jerin,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 12:58 PM
> To: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 3:20 PM Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jerin,
>
> Hi Ori,
>
> >
> > Sorry for my late response,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 11:49 AM
> > > To: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: support priority based flow control
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:32 PM <jerinj@marvell.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > > >
> > > > rte_eth_dev_priority_flow_ctrl_set() based API is not generic as it
> > > > can not support other than VLAN priority mapping to PFC traffic class.
> > > >
> > > > Introducing RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PFC_SET_TC rte_flow action to
> > > > set the traffic class as per 802.1Qbb specification. This will enable,
> > > > Traffic class(8bit) to be selected based on any packet field like DSCP.
> > > >
> > > > Also, making it as rte_flow action will enable fine control on
> > > > traffic class selection to a specific queue or VF etc.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > >
> > > Ping. If there are no comments on RFC, Planning to send v1 for 22.02.
> >
> > All the set type of functions are going to be deprecated.
> > you should use RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MODIFY_FIELD.
> >
> > What is the item that you are matching on when using rte_flow? Is it part of the tci in the vlan item?
>
> TC can be VLAN TCI field or DSCP field in IP header or any other field
> in packet.
> We need to set the traffic class as per 802.1Qbb specification, May I
> know how the "modify"
> attribute helps here. It should be a "set" operation. Right?
>
Yes, in the rte_flow_action_modify_field there is what operation you want to do,
in this case the action should be set.
I assume that you are trying to set the VLAN tag priority field right?
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Planning to submit the testpmd and cnxk ethdev driver changes after receiving
> > > > the feedback on this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c | 1 +
> > > > lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > > > index 2b42d5ec8c..e59f8a2902 100644
> > > > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > > > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > > > @@ -2999,6 +2999,30 @@ which is set in the packet meta-data (i.e. struct
> ``rte_mbuf::sched::color``)
> > > > | ``meter_color`` | Packet color |
> > > > +-----------------+--------------+
> > > >
> > > > +Action: ``PFC_SET_TC``
> > > > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > +
> > > > +Set traffic class as per PFC (802.1Qbb) specification.
> > > > +
> > > > +This action must be used with any of the following action.
> > > > +
> > > > +- ``RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE``
> > > > +- ``RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_RSS``
> > > > +- ``RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PF``
> > > > +- ``RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VF``
> > > > +- ``RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PHY_PORT``
> > > > +- ``RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID``
> > > > +
> >
> > Why? All the above actions are terminating actions so if I want ot match on the value
> > it doesn't make sense to have it only on the last rule.
>
> In PFC, we are specifying, Given TC needs to steer to specific Queue,
> RSS, PF etc.
> Not sure how other actions are relevant for SET_TC action. Do you have any
> specific action in mind where SET_TC valid in addition to above actions
>
First what happens in case of egress traffic? There is no dest action.
Second what happens if for example the priority is based on the outer tunnel
which I want decap and at a latter stage I want to do connection tracking and only
if everything is correct I want to send this packet to a queue?
>
>
> >
> > > > +.. _table_rte_flow_action_pfc_set_tc:
> > > > +
> > > > +.. table:: PFC_SET_PRIORITY
> > > > +
> > > > + +-----------------+-------------------------------------+
> > > > + | Field | Value |
> > > > + +=================+=====================================+
> > > > + | ``tc`` | Traffic class as per PFC (802.1Qbb) |
> > > > + +-----------------+-------------------------------------+
> > > > +
> > > > Negative types
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > > > index 8cb7a069c8..75c661159e 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > > > @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static const struct rte_flow_desc_data rte_flow_desc_action[] = {
> > > > */
> > > > MK_FLOW_ACTION(INDIRECT, 0),
> > > > MK_FLOW_ACTION(CONNTRACK, sizeof(struct rte_flow_action_conntrack)),
> > > > + MK_FLOW_ACTION(PFC_SET_TC, sizeof(struct rte_flow_action_pfc_set_tc)),
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > int
> > > > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > > index 7b1ed7f110..5298418e9e 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > > @@ -2409,6 +2409,13 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
> > > > * See struct rte_flow_action_meter_color.
> > > > */
> > > > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_METER_COLOR,
> > > > +
> > > > + /**
> > > > + * Set traffic class as per PFC (802.1Qbb) specification.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * See struct rte_flow_action_pfc_set_tc.
> > > > + */
> > > > + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PFC_SET_TC,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > @@ -3168,6 +3175,26 @@ struct rte_flow_action_meter_color {
> > > > enum rte_color color; /**< Packet color. */
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * @warning
> > > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior notice
> > > > + *
> > > > + * RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PFC_SET_TC
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Set traffic class as per PFC (802.1Qbb) specification.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This action must be used any of the following action.
> > > > + * - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE,
> > > > + * - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_RSS,
> > > > + * - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PF,
> > > > + * - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VF,
> > > > + * - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PHY_PORT,
> > > > + * - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID
> > > > + */
> >
> > What does it mean? I must use it only on rules that have one of the above actions?
>
> See above.
>
> >
> > > > +struct rte_flow_action_pfc_set_tc {
> > > > + uint8_t tc; /**< Traffic class as per PFC (802.1Qbb) specification */
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > /**
> > > > * Field IDs for MODIFY_FIELD action.
> > > > */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.33.0
> > > >
> >
> > Best,
> > Ori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 12:59 jerinj
2021-11-17 9:48 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-21 9:50 ` Ori Kam
2021-11-23 10:58 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-23 19:07 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-11-24 9:31 ` Ori Kam [this message]
2021-11-24 10:48 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-24 16:00 ` Ori Kam
2021-11-25 11:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-25 14:02 ` Ori Kam
2021-11-26 6:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-28 11:31 ` Ori Kam
2021-11-28 11:37 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-29 14:54 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-12-04 17:30 ` Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM8PR12MB54005203A1CE15E9B9A1C9CDD6619@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=aboyer@pensando.io \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dsinghrawat@marvell.com \
--cc=ed.czeck@atomicrules.com \
--cc=evgenys@amazon.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=grive@u256.net \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=heinrich.kuhn@corigine.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=hyonkim@cisco.com \
--cc=igorch@amazon.com \
--cc=irusskikh@marvell.com \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
--cc=jianwang@trustnetic.com \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=john.miller@atomicrules.com \
--cc=johndale@cisco.com \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lironh@marvell.com \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=matt.peters@windriver.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mk@semihalf.com \
--cc=mtetsuyah@gmail.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=oulijun@huawei.com \
--cc=pnalla@marvell.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=radhac@marvell.com \
--cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
--cc=rmody@marvell.com \
--cc=rosen.xu@intel.com \
--cc=sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=shaibran@amazon.com \
--cc=shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com \
--cc=shshaikh@marvell.com \
--cc=skori@marvell.com \
--cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=spinler@cesnet.cz \
--cc=steven.webster@windriver.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=vburru@marvell.com \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=xuanziyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
--cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
--cc=zhouguoyang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).