DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ji, Kai" <kai.ji@intel.com>
To: Moses Young <mosesyyoung@gmail.com>,
	Yang Ming <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix QP release in secondary
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:46:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DS0PR11MB74589B3EB4B98A5DE37AF748819CA@DS0PR11MB7458.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7cf98921-1ca2-4707-a0fd-609c1d2cce65@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4530 bytes --]

Hi Yangming,

How did you configure the queue pairs differently between the primary and secondary processes?

The application must call rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup() with a unique qp_id for each process. This implies that each process should receive distinct queue pair configurations at runtime. From what I can tell, it’s likely that the secondary process is still using the same queue pair as the primary process.

Regards

Kai




________________________________
From: Moses Young <mosesyyoung@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2025 11:10
To: Ji, Kai <kai.ji@intel.com>; Yang Ming <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>; dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix QP release in secondary


On 5/7/2025 11:25 PM, Ji, Kai wrote:

Hi Yangming,

PID check is implemented here:
https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/75f179ebe347b6098cf3af26d3d3b7168fe3fe24/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c#L376

Can you share the steps to re-produce the error ?

Regards

Kai

________________________________
From: Yang Ming
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 15:26
To: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix QP release in secondary

Hi,

On 2025/4/7 13:25, Yang Ming wrote:
> From: myang <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com><mailto:ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>
>
> When a secondary process tries to release a queue pair (QP) that
> does not belong to it, error logs occur:
> CRYPTODEV: ipsec_mb_ipc_request() line 373: Unable to release
> qp_id=0
> EAL: Message data is too long
> EAL: Fail to handle message: ipsec_mb_mp_msg
> EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /tmp/dpdk/l2hi/mp_socket:
> ipsec_mb_mp_msg
>
> This patch ensures that a secondary process only frees a QP if
> it actually owns it, preventing conflicts and resolving the
> issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: myang <ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com><mailto:ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com>
> ---
>   drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c | 7 +++++--
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c
> index 910efb1a97..50ee140ccd 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ int
>   ipsec_mb_qp_release(struct rte_cryptodev *dev, uint16_t qp_id)
>   {
>        struct ipsec_mb_qp *qp = dev->data->queue_pairs[qp_id];
> +     uint16_t process_id = (uint16_t)getpid();
>
>        if (!qp)
>                return 0;
> @@ -152,8 +153,10 @@ ipsec_mb_qp_release(struct rte_cryptodev *dev, uint16_t qp_id)
>                rte_free(qp);
>                dev->data->queue_pairs[qp_id] = NULL;
>        } else { /* secondary process */
> -             return ipsec_mb_secondary_qp_op(dev->data->dev_id, qp_id,
> -                                     NULL, 0, RTE_IPSEC_MB_MP_REQ_QP_FREE);
> +             if (qp->qp_used_by_pid == process_id)
> +                     return ipsec_mb_secondary_qp_op(dev->data->dev_id,
> +                                             qp_id, NULL, 0,
> +                                             RTE_IPSEC_MB_MP_REQ_QP_FREE);
>        }
>        return 0;
>   }

Hi Experts,

Is there any chance to review and accept this patch?

Brs,

Yang Ming

Hi,

David. Thanks for your feedback. I will Cc maintainers in next version.

Kai, Thanks for your feedback. Here's our test steps after applying the previous patch called "eal: prevent socket closure before MP sync" in this serious:
1. Start the primary process: Run the DPDK primary process with the IPsec MB crypto device.
2. Launch the secondary process: Start a DPDK secondary process using the same device parameters.
3. Exit the secondary normally.

On secondary exit, error logs show below as my commit log's description:
CRYPTODEV: ipsec_mb_ipc_request() line 373: Unable to release qp_id=0
EAL: Message data is too long
EAL: Fail to handle message: ipsec_mb_mp_msg
EAL: Fail to recv reply for request /tmp/dpdk/l2hi/mp_socket: ipsec_mb_mp_msg

This message corresponds exactly to the PID check in the code you referenced:
if (qp->qp_used_by_pid != req_param->process_id) {
    CDEV_LOG_ERR("Unable to release qp_id=%d", qp_id);
    goto out;
}

In our view, this log indicates an abnormal condition: a secondary process should be able to release its own QPs without triggering an error during normal shutdown.

Thanks for your help.

Best,
Yang Ming

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10717 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2025-05-19 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14 10:36 [PATCH] eal: prevent socket closure before MP sync Yang Ming
2025-03-17 13:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-03-27  9:28   ` [External] " Yang Ming
2025-04-07  3:52     ` Yang Ming
2025-04-07  5:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Yang Ming
2025-04-07  5:25   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix QP release in secondary Yang Ming
2025-04-24 14:26     ` Yang Ming
2025-05-05 15:31       ` David Marchand
2025-05-07 15:25       ` Ji, Kai
2025-05-12 10:10         ` Moses Young
2025-05-19 10:46           ` Ji, Kai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DS0PR11MB74589B3EB4B98A5DE37AF748819CA@DS0PR11MB7458.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=kai.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ming.1.yang@nokia-sbell.com \
    --cc=mosesyyoung@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).