From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20302BCD
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:58:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2016 04:58:15 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,385,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="930854593"
Received: from irsmsx152.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.66])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2016 04:58:16 -0700
Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.13]) by
 IRSMSX152.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:58:14 +0000
From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
CC: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org"
 <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: arch check in example dpdk_qat
Thread-Index: AQHRhPQJgUegAD4wskCY7lQfmq0XzZ9oahGAgAAE34CAAA+loA==
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:58:13 +0000
Message-ID: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8973C8CF87A@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <3286701.A42TaaeMmo@xps13>
 <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8973C8CF6DC@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <45589310.A2cUW16xOY@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <45589310.A2cUW16xOY@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiM2NmYTA3YzgtNWRiOC00NjIxLWI2ZGUtNzA1NmM1NjlkNmJmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IlhTdW9FdmNnT0FqaktQUUszZVBEMWdzeDVMYk5PczNIYmM5bHdKZkZNd0k9In0=
x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] arch check in example dpdk_qat
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:58:17 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:01 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: arch check in example dpdk_qat
>=20
> 2016-03-24 10:50, De Lara Guarch, Pablo:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > > When reading examples/dpdk_qat/Makefile, we can see this check:
> > >
> > >     ifneq ($(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH),"x86_64")
> > >         ifneq ($(LBITS),i686)
> > >         $(error The RTE_TARGET chosen is not compatible with this
> environment
> > > \
> > >         (x86_64), for this application. Please change the definition =
of the \
> > >         RTE_TARGET environment variable, or run the application on a =
32-bit
> > > OS)
> > >         endif
> > >     endif
> > >
> > > Is it on purpose to limit the 32-bit support to i686 only?
> > > Instead of the message "run the application on a 32-bit OS", should i=
t be
> > > "on an i686 OS"?
> >
> > i686 OS looks fine to me. Basically, when this app was made, the only 3=
2-bit
> target was i686,
>=20
> What about i386, i486, i586 builds ?

We only support i686, no other 32-bit architectures.
>=20
> > and the app needs the QAT driver to be running in 32 bits, if DPDK targ=
et is
> 32-bit.