From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C268E56 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 18:40:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2016 09:40:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,296,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="1046883668" Received: from irsmsx154.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.96]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2016 09:40:10 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.71]) by IRSMSX154.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.208]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:40:08 +0100 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: Stephen Finucane Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade Thread-Index: AQHSCRjm7hnuWnh6U0uc0KXo+N4sl6BuOHSQ Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:40:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1736050.3Z5tnqk6B6@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1736050.3Z5tnqk6B6@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYWJiNGI0YTMtNTM1MC00ZmQyLWJlZTQtYzQyMjAwYzExYWExIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IlNUZHZcL2lvcEpibm4wYUV4TWdlQnVoMWE0cTlqXC9cL01VdXBPd3ZlNnltcjg9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 16:40:12 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 8:02 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Stephen Finucane > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > Patchwork is upgraded from a pre-0.9 version to 1.1.1: > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork >=20 > This new version brings 2 new columns: >=20 > - A/R/T for Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by counters. > Unfortunately it does not yet parse the cover letter of a series. >=20 > - S/W/F for Success/Warning/Fail counters in tests. > It will help to integrate the reports of distributed CI from > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/test-report/ >=20 > If you have some concerns or comments about this new version, > please reply here. I'm sure Stephen Finucane (cc'ed) will be > interested by our feedbacks. Good news that patchwork is getting better :) I am looking at it, and I see two issues: - There are some patches that have been acked, but I don't see that in patc= hwork (e.g. http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15381/) - Is there any way to see if patches in a patchset have been acked? Usually, patchsets are acked by replying to the cover letter, but this is not going to be reflected in Patchwork, correct? =20 Thanks for the work, Pablo > Thanks