From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15C81B1BD; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:34:57 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2018 01:34:56 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,381,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="11605199" Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2018 01:34:55 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.167]) by IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:34:55 +0000 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Nelio Laranjeiro , "dev@dpdk.org" , Olivier Matz CC: "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" , "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix SPI byte order in flow item Thread-Index: AQHTir0AQCc5joyG+0qQ4JD40zNS5KN6+9lw Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:34:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMDBhYWU0NGMtNGQzZC00ODcxLTg4M2ItZWViNWFjZmJkOWQwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkMxa0hIMTIwYURscFwvdkNTdTU4M3VLOXdMZjQ3VDVyd2FPd3J4SXR6eHFZPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix SPI byte order in flow item X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:34:58 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nelio Laranjeiro > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 9:16 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org; Olivier Matz > Cc: akhil.goyal@nxp.com > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix SPI byte order = in > flow item >=20 > SPI field is defined in the RFC2406 [1] as a big endian field it should b= e > provided in its final form to the drivers through RTE flow. >=20 > Fixes: ec17993a145a ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support security offload") > Cc: akhil.goyal@nxp.com Cc'ing stable ML. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro Applied to dpdk-next-crypto. Thanks, Pablo