DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"Ye, Xiaolong" <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] net/ice: optimize protocol extraction by dynamic mbuf API
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:04:41 +0000
Message-ID: <E3B9F2FDCB65864C82CD632F23D8AB8773D90615@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2644972.cy8Zfzkded@xps>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 22:40
> To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.matz@6wind.com; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] net/ice: optimize protocol extraction by dynamic mbuf API
> 
> 08/11/2019 15:08, Wang, Haiyue:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 20:34
> > > To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.matz@6wind.com; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> > > <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] net/ice: optimize protocol extraction by dynamic mbuf API
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I see this patch is already merged in next-net-intel,
> > > but please I would prefer to have below improvements first.
> > >
> > > 07/11/2019 11:44, Haiyue Wang:
> > > > The original design is to use rte_mbuf::udata64 to save the metadata of
> > > > protocol extraction which has network protocol data fields and type, a
> > > > private API is used to decode this metadata.
> > > >
> > > > Use the dynamic mbuf field and flags to register the needed fields in
> > > > mbuf, to avoid overwriting 'rte_mbuf::udata64' if the application uses
> > > > it. It only needs 4B size to save the protocol extraction data, and its
> > >
> > > Yes using a dynamic field is definitely more correct.
> > >
> > > > type and validity is indicated by related bit in 'rte_mbuf::ol_flags'.
> > >
> > > Better to say explicitly it uses a dynamic flag.
> > >
> >
> > Will update doc to make the description be better.
> >
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ice/rte_pmd_ice.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/rte_pmd_ice.h
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * @file rte_pmd_ice.h
> > > > + *
> > > > + * ice PMD specific functions.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change, or be removed, without prior notice
> > > > + *
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > Adding the file in doxygen is good.
> > > I think it could be a separate patch for doxygen + cleanups.
> > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * The supported network protocol extraction metadata format.
> > > > + */
> > > > +union proto_xtr_metadata {
> > > > -struct proto_xtr_flds {
> > >
> > > Please add a prefix rte_ice_ or rte_net_ice_ as you wish.
> > >
> >
> > Missed, will be updated.
> >
> > > [...]
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * The mbuf dynamic flag for VLAN protocol extraction metadata, it is valid
> > > > + * when dev_args 'proto_xtr' has 'vlan' specified.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define PKT_RX_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_VLAN \
> > > > +	(rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_vlan_mask)
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * The mbuf dynamic flag for IPv4 protocol extraction metadata, it is valid
> > > > + * when dev_args 'proto_xtr' has 'ipv4' specified.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define PKT_RX_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_IPV4 \
> > > > +	(rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv4_mask)
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * The mbuf dynamic flag for IPv6 protocol extraction metadata, it is valid
> > > > + * when dev_args 'proto_xtr' has 'ipv6' specified.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define PKT_RX_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_IPV6 \
> > > > +	(rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv6_mask)
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * The mbuf dynamic flag for IPv6 with flow protocol extraction metadata, it is
> > > > + * valid when dev_args 'proto_xtr' has 'ipv6_flow' specified.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define PKT_RX_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_IPV6_FLOW \
> > > > +	(rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv6_flow_mask)
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * The mbuf dynamic flag for TCP protocol extraction metadata, it is valid
> > > > + * when dev_args 'proto_xtr' has 'tcp' specified.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define PKT_RX_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_TCP \
> > > > +	(rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_tcp_mask)
> > >
> > > Those fields and flags are missing a RTE_ prefix.
> > > (Yes I know we are missing such prefix in rte_mbuf.f)
> > >
> >
> > The "PKT_RX_" in ' lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h' will be changed to
> > "RTE_PKT_RX_" ?
> 
> I started to do such change a long time ago and never finished.
> Yes it will be changed for 20.11.
> 
> > Or keep the above as it is now, to keep the same ol_flags style, until all
> > the "PKT_RX_" are changed ?
> 
> Please I prefer you change yours, without waiting global change.
> 

OK, will update it.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-08 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-26 17:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/ice: use dynamic mbuf API to handle protocol extraction Haiyue Wang
2019-10-29  7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ice: optimize protocol extraction by dynamic mbuf API Haiyue Wang
2019-10-30 16:56   ` Olivier Matz
2019-10-31  1:16     ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-11-01  3:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-01 12:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-01 16:19       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-05  1:19         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-05  1:26           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-07  5:35           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-07  9:08             ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-11-07 10:38               ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-11-07 10:44           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-08  2:35             ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-11-08 12:34             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-08 14:08               ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-11-08 14:39                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-08 15:04                   ` Wang, Haiyue [this message]
2019-11-08 15:03               ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-11-08 12:55             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-08 14:01               ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-11-08 14:38                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-08 15:44           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/2] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-08 15:44             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/2] " Haiyue Wang
2019-11-08 15:44             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/2] doc: add the ice PMD doxygen Haiyue Wang
2019-11-08 15:58             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/2] net/ice: optimize protocol extraction by dynamic mbuf API Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-09  1:31               ` Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E3B9F2FDCB65864C82CD632F23D8AB8773D90615@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git