From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA26108F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:00:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2017 02:00:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,243,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1083928034" Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.3]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2017 02:00:00 -0800 Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.230]) by IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.173]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:00:00 +0000 From: "Van Haaren, Harry" To: Jerin Jacob CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Richardson, Bruce" Thread-Topic: [PATCH 01/15] eventdev: remove unneeded dependencies Thread-Index: AQHScA8B1ZTF6ptykE2JsnUoCDM6YKE8Y04AgAAL67A= Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:59:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1484581255-148720-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <1484581255-148720-2-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <20170117091139.GA17275@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20170117091139.GA17275@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMDg3NGVhNDYtYjBkYy00NjRiLWE3ZWItNjNhOGIyMDUwMGMyIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IktBZzRpR0lJcEVNY1wvUU91cVwvT2wwME9lOEUzb2QxU045YWlQVHJTUmhVWT0ifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/15] eventdev: remove unneeded dependencies X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:00:04 -0000 > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com] > > > > #include > > -#include > > -#include > > +#include > > + > > +struct rte_mbuf; /* we just use mbuf pointers; no need to include rte_= mbuf.h */ >=20 > This "struct rte_mbuf" reference is not present in dpdk-next-eventdev tre= e. > Are you planning to rebase to dpdk-next-eventdev? The idea was to remove the include of the header file, as we never derefere= nce the mbuf pointer, and hence we shouldn't include a header we don't requ= ire. The struct rte_mbuf here is just a forward declaration for the actual rte_m= buf. This allows the rte_event to contain a struct rte_mbuf* without the co= mpiler complaining that it doesn't understand the type. The current patches apply to dpdk-next-eventdev HEAD, I don't think I under= stand what you're asking about rebasing.