DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] service core concept header implementation
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 13:27:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA612A3C594@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583FAF76D7@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi All,


<snip> Service Cores RFC, more details and discussion </snip>


> Though I think both PMD/core libraries  and app layer might be interested in that: i.e.
> app might also have some background processing tasks, that might need to be run
> on several cores (or core slices).


Thanks everybody for the input on the RFC - appreciated! From an application point-of-view, I see merit in Konstantin's suggestions for the API, over the RFC I sent previously. I will re-work the API taking inspiration from both APIs and send an RFCv2, you'll be on CC :)


Cheers, -Harry

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-25 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-03 11:29 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] Service Cores concept Harry van Haaren
2017-05-03 11:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] service core concept header implementation Harry van Haaren
2017-05-04  6:35   ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-04 12:01     ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-05 15:48       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-05-06 14:26         ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-17 12:47   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-05-17 12:58     ` Bruce Richardson
2017-05-17 13:47       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-05-25 13:27         ` Van Haaren, Harry [this message]
2017-05-16 22:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] Service Cores concept Thomas Monjalon
2017-05-16 22:48   ` Wiles, Keith
2017-05-17 10:32   ` Bruce Richardson
2017-05-17 11:28     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-05-17 12:36       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-05-17 14:51       ` [dpdk-dev] Discuss plugin threading model for DPDK Wiles, Keith
2017-05-17 15:46         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA612A3C594@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).