From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064672B8B for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 04:08:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2018 19:08:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,325,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="35038924" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2018 19:08:52 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:08:52 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.79]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.240]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:07:47 +0800 From: "Hu, Jiayu" To: Ophir Munk , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Mark Kavanagh" CC: Thomas Monjalon , Olga Shern Thread-Topic: TCP GSO support above IPv6 Thread-Index: AdPaSHbq8t4Ov0OZQh2SjqcWQlOevwAVfkdAAC5egjAAOIBYgA== Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 02:07:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.200.100 dlp-reaction: no-action x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZDkxZTNlNmYtZjJlYi00ZWU2LTlhNTAtMjVmM2RmZmM0Mzk2IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6ImpuVk5reHk3eVUrTDlERlBPdllIMDJFQ1l2dHp2WlJ4NXVOd3JXRWpYUDg9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP GSO support above IPv6 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 02:08:54 -0000 Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ophir Munk [mailto:ophirmu@mellanox.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 7:13 AM > To: Hu, Jiayu ; dev@dpdk.org; Mark Kavanagh > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Olga Shern > > Subject: RE: TCP GSO support above IPv6 >=20 > Hi, > Please see inline >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hu, Jiayu [mailto:jiayu.hu@intel.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 4:07 AM > > To: Ophir Munk ; dev@dpdk.org; Mark > Kavanagh > > > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Olga Shern > > > > Subject: RE: TCP GSO support above IPv6 > > > > Hi Ophir, > > > > Comparing with IPv6, IPv4 is used more widely used and more popular. > > Therefore, when proposed the GSO library, we just planned to support > IPv4. > > > > Do you have any usage scenarios that depend on IPv6? >=20 > The same usage scenarios with IPv4 may be applicable to IPv6 since the > application requesting TSO at layer 4 may not care about which IP is used= at > layer 3. OK. We have plan to support IPv6, but which release is not decided. Thanks, Jiayu >=20 > > > > Thanks, > > Jiayu > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ophir Munk [mailto:ophirmu@mellanox.com] > > > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 10:45 PM > > > To: dev@dpdk.org; Hu, Jiayu ; Mark Kavanagh > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Olga Shern > > > > > > Subject: TCP GSO support above IPv6 > > > > > > Hello Jiayu, > > > I wonder why librte_gso only supports TCP GSO above IPv4. > > > Can you please explain why TCP GSO is not supported above IPv6? > > > Are there plans to support it? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ophir