From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1134-202.mail.aliyun.com (out1134-202.mail.aliyun.com [42.120.134.202]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835385A32 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:28:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE; BC=0.08768279|-1; FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e02c03276; MF=jun.xiao@cloudnetengine.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=3; RT=3; SR=0; Received: from 192.168.1.104(mailfrom:jun.xiao@cloudnetengine.com ip:113.45.201.174) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(10.147.38.247); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:28:09 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Jun Xiao X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: <738D45BC1F695740A983F43CFE1B7EA92E2BEF4B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:28:09 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <----Tc------lRRzc$3e501353-5ebe-4161-b9d4-01ebdf81a6de@cloudnetengine.com> <738D45BC1F695740A983F43CFE1B7EA92E2BEF4B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> To: "Gray, Mark D" Cc: dev , discuss Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ovs-discuss] vswitches performance comparison X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:28:14 -0000 I'd like to hope that's my methodology problem, but I just follow the instal= lation guide without any customization. Hi Mark, do you have any performance data share with us? Maybe we are using d= ifferent type of workloads, like I mentioned I am using typical data center w= orkload, I guess you are talking about NFV type of workload? Thanks, Jun Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 22, 2015, at 2:14 AM, Gray, Mark D wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jun >> Xiao >> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:01 PM >> To: discuss; dev >> Subject: [ovs-discuss] vswitches performance comparison >>=20 >> After CloudNetEngine vswitch technical preview is launched, we received >> quite a few queries on vswitches performance comparison, but we cannot >> simply give a test result on our platform because performance varies on >> different H/Ws and different workloads, and that's why we encourage you t= o >> try the evaluation package to get real data on your setup. >>=20 >> Anyway, we share a little more performance data on our H/W which is a >> comparison among native kernel OVS/OVS-DPDK/CNE vswitch under the >> most common workload: >> concurrent bi-directional TCP traffics cross hosts, and hope you can have= a >> rough idea. >> http://www.cloudnetengine.com/weblog/2015/07/22/vswitches- >> performance-comparison/ >=20 > I think there is an issue with you methodology. ovs-dpdk performance shoul= d be > significantly higher than kernel ovs. >=20 >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Jun >> _______________________________________________ >> discuss mailing list >> discuss@openvswitch.org >> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss