From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF5A592A for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 02:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2015 17:56:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,526,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="611162163" Received: from pgsmsx108.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.103]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2015 17:56:21 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:56:20 +0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.129]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.165]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:56:18 +0800 From: "Zhang, Helin" To: "Jeff Venable, Sr." , lhffjzh , 'Thomas Monjalon' Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC Thread-Index: AQHQUwUptdnjFbxdFU2dC7iwa2kdKJ0FeWOAgACnogCA4vqxMIAAAZkg Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:56:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1416936405-25333-1-git-send-email-ssujith@cisco.com> <03fb01d05269$fe8d2110$fba76330$@com> <1566601.Xkl8jJDb44@xps13> <046801d052f8$9090a530$b1b1ef90$@com> <049801d0530f$b866bce0$293436a0$@com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:56:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Venable, Sr. [mailto:jeff@vectranetworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:47 PM > To: Zhang, Helin; lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet = by > i40e NIC >=20 > Is the I40E incapable of operating RSS with ETH_RSS_IP (i.e. hashing with= out L4 > ports)? Why do you think like this? Sorry, I am a bit confused. ETH_RSS_IP is a super set of all IP based rss types. Please see the rss typ= es listed in rte_ethdev.h. The supports rss types of each NIC can be queried via 'struct rte_eth_dev_i= nfo' of field 'flow_type_rss_offloads'. Regards, Helin >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Jeff >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Helin > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 6:34 AM > To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet = by > i40e NIC >=20 > Good to know that! >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lhffjzh [mailto:lhffjzh@126.com] > > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:34 PM > > To: Zhang, Helin; 'Thomas Monjalon' > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network > > packet by i40e NIC > > > > Hi Helin, > > > > Thanks a lot for your great help, all of rx queue received network > > packet after I update rss_hf from "ETH_RSS_IP" to " ETH_RSS_PROTO_MASK = ". > > > > static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf =3D { > > .rxmode =3D { > > .mq_mode =3D ETH_MQ_RX_RSS, > > .max_rx_pkt_len =3D ETHER_MAX_LEN, > > .split_hdr_size =3D 0, > > .header_split =3D 0, /**< Header Split disabled */ > > .hw_ip_checksum =3D 1, /**< IP checksum offload enabled */ > > .hw_vlan_filter =3D 0, /**< VLAN filtering disabled */ > > .jumbo_frame =3D 0, /**< Jumbo Frame Support disabled */ > > .hw_strip_crc =3D 0, /**< CRC stripped by hardware */ > > }, > > .rx_adv_conf =3D { > > .rss_conf =3D { > > .rss_key =3D NULL, > > .rss_hf =3D ETH_RSS_PROTO_MASK, > > }, > > }, > > .txmode =3D { > > .mq_mode =3D ETH_MQ_TX_NONE, > > }, > > .fdir_conf.mode =3D RTE_FDIR_MODE_SIGNATURE, }; > > > > > > Regards, > > Haifeng > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com] > > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:18 AM > > To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon' > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network > > packet by i40e NIC > > > > Hi Haifeng > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of lhffjzh > > > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 9:48 AM > > > To: 'Thomas Monjalon' > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maintainers@dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0" can receive network > > > packet > > by > > > i40e NIC > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Thanks very much for your reminder, you give me many help in this > > > mail > > list. > > > > > > The issue with detailed information just as below. but I don't know > > > who is > > the > > > dpdk i40e maintainers? is maintainers@dpdk.org? > > > > > > Hardware list: > > > 2 i40e 40G NICs > > > Xeon E5-2670 v2(10 cores) > > > 32G memory > > > > > > I loopback 2 i40e NICs by QSFP cable, one NIC send UDP network > > > packet by DPDK, and another for receiving. I bind 4 processor's > > > logical cores with 4 > > rx > > > queue "0,1,2,3" on receiving NIC, when I start to send packet, only > > > rx > > queue > > > "0" > > > can receive > > > the UDP packet, the others queue always receive nothing. but it is > > > work > > well on > > > ixgbe 10G NICs, I can receive network packet from all rx queues. > > > does > > anyone > > > kindly know why? > > Could you help to list the DPDK version you are using now? > > Two possible reasons: > > 1. UDP rss is not enabled on your board correctly. > > I40e has different rss flags from ixgbe, so I am wondering if you use > > it correctly. > > In addition, this will be unified from 2.0. So I care about the DPDK v= ersion. > > 2. The UDP stream is occasionally hit the hash key of queue 0. > > You'd better to try to send your UDP stream with random 5-tuples, to > > get the > > hash value hit different queues randomly. > > > > Regards, > > Helin > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Haifeng > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:55 PM > > > To: lhffjzh > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by > > > i40e NIC > > > > > > 2015-02-27 16:47, lhffjzh: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue= "0" > > > can > > > > receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of > > > > network packet has same destination ip address but has more than > > > > 200 different source ip address. > > > > > > It's possible that you don't have any answer for 2 reasons: > > > - you replied in a thread dedicated to Cisco enic questions > > > - you didn't describe your usage enough to understand your problem > > > > > > I suggest to use the button "new email" instead of "reply all" to > > > start a new question with enough details. > > > > > > Did you noticed you put some Cisco guys in CC instead of putting the > > > Intel responsible for i40e (see MAINTAINERS file)? > > > > >