From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB00EC524
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:24:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2015 19:24:19 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,663,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="748559910"
Received: from pgsmsx106.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.98])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2015 19:24:18 -0700
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.110.15) by
 PGSMSX106.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:24:16 +0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.165]) by
 SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.129]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:24:14 +0800
From: "Ouyang, Changchun" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, Wei li <liw@dtdream.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] lib_vhost:reset secure_len when
 rte_atomic16_cmpset failed
Thread-Index: AQHQnDHaEUzAWY9ua0WecSx2sBfZXZ2XK9gwgCEoCQCAASrTgA==
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 02:24:14 +0000
Message-ID: <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F962511BC665E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <72a55103-9c65-4f2e-9448-919622dbac81@liw0310-PC.local>
 <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F962511B74CEC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <5707625.FvquhSeuHS@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <5707625.FvquhSeuHS@xps13>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] lib_vhost:reset secure_len when
 rte_atomic16_cmpset failed
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 02:24:21 -0000

Hi Thomas,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 12:34 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun; Wei li
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] lib_vhost:reset secure_len when
> rte_atomic16_cmpset failed
>=20
> 2015-06-01 06:14, Ouyang, Changchun:
> > From: Wei li, June 1, 2015 2:12 PM:
> > > when rte_atomic16_cmpset return 0 in first loop, secure_len  should
> > > be reset to 0 in second loop, otherwise (pkt_len > secure_len)
> > > always  be false, the num of desc maybe not enough
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei li <liw@dtdream.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Changchun Ouyang<changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
>=20
> Is it already fixed by this commit?
> 	http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=3D2927c37ca4e04067

You are right, so no need apply this patch.=20
Thanks
Changchun