From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BED32BB0;
 Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:34:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2017 07:34:17 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,182,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="844121256"
Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2017 07:34:17 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx125.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.40) by
 FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:34:17 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.235]) by
 FMSMSX125.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002;
 Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:34:17 -0700
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
CC: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>, 
 Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-10
Thread-Index: AQHSsccNZXtuAx+B2EabqeOksy73s6G/INmA
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:34:16 +0000
Message-ID: <FF298ED2-DA87-4227-BC91-04EEFBAEC12C@intel.com>
References: <20170330094058.nh2nhk4ko6tsqedn@localhost.localdomain>
 <20170406100142.GA10609@jerin> <20170410064933.GX18844@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170410064933.GX18844@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.254.98.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <26676871DF533648969949C83ABEAA07@intel.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-10
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:34:19 -0000

Did this meeting take place and meet quorum?

What is the out come of the meeting?

> On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:49 AM, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wr=
ote:
>=20
> Hi all,
>=20
> The last techboard meeting was canceled, and it's been rescheduled to
> today, 10th Apr, at 3pm UTC. I should have sent it out a bit earlier.
> Sorry!
>=20
> The agenda remains the same (see below).
>=20
> 	--yliu
>=20
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:31:43PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:11:07 +0530
>>> From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>>> Cc: techboard@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06
>>> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
>>>=20
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>=20
>>> A meeting of the DPDK technical board will occur next Thursday,
>>> April 6th 2017 at 9am UTC?
>>>=20
>>> The meeting takes place on the #dpdk-board channel on IRC.
>>> This meeting is public, so anybody can join, see below for the agenda.
>>>=20
>>> Jerin
>>=20
>> The meeting got canceled due to lack of quorum.
>> (6 out of 9 members were present, which is less than 70%(minimum quorum)=
)
>> # http://dpdk.org/about/techboard#meetings
>>=20
>> Yuanhan Liu volunteered to chair the next meeting.
>> No particular date was agreed for next meeting.
>>=20
>> Yuanhan to follow on mail to select a date/time of next meeting.
>>=20
>>>=20
>>> 1) Divergence between DPDK/Linux PF/VF implementations.
>>>=20
>>> Discussions:
>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060529.html
>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060063.html
>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/053056.html
>>>=20
>>> 2) Representative for the DPDK governance board
>>>=20
>>> 3) Scope of cmdline and cfgfile libraries in DPDK.
>>> Discuss the scope of cmdline and cfgfile libraries in DPDK
>>> and see if we allow more libs like that (Keith proposed a CLI lib),
>>> or we do not do more,
>>> or do we target to replace them by better external equivalents?
>>>=20
>>> 4) Community questions/issues
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20

Regards,
Keith