From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:07:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <HE1PR0801MB202542DBB0EEABEC2A2B085E9E670@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f200402-18e3-93f8-dc8f-a0f254c65032@intel.com>
From: Medvedkin, Vladimir <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 8:37 PM
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; mdr@ashroe.eu; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests
On 07/07/2020 16:15, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com><mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Add performance tests for RCU integration. The performance
difference with and without RCU integration is very small
(~1% to ~2%) on both Arm and x86 platforms.
Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com><mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com><mailto:gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com><mailto:ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 492 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 489 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index 489719c40..dfe186426 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
* Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
*/
#include <stdio.h>
@@ -10,12 +11,27 @@
#include <rte_cycles.h>
#include <rte_random.h>
#include <rte_branch_prediction.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include <rte_ip.h>
#include <rte_lpm.h>
#include "test.h"
#include "test_xmmt_ops.h"
+struct rte_lpm *lpm;
+static struct rte_rcu_qsbr *rv;
+static volatile uint8_t writer_done;
+static volatile uint32_t thr_id;
+static uint64_t gwrite_cycles;
+static uint64_t gwrites;
+/* LPM APIs are not thread safe, use mutex to provide thread safety */
+static pthread_mutex_t lpm_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+
+/* Report quiescent state interval every 1024 lookups. Larger critical
+ * sections in reader will result in writer polling multiple times.
+ */
+#define QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL 1024
+
#define TEST_LPM_ASSERT(cond) do { \
if (!(cond)) { \
printf("Error at line %d: \n", __LINE__); \
@@ -24,6 +40,7 @@
} while(0)
#define ITERATIONS (1 << 10)
+#define RCU_ITERATIONS 10
#define BATCH_SIZE (1 << 12)
#define BULK_SIZE 32
@@ -35,9 +52,13 @@ struct route_rule {
};
static struct route_rule large_route_table[MAX_RULE_NUM];
+/* Route table for routes with depth > 24 */
+struct route_rule large_ldepth_route_table[MAX_RULE_NUM];
static uint32_t num_route_entries;
+static uint32_t num_ldepth_route_entries;
#define NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES num_route_entries
+#define NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES num_ldepth_route_entries
enum {
IP_CLASS_A,
@@ -191,7 +212,7 @@ static void generate_random_rule_prefix(uint32_t ip_class, uint8_t depth)
uint32_t ip_head_mask;
uint32_t rule_num;
uint32_t k;
- struct route_rule *ptr_rule;
+ struct route_rule *ptr_rule, *ptr_ldepth_rule;
if (ip_class == IP_CLASS_A) { /* IP Address class A */
fixed_bit_num = IP_HEAD_BIT_NUM_A;
@@ -236,10 +257,20 @@ static void generate_random_rule_prefix(uint32_t ip_class, uint8_t depth)
*/
start = lrand48() & mask;
ptr_rule = &large_route_table[num_route_entries];
+ ptr_ldepth_rule = &large_ldepth_route_table[num_ldepth_route_entries];
for (k = 0; k < rule_num; k++) {
ptr_rule->ip = (start << (RTE_LPM_MAX_DEPTH - depth))
| ip_head_mask;
ptr_rule->depth = depth;
+ /* If the depth of the route is more than 24, store it
+ * in another table as well.
+ */
+ if (depth > 24) {
+ ptr_ldepth_rule->ip = ptr_rule->ip;
+ ptr_ldepth_rule->depth = ptr_rule->depth;
+ ptr_ldepth_rule++;
+ num_ldepth_route_entries++;
+ }
ptr_rule++;
start = (start + step) & mask;
}
@@ -273,6 +304,7 @@ static void generate_large_route_rule_table(void)
uint8_t depth;
num_route_entries = 0;
+ num_ldepth_route_entries = 0;
memset(large_route_table, 0, sizeof(large_route_table));
for (ip_class = IP_CLASS_A; ip_class <= IP_CLASS_C; ip_class++) {
@@ -316,10 +348,460 @@ print_route_distribution(const struct route_rule *table, uint32_t n)
printf("\n");
}
+/* Check condition and return an error if true. */
+static uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
+static unsigned int num_cores;
+
+/* Simple way to allocate thread ids in 0 to RTE_MAX_LCORE space */
+static inline uint32_t
+alloc_thread_id(void)
+{
+ uint32_t tmp_thr_id;
+
+ tmp_thr_id = __atomic_fetch_add(&thr_id, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ if (tmp_thr_id >= RTE_MAX_LCORE)
+ printf("Invalid thread id %u\n", tmp_thr_id);
+
+ return tmp_thr_id;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Reader thread using rte_lpm data structure without RCU.
+ */
+static int
+test_lpm_reader(void *arg)
+{
+ int i;
+ uint32_t ip_batch[QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL];
+ uint32_t next_hop_return = 0;
+
+ RTE_SET_USED(arg);
+ do {
+ for (i = 0; i < QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL; i++)
+ ip_batch[i] = rte_rand();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL; i++)
+ rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip_batch[i], &next_hop_return);
+
+ } while (!writer_done);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Reader thread using rte_lpm data structure with RCU.
+ */
+static int
+test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader(void *arg)
+{
+ int i;
+ uint32_t thread_id = alloc_thread_id();
+ uint32_t ip_batch[QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL];
+ uint32_t next_hop_return = 0;
+
+ RTE_SET_USED(arg);
+ /* Register this thread to report quiescent state */
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(rv, thread_id);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_online(rv, thread_id);
+
+ do {
+ for (i = 0; i < QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL; i++)
+ ip_batch[i] = rte_rand();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL; i++)
+ rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip_batch[i], &next_hop_return);
+
+ /* Update quiescent state */
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(rv, thread_id);
+ } while (!writer_done);
+
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_offline(rv, thread_id);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(rv, thread_id);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Writer thread using rte_lpm data structure with RCU.
+ */
+static int
+test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
+{
+ unsigned int i, j, si, ei;
+ uint64_t begin, total_cycles;
+ uint8_t core_id = (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
+ uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
+
+ RTE_SET_USED(arg);
+ /* 2 writer threads are used */
+ if (core_id % 2 == 0) {
+ si = 0;
+ ei = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES / 2;
+ } else {
+ si = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES / 2;
+ ei = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ }
+
+ /* Measure add/delete. */
+ begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+ for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+ /* Add all the entries */
+ for (j = si; j < ei; j++) {
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
+ if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
+ large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
+ next_hop_add) != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route# %d\n",
+ i, j);
+ }
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
+ }
+
+ /* Delete all the entries */
+ for (j = si; j < ei; j++) {
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
+ if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
+ large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route# %d\n",
+ i, j);
+ }
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
+ }
+ }
+
+ total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
+
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&gwrite_cycles, total_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&gwrites,
+ 2 * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * RCU_ITERATIONS,
+ __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Functional test:
+ * 2 writers, rest are readers
+ */
+static int
+test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
+{
+ struct rte_lpm_config config;
+ size_t sz;
+ unsigned int i;
+ uint16_t core_id;
+ struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
+
+ if (rte_lcore_count() < 3) {
+ printf("Not enough cores for lpm_rcu_perf_autotest, expecting at least 3\n");
+ return TEST_SKIPPED;
+ }
+
+ num_cores = 0;
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(core_id) {
+ enabled_core_ids[num_cores] = core_id;
+ num_cores++;
+ }
+
+ printf("\nPerf test: 2 writers, %d readers, RCU integration enabled\n",
+ num_cores - 2);
+
+ /* Create LPM table */
+ config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.flags = 0;
+ lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
+
+ /* Init RCU variable */
+ sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
+ rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
+ RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
+
+ rcu_cfg.v = rv;
+ /* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */
+ if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL) != 0) {
+ printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ writer_done = 0;
+ __atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_store_n(&gwrites, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+
+ __atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
+
+ /* Launch reader threads */
+ for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,
+ enabled_core_ids[i]);
+
+ /* Launch writer threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
+ (void *)(uintptr_t)i,
+ enabled_core_ids[i]);
+
+ /* Wait for writer threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
+ goto error;
+
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n",
+ 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
+ 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
+ __atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) /
+ __atomic_load_n(&gwrites, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
+ );
+
+ /* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
+ writer_done = 1;
+ for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
+ goto error;
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+ rte_free(rv);
+ lpm = NULL;
+ rv = NULL;
+
+ /* Test without RCU integration */
+ printf("\nPerf test: 2 writers, %d readers, RCU integration disabled\n",
+ num_cores - 2);
+
+ /* Create LPM table */
+ config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.flags = 0;
+ lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
+
+ writer_done = 0;
+ __atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_store_n(&gwrites, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+ __atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
+
+ /* Launch reader threads */
+ for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_reader, NULL,
+ enabled_core_ids[i]);
+
+ /* Launch writer threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
+ (void *)(uintptr_t)i,
+ enabled_core_ids[i]);
+
+ /* Wait for writer threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
+ goto error;
+
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n",
+ 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
+ 2 * ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
+ __atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) /
+ __atomic_load_n(&gwrites, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
+ );
+
+ writer_done = 1;
+ /* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
+ for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
+ goto error;
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+
+ return 0;
+
+error:
+ writer_done = 1;
+ /* Wait until all readers have exited */
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+ rte_free(rv);
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Functional test:
+ * Single writer, rest are readers
+ */
+static int
+test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
+{
+ struct rte_lpm_config config;
+ uint64_t begin, total_cycles;
+ size_t sz;
+ unsigned int i, j;
+ uint16_t core_id;
+ uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
+ struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
+
+ if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) {
+ printf("Not enough cores for lpm_rcu_perf_autotest, expecting at least 2\n");
+ return TEST_SKIPPED;
+ }
+
+ num_cores = 0;
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(core_id) {
+ enabled_core_ids[num_cores] = core_id;
+ num_cores++;
+ }
+
+ printf("\nPerf test: 1 writer, %d readers, RCU integration enabled\n",
+ num_cores);
+
+ /* Create LPM table */
+ config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.flags = 0;
+ lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
+
+ /* Init RCU variable */
+ sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
+ rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
+ RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
+
+ rcu_cfg.v = rv;
+ /* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */
+ if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL) != 0) {
+ printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ writer_done = 0;
+ __atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
+
+ /* Launch reader threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,
+ enabled_core_ids[i]);
+
+ /* Measure add/delete. */
+ begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+ for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+ /* Add all the entries */
+ for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
+ if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
+ large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
+ next_hop_add) != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route# %d\n",
+ i, j);
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ /* Delete all the entries */
+ for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
+ if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
+ large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route# %d\n",
+ i, j);
+ goto error;
+ }
+ }
+ total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
+
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
+ ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
+ (double)total_cycles / (NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * ITERATIONS));
+
+ writer_done = 1;
+ /* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
+ goto error;
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+ rte_free(rv);
+ lpm = NULL;
+ rv = NULL;
+
+ /* Test without RCU integration */
+ printf("\nPerf test: 1 writer, %d readers, RCU integration disabled\n",
+ num_cores);
+
+ /* Create LPM table */
+ config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.number_tbl8s = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
+ config.flags = 0;
+ lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
+
+ writer_done = 0;
+ __atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
+
+ /* Launch reader threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_reader, NULL,
+ enabled_core_ids[i]);
+
+ /* Measure add/delete. */
+ begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+ for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+ /* Add all the entries */
+ for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
+ if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
+ large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
+ next_hop_add) != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route# %d\n",
+ i, j);
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ /* Delete all the entries */
+ for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
+ if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
+ large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
+ printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route# %d\n",
+ i, j);
+ goto error;
+ }
+ }
+ total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
+
+ printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n",
+ ITERATIONS * NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
+ printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
+ (double)total_cycles / (NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES * ITERATIONS));
+
+ writer_done = 1;
+ /* Wait and check return value from reader threads */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
+ printf("Warning: lcore %u not finished.\n",
+ enabled_core_ids[i]);
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+
+ return 0;
+
+error:
+ writer_done = 1;
+ /* Wait until all readers have exited */
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+ rte_free(rv);
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
static int
test_lpm_perf(void)
{
- struct rte_lpm *lpm = NULL;
struct rte_lpm_config config;
config.max_rules = 2000000;
@@ -343,7 +825,7 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
- /* Measue add. */
unintentional typo?
[Ruifeng] Yes, this is a typo fix. I assume it is OK not to be split out.
+ /* Measure add. */
begin = rte_rdtsc();
for (i = 0; i < NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES; i++) {
@@ -478,6 +960,10 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
rte_lpm_delete_all(lpm);
rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+ test_lpm_rcu_perf();
+
+ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer();
+
return 0;
}
Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com><mailto:vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
--
Regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 6:34 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/3] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-23 1:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-26 3:11 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-26 5:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-08-22 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-18 16:15 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:17 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:45 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/lpm: reset total time Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-18 16:17 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:22 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/ring: add peek API Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 19:49 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09 4:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-10 15:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 5:03 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-11 14:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 18:28 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-13 20:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-14 4:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lib/rcu: add resource reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:29 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 12:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 6:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 10:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:42 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 11:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 19:01 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-07 13:11 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-13 3:02 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 16:48 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-18 3:47 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-29 20:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-30 17:37 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-07 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-19 23:22 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-20 8:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 8:42 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 8:51 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 9:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:27 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:25 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 18:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs David Marchand
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-04 16:05 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-09 3:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:36 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 11:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-18 3:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 13:02 ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-03 9:09 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 18:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-18 17:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-18 17:21 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-22 5:46 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-23 4:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 11:56 ` David Marchand
2020-06-29 12:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-30 10:35 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-03 7:43 ` David Marchand
2020-07-04 17:00 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-30 10:33 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:30 ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 15:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:00 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:07 ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 11:49 ` David Marchand
2020-07-09 14:35 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 12:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library David Marchand
2020-07-10 14:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=HE1PR0801MB202542DBB0EEABEC2A2B085E9E670@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).