From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:00:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <HE1PR0801MB20258C304AE23716F6CE67999E670@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3f83d51-0e0a-49ab-adf3-0b4ae3bdd3e4@intel.com>
From: Medvedkin, Vladimir <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 8:37 PM
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; mdr@ashroe.eu; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests
Hi Ruifeng,
Just a few nits
[Ruifeng] Thank you for reviewing this patch.
On 07/07/2020 16:15, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
Add positive and negative tests for API rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add.
Also test LPM library behavior when RCU QSBR is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com><mailto:ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com><mailto:gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com><mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
---
app/test/test_lpm.c | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 290 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm.c b/app/test/test_lpm.c
index 3a3fd097f..93742e3c7 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <rte_ip.h>
#include <rte_lpm.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include "test.h"
#include "test_xmmt_ops.h"
@@ -40,6 +41,9 @@ static int32_t test15(void);
static int32_t test16(void);
static int32_t test17(void);
static int32_t test18(void);
+static int32_t test19(void);
+static int32_t test20(void);
+static int32_t test21(void);
rte_lpm_test tests[] = {
/* Test Cases */
@@ -61,7 +65,10 @@ rte_lpm_test tests[] = {
test15,
test16,
test17,
- test18
+ test18,
+ test19,
+ test20,
+ test21
};
#define MAX_DEPTH 32
@@ -1265,6 +1272,288 @@ test18(void)
return PASS;
}
+/*
+ * rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add positive and negative tests.
+ * - Add RCU QSBR variable to LPM
+ * - Add another RCU QSBR variable to LPM
+ * - Check returns
+ */
+int32_t
+test19(void)
+{
+ struct rte_lpm *lpm = NULL;
+ struct rte_lpm_config config;
+ size_t sz;
+ struct rte_rcu_qsbr *qsv;
+ struct rte_rcu_qsbr *qsv2;
+ int32_t status;
+ struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
+
+ config.max_rules = MAX_RULES;
+ config.number_tbl8s = NUMBER_TBL8S;
+ config.flags = 0;
+
+ lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
+
+ /* Create RCU QSBR variable */
+ sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(RTE_MAX_LCORE);
+ qsv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,
+ RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(qsv != NULL);
+
+ status = rte_rcu_qsbr_init(qsv, RTE_MAX_LCORE);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ rcu_cfg.v = qsv;
+ /* Invalid QSBR mode */
+ rcu_cfg.mode = 2;
+ status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);
+
+ rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ;
+ /* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */
+ status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ /* Create and attach another RCU QSBR to LPM table */
+ qsv2 = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,
+ RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(qsv2 != NULL);
+
+ rcu_cfg.v = qsv2;
+ rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;
+ status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+ rte_free(qsv);
+ rte_free(qsv2);
+
+ return PASS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add DQ mode functional test.
+ * Reader and writer are in the same thread in this test.
+ * - Create LPM which supports 1 tbl8 group at max
+ * - Add RCU QSBR variable to LPM
+ * - Add a rule with depth=28 (> 24)
+ * - Register a reader thread (not a real thread)
+ * - Reader lookup existing rule
+ * - Writer delete the rule
+ * - Reader lookup the rule
+ * - Writer re-add the rule (no available tbl8 group)
+ * - Reader report quiescent state and unregister
+ * - Writer re-add the rule
+ * - Reader lookup the rule
+ */
+int32_t
+test20(void)
+{
+ struct rte_lpm *lpm = NULL;
+ struct rte_lpm_config config;
+ size_t sz;
+ struct rte_rcu_qsbr *qsv;
+ int32_t status;
+ uint32_t ip, next_hop, next_hop_return;
+ uint8_t depth;
+ struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
+
+ config.max_rules = MAX_RULES;
+ config.number_tbl8s = 1;
+ config.flags = 0;
+
+ lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
+
+ /* Create RCU QSBR variable */
+ sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(1);
+ qsv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,
+ RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(qsv != NULL);
+
+ status = rte_rcu_qsbr_init(qsv, 1);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ rcu_cfg.v = qsv;
+ rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ;
+ /* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */
+ status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ ip = RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 100, 100);
This is a globally routed ip, it looks like you missed "6" in the second octet. Here it is better to use the rfc5737 address, rather than rfc1918.
[Ruifeng] Agreed. Use reserved address is better. Will change to rfc5737 address in next version.
+ depth = 28;
+ next_hop = 1;
+ status = rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);
+
+ /* Register pseudo reader */
+ status = rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(qsv, 0);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_online(qsv, 0);
+
+ status = rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip, &next_hop_return);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(next_hop_return == next_hop);
+
+ /* Writer update */
+ status = rte_lpm_delete(lpm, ip, depth);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(!lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid);
+
+ status = rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip, &next_hop_return);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);
+
+ status = rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);
+
+ /* Reader quiescent */
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(qsv, 0);
+
+ status = rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_offline(qsv, 0);
+ status = rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(qsv, 0);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ status = rte_lpm_lookup(lpm, ip, &next_hop_return);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(next_hop_return == next_hop);
+
+ rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+ rte_free(qsv);
+
+ return PASS;
+}
+
+static struct rte_lpm *g_lpm;
+static struct rte_rcu_qsbr *g_v;
+static uint32_t g_ip = RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 100, 100);
Same here as above
[Ruifeng] Will change. Thank you.
+static volatile uint8_t writer_done;
+/* Report quiescent state interval every 1024 lookups. Larger critical
+ * sections in reader will result in writer polling multiple times.
+ */
+#define QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL 1024
+#define WRITER_ITERATIONS 512
+
+/*
+ * Reader thread using rte_lpm data structure with RCU.
+ */
+static int
+test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader(void *arg)
+{
+ int i;
+ uint32_t next_hop_return = 0;
+
+ RTE_SET_USED(arg);
+ /* Register this thread to report quiescent state */
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_register(g_v, 0);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_online(g_v, 0);
+
+ do {
+ for (i = 0; i < QSBR_REPORTING_INTERVAL; i++)
+ rte_lpm_lookup(g_lpm, g_ip, &next_hop_return);
+
+ /* Update quiescent state */
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(g_v, 0);
+ } while (!writer_done);
+
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_offline(g_v, 0);
+ rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_unregister(g_v, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add sync mode functional test.
+ * 1 Reader and 1 writer. They cannot be in the same thread in this test.
+ * - Create LPM which supports 1 tbl8 group at max
+ * - Add RCU QSBR variable with sync mode to LPM
+ * - Register a reader thread. Reader keeps looking up a specific rule.
+ * - Writer keeps adding and deleting a specific rule with depth=28 (> 24)
+ */
+int32_t
+test21(void)
+{
+ struct rte_lpm_config config;
+ size_t sz;
+ int32_t status;
+ uint32_t i, next_hop;
+ uint8_t depth;
+ struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
+
+ if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) {
+ printf("Not enough cores for %s, expecting at least 2\n",
+ __func__);
+ return TEST_SKIPPED;
+ }
+
+ config.max_rules = MAX_RULES;
+ config.number_tbl8s = 1;
+ config.flags = 0;
+
+ g_lpm = rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(g_lpm != NULL);
+
+ /* Create RCU QSBR variable */
+ sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(1);
+ g_v = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sz,
+ RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(g_v != NULL);
+
+ status = rte_rcu_qsbr_init(g_v, 1);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ rcu_cfg.v = g_v;
+ rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;
+ /* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */
+ status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(g_lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
+
+ writer_done = 0;
+ /* Launch reader thread */
+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,
+ rte_get_next_lcore(-1, 1, 0));
+
+ depth = 28;
+ next_hop = 1;
+ status = rte_lpm_add(g_lpm, g_ip, depth, next_hop);
+ if (status != 0) {
+ printf("%s: Failed to add rule\n", __func__);
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ /* Writer update */
+ for (i = 0; i < WRITER_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+ status = rte_lpm_delete(g_lpm, g_ip, depth);
+ if (status != 0) {
+ printf("%s: Failed to delete rule at iteration %d\n",
+ __func__, i);
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ status = rte_lpm_add(g_lpm, g_ip, depth, next_hop);
+ if (status != 0) {
+ printf("%s: Failed to add rule at iteration %d\n",
+ __func__, i);
+ goto error;
+ }
+ }
+
+error:
+ writer_done = 1;
+ /* Wait until reader exited. */
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ rte_lpm_free(g_lpm);
+ rte_free(g_v);
+
+ return (status == 0) ? PASS : -1;
+}
+
/*
* Do all unit tests.
*/
Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com><mailto:vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
--
Regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 6:34 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/3] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-23 1:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-26 3:11 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-26 5:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-08-22 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-18 16:15 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:17 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:45 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/lpm: reset total time Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-18 16:17 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:22 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/ring: add peek API Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 19:49 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09 4:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-10 15:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 5:03 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-11 14:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 18:28 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-13 20:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-14 4:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lib/rcu: add resource reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:29 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 12:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 6:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 10:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:42 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 11:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 19:01 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-07 13:11 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-13 3:02 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 16:48 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-18 3:47 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-29 20:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-30 17:37 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-07 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-19 23:22 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-20 8:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 8:42 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 8:51 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 9:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:27 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:25 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 18:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs David Marchand
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-04 16:05 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-09 3:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:36 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 11:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-18 3:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 13:02 ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-03 9:09 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 18:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-18 17:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-18 17:21 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-22 5:46 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-23 4:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 11:56 ` David Marchand
2020-06-29 12:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-30 10:35 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-03 7:43 ` David Marchand
2020-07-04 17:00 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-30 10:33 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:30 ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 15:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:00 ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:07 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 11:49 ` David Marchand
2020-07-09 14:35 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 12:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library David Marchand
2020-07-10 14:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=HE1PR0801MB20258C304AE23716F6CE67999E670@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).