From: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "Amber, Kumar" <kumar.amber@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Thakur, Sham Singh" <sham.singh.thakur@intel.com>,
David Marchand <dmarchan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] hash: added a new API to hash to query key id
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:19:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB44474DD92460B094C4EF1C98D7450@MN2PR11MB4447.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tk17n8t4y.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
Hi Aaron,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 10:54 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Cc: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Amber, Kumar
> <kumar.amber@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Wang, Yipeng1
> <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Thakur,
> Sham Singh <sham.singh.thakur@intel.com>; David Marchand
> <dmarchan@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] hash: added a new API to hash to query
> key id
>
> Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
> >
> >>> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> >>> > - if (!service_valid(id))
> >>> > + if (id >= RTE_SERVICE_NUM_MAX || !service_valid(id))
> >>
> >> Why not adding this check in service_valid()?
> >
> > I think the best fix is to use SERVICE_VALID_GET_OR_ERR_RET() in these
> > places. For this, I at least want to try and show that there aren't any
> > further errors. And my test loop has been running for a while now
> > without any more errors or segfaults, so I guess it's okay to build a
> > proper patch.
>
> This popped up:
>
> EAL: Test assert service_lcore_en_dis_able line 487 failed: Ex-service core
> function call had no effect.
>
> So I'll spend some time in this area, it seems.
The below diff makes it 100% reproducible here, failing every time.
It seems like the main thread is returning, before the service thread has returned.
The rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore() call seems to not wait on the service-core, which allows
the main thread to read the "service_remote_launch_flag" value as 0 (before the service-thread writes it to 1).
Adding the delay between the service launch and service write being performed makes this issue much much more likely to occur - so the above description I have confidence in.
What I'm not clear on (yet) is why the eal_mp_wait_lcore() isn't waiting...
-H
diff --git a/app/test/test_service_cores.c b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
index 9fe38f5e0..846ad00d1 100644
--- a/app/test/test_service_cores.c
+++ b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static int
service_remote_launch_func(void *arg)
{
RTE_SET_USED(arg);
+ rte_delay_ms(100);
service_remote_launch_flag = 1;
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-26 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-22 14:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Kumar Amber
2019-11-22 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Kumar Amber
2019-11-25 11:08 ` Kumar Amber
2019-11-25 15:50 ` Amber, Kumar
2019-11-25 16:01 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-25 16:58 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-25 17:16 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2019-11-25 17:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-25 18:10 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-25 22:53 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-26 13:19 ` Van Haaren, Harry [this message]
2019-11-26 13:29 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2019-11-26 13:57 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-27 11:37 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2019-11-26 15:58 ` Aaron Conole
2019-11-25 19:41 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-11-26 2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Kumar Amber
2019-11-27 1:59 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-01-20 0:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB44474DD92460B094C4EF1C98D7450@MN2PR11MB4447.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=kumar.amber@intel.com \
--cc=sham.singh.thakur@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).