Thanks Bruce & Cristian for the comments.
An increase seems ok to me, but is an 8x increase really necessary? If
lines in the config files are over 1k in size, then it implies that some
other mechanism would surely be better for configuration.
Can we make do with an increase to 512 only?
Happy
to compromise with 1K.
VV>
Sure let me update this is v2.
From: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Sent: 06 December 2023 19:04
To: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Varghese, Vipin <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; Yigit, Ferruh <Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] cfgfile: increase value length
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:22 PM
> To: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>;
> Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfgfile: increase value length
>
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:59:52PM +0530, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> > The default value for CFG_VALUE_LEN is set to 256 characters.
> > This limits the parsing for longer strings in configuration file.
> > Setting the default to 2048 characters increases the value array
> > size in `struct rte_cfgfile_entry`.
> >
> > Files using cfgfile library are
> > 1. drivers/net/mvpp2/
> > 2. app/test-dma-perf/
> > 3. app/test/
> > 4. examples/qos_sched/
> >
> > The structure `rte_cfgfile_entry` is not included in DPDK libraries.
> > Modifying from 256 to 2048 allows `app/test-dma-perf/main.c` helps to
> > parse longer string as shared in
>
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1333
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
> > Suggested-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
> > ---
> > lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h b/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
> > index 232c65c77b..401353c44e 100644
> > --- a/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
> > +++ b/lib/cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.h
> > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ extern "C" {
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifndef CFG_VALUE_LEN
> > -#define CFG_VALUE_LEN 256
> > +#define CFG_VALUE_LEN 2048
> > #endif
> >
> An increase seems ok to me, but is an 8x increase really necessary? If
> lines in the config files are over 1k in size, then it implies that some
> other mechanism would surely be better for configuration.
> Can we make do with an increase to 512 only?
>
> /Bruce
Happy to compromise with 1K.
Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>